[Blaschke, T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.00410.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Blotevogel, H. H., Danielzyk, R. and Münter, A. (2014). Spatial Planning in Germany: Institutional inertia and new challenges. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Briassoulis, H. (1997). How the others plan: exploring the shape and forms of informal planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X970170020210.1177/0739456X9701700202]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Broeck, P.V.d., Moulaert, F., Kuhk, A., Lievois, E., and Schreurs, J. (2014). Spatial Planning in Flanders Serving a bypassed capitalism? Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carmona, M. (2017). The formal and informal tools of design governance. Journal of Urban Design, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.123433810.1080/13574809.2016.1234338]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Certomà, C., Notteboom B. (2017). Informal planning in a transactive governmentality: Re-reading planning practices through Ghent’s community gardens. Planning Theory, 16(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309521559817710.1177/1473095215598177]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cotella, G. (2014). Spatial Planning in Poland Between European Influence and Dominant Market Forces Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council of Europe. (1983). 6th European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning, CEMAT, In Prospects of development and of spatial planning in maritime region. Torremolinos, Spain: 19–20 May.]Search in Google Scholar
[Damsgaard, O. (2014). The Danish Planning System 1990–2010: Continuity and decay. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Donovan, M.G. (2008). Informal cities and the contestation of public space: The case of Bogotá’s street vendors, 1988–2003. Urban Studies, 45(1), 29–51.10.1177/0042098007085100]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Erkut, G. and Sezgin, E. (2014). Spatial and Strategic Planning in Turkey: Institutional change and new challenges. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Evers, D. (2015). Formal institutional change and informal institutional persistence: the case of Dutch provinces implementing the Spatial Planning Act. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1068/c139110.1068/c1391]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Friedmann, J. (2005). Planning Cultures in Transition. Bishwapriya Sanyal eds. Comparative Planning Cultures. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geppert, A. (2014). France, Drifting Away from the “Regional Economic” Approach. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Getimis, P. and Giannakourou, G. (2014). The Evolution of Spatial Planning in Greece after the 1990s: Drivers, directions and agents of change. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanssen, G. S., & Falleth, E. I. (2014). Market-Oriented Urban Planning – Constraining Citizen Participation. Local Government Studies, 40(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.83425410.1080/03003930.2013.834254]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Healey, P. (1999). Institutionalist Analysis, Communicative Planning, and Shaping Places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X990190020110.1177/0739456X9901900201]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Högström, J., Balfors, B., & Hammer, M. (2017). Planning for sustainability in expansive metropolitan regions: exploring practices and planners’ expectations in Stockholm, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 26(3), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.139175110.1080/09654313.2017.1391751]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kušar, S. (2010). Landscape studies informal planning practices: Some evidence from Slovenia. Journal of Landscape Studies, 3(3), 159–165.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leibenath, M., Wirth, P., & Lintz, G. (2016). Just a talking shop? – Informal participatory spatial planning for implementing state wind energy targets in Germany. Utilities Policy, 41, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.00810.1016/j.jup.2016.02.008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lemke, T. (2000) Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Paper presented at the Rethinking Marxism Conference, University of Amherst, Amherst, MA, 21–24 September.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lingua, V. and Servillo, L. (2014). The Modernization of The Italian Planning System. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loepfe, M., & Eisinger, A. (2017). Assemblages for Urban Transformation. disP - The Planning Review, 53(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2017.131652610.1080/02513625.2017.1316526]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lutzoni, L. (2016). In-formalised urban space design. Rethinking the relationship between formal and informal. City Territ Archit, 3(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-016-0046-910.1186/s40410-016-0046-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Maier, K. (2014). Changing Planning in The Czech Republic. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mäntysalo, R., Jarenko, K., Nilsson, K. L. & Saglie, I-L. (2015). Legitimacy of Informal Strategic Urban Planning Observations from Finland, Sweden and Norway. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.86180810.1080/09654313.2013.861808]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McFarlane, C. & Waibel, M. (eds.). (2012). Urban Informalities: Reflections on the Formal and Informal. London: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nadin, V. and Stead, D. (2014). Spatial Planning in The United Kingdom, 1990–2013. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Needham, B. (2005). The New Dutch spatial planning act: Continuity and change in the way in which the Dutch regulate the practice of spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 20(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269745060056866210.1080/02697450600568662]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Newman, P. and Thornley, A. (1996). The National Framework: Planning Systems. In Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects, pp. 27–75.]Search in Google Scholar
[North, D. C. (1990). An introduction to institutions and institutional change. In Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678.00310.1017/CBO9780511808678.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Papamichail, T. and Perić, A (2017). Informal Planning: Towards Promoting Resilient Governance in Greece. International conference on Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions, SSPCR 2017, 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_3510.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_35]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Peric, A. & Hoch, C. (2017). Spatial planning across European planning systems and social models: A look through the lens of planning cultures of Switzerland, Greece and Serbia. Proceedings: AESOP 2017 Conference “Spaces of Dialog for Places of Dignity: Fostering the European Dimension of Planning”.https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-00022662710.3929/ethz-b-000226627]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Reimer, M. (2013). Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning. Sustainability, 5(11), 4653–4673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su511465310.3390/su5114653]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Roy, A. (2009). Strangely Familiar: Planning and the Worlds of Insurgence and Informality. Planning Theory, 8(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520809929410.1177/1473095208099294]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sari, H.K. and Mäntysalo, R. (2014). The Recent Development of The Finnish Planning System The city of Vantaa as an executor, fighter and independent actor. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sartorio, F. S. (2005). Strategic Spatial Planning A Historical Review of Approaches, its Recent Revival, and an Overview of the State of The Art in Italy. disP - The Planning Review, 41(162). https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2005.1055693010.1080/02513625.2005.10556930]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Scholl, B. (2017). Building Actor Relationships and Alliances for Complex Problem Solving in Spatial Planning: The Test Planning Method. disP - The Planning Review, 53(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2017.131654410.1080/02513625.2017.1316544]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Scholl, B., Vinzens, M. and Staub, B. (2013). Test Planning – A Method with a Future: Main features and information on the practical application of the test planning process using Riedholz/Luterbach as an example.]Search in Google Scholar
[Syssner, J, Meijer, M. (2017). Informal Planning in Depopulating Rural Areas: A resource-based view on informal planning practices. European Countryside, 9(3), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-002710.1515/euco-2017-0027]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2012). Formal/Informal Dialectics and the Self-Transformation of Spatial Planning Systems. Administration & Society, 46(6), 654–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539971246919410.1177/0095399712469194]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zonneveld, W. and Evers, D. (2014). Dutch National Spatial Planning at The End of An Era. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar