[
Ahmed, Sara. 2010. Happy Objects In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 29–52. London: Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Al-Saji, Alia. 2004. “The Memory of Another Past: Bergson, Deleuze and a New Theory of Time.” Continental Philosophy Review (37): 203–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-005-5560-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderst, Leah. 2017. “The Self as Evidence and Collaborative Identity in Contemporary Autobiographical Documentary.” 32 (2): 255–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2017.1288030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anonymous. 2020. “Notes. Performance Piece.” Archive.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bluck, Susan. 2003. “Autobiographical Memory: Exploring Its Functions in Everyday Life.” Memory 11 (2): 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/741938206
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. Transpositions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Busch, Fred. 2015. “Working Through Sarah Polley’s Stories We Tell (and the issue of creative expression).” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 96 (2): 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12310
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Casey, Edward S. 2004. “Mapping the Earth in Works of Art.” In Rethinking Nature, Essays in Environmental Philosophy, edited by Robert Frodeman and Bruce V. Foltz, 260–268. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Bergsonism. New York: Zone Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dictionary.com. n.d. Accessed December 25, 2022. KINTSUGI Definition & Usage Examples | Dictionary. com.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawkins, Gay. 2002. Documentary Affect: Filming rubbish. September. http://australianhumanitiesreview.org/2002/09/01/documentary-affect-filming-rubbish/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hustvedt, Siri. 2016. A Woman Looking at Men Looking at Women: Essays on art, sex, and the mind. Simon & Schuster.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ingold, Tim. 2016. Lines. New York: Routledge Classics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karlholm, Dan. 2017. “After Contemporary Art: Actualization and Anachrony.” The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 51: 35–54. https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v25i51.25155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirmayer, Lawrence J. 1993. “Healing and the Invention of Metaphor: The effectiveness of symbols revisited.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 17: 161–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01379325
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luciano, Bernadette, and Susanna Scarparo. 2017. “Stories My Mother Never Told Me: The Autobio-graphical Films of Alina Marazzi, Margot Nash, and Sarah Polley.” Quarterly Review of Film and Video. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2019.1593031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, Brian. 1995. “The Autonomy of Affect.” Cultural Critique (31): 83–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, Brian. 2000. “Too Blue: Colour Patch for an Expanded Empiricism.” Cultural Studies 14 (2): 182. https://doi.org/10.1080/095023800334869
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moxey, Keith. 2018. “What Time is it in the History of Art?” In Time in the History of Art: Temporality, chronology and anachrony, edited by Dan Karlholm and Keith Moxley, 13–42. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murphie, Andrew. 2014. “Making Sense: The Transformation of Documentary by Digital and Networked Media.” Studies in Documentary Film 8 (3): 188–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2014.961631
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nichols, Bill. 1991. Representing Reality: Issues and concepts in documentary. Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pearlman, Karen, and John Sutton. 2022. “Reframing the Director: Distributed Creativity in Filmmaking Practice.” In A Companion to Motion Pictures and Public Value, edited by Mette Hjort, Ted Nannicelli, 86–104. John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119677154
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piotrowska, Agniezka. 2018. “Replacement and Reparation in Sarah Polley’s Stories We Tell.” In On Replacement: Cultural, social and psychological representations, edited by Jean Owen and Naomi Segal. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76011-7_22
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polley, Sarah, interview by Kate Kellaway. 2013. Sarah Polley: Stories are our way of coping, of creating shape out of mess (June 23). 2012. Stories We Tell. Directed by Sarah Polley. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2366450/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roscoe, Jane, and Craig Haight. 2001. Faking It. Mock-documentary and the subversion of factuality. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. 1994a. “The Memory of the Senses, Part I: Marks of the Transitory.” In The Senses Still: Perception and memory as material culture in modernity, edited by C. Nadia Seremetakis, 1–19. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10:0-226-74877
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seremetakis, C. Nadia. 1994b. “The Memory of the Senses, Part II: Still Acts.” In The Senses Still: Perception and memory as material culture in modernity, edited by C. Nadia Seremetakis, 23–45. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429314506
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stewart, Kathleen. 2007. Ordinary Affects. Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waites, Katie J. 2015. “Sarah Polley’s documemoir “Stories We Tell”: The Refracted Subject.” Biography (University of Hawai’i Press) 38 (4): 543–555. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24803074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weil, Simone. 1947. Gravity and Grace. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
