<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>This article explores witnessing within and as participatory journalism (participatory witnessing) based on a case study of narratives of the Aleppo siege created by amateur content producers, professional journalists and commenting audiences. To analyse the nuances and challenges of participatory witnessing as a practice and a field, I examine the narratives of all parties (tweeters in Aleppo, news outlets and people commenting below the news articles) as well as their visual and textual strategies for gaining “trust” by claiming authenticity. While news outlets were largely sympathetic to tweeters and amplified their messages, the commenting audience distanced themselves from the suffering and refused to bear witness by responding with four narratives: “tweeters are fake,” “tweeters are terrorists,” “the media is lying” and “collateral damage.” Many elements from the “post-truth” narrative repertoire were utilised to create distance from the scene of suffering. Therefore, empowering vulnerable parties to participate “in journalism” (inviting the audiences to “bear witness”) does not necessarily lead to participation “through journalism” (audiences “bearing witness” in response to these calls).</p>
</abstract>

This article explores witnessing within and as participatory journalism (participatory witnessing) based on a case study of narratives of the Aleppo siege created by amateur content producers, professional journalists and commenting audiences. To analyse the nuances and challenges of participatory witnessing as a practice and a field, I examine the narratives of all parties (tweeters in Aleppo, news outlets and people commenting below the news articles) as well as their visual and textual strategies for gaining “trust” by claiming authenticity. While news outlets were largely sympathetic to tweeters and amplified their messages, the commenting audience distanced themselves from the suffering and refused to bear witness by responding with four narratives: “tweeters are fake,” “tweeters are terrorists,” “the media is lying” and “collateral damage.” Many elements from the “post-truth” narrative repertoire were utilised to create distance from the scene of suffering. Therefore, empowering vulnerable parties to participate “in journalism” (inviting the audiences to “bear witness”) does not necessarily lead to participation “through journalism” (audiences “bearing witness” in response to these calls).

Witnessing in Participatory Journalism: Siege of Aleppo and Narratives of Authenticity

Baltic Screen Media Review

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This article explores witnessing within and as participatory journalism (participatory witnessing) based on a case study of narratives of the Aleppo siege...

Witnessing in Participatory Journalism: Siege of Aleppo and Narratives of Authenticity

Data publikacji: 09 maj 2022

Zakres stron: 30 - 45

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsmr-2022-0004

Słowa kluczowe
media witnessing, distant suffering, participatory journalism, Aleppo siege, visual narrative analysis, user-generated content

© 2022 Jaana Davidjants, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Witnessing in Participatory Journalism: Siege of Aleppo and Narratives of Authenticity

Data publikacji: 09 maj 2022

Zakres stron: 30 - 45

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsmr-2022-0004

Słowa kluczowemedia witnessing, distant suffering, participatory journalism, Aleppo siege, visual narrative analysis, user-generated content

© 2022 Jaana Davidjants, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Słowa kluczowe
media witnessing, distant suffering, participatory journalism, Aleppo siege, visual narrative analysis, user-generated content