Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis in Children with Developmental Delay/Intellectual Disability

1 Choo YY, Agarwal P, How CH, Yeleswarapu SP. Developmental delay: Identification and management at primary care level. Singapore Med J. 2019; 60(3): 119–123. ChooYY AgarwalP HowCH YeleswarapuSP Developmental delay: Identification and management at primary care level Singapore Med J 2019 60 3 119 123 10.11622/smedj.2019025644168430997518 Search in Google Scholar

2 Michelson DJ, Shevell MI, Sherr EH, Moeschler JB, Gropman AL, Ashwal S. Evidence report: Genetic and metabolic testing on children with global developmental delay: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2011; 77(17): 1629–635. MichelsonDJ ShevellMI SherrEH MoeschlerJB GropmanAL AshwalS Evidence report: Genetic and metabolic testing on children with global developmental delay: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society Neurology 2011 77 17 1629 635 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318234589621956720 Search in Google Scholar

3 Kaufman L, Ayub M, Vincent JB. The genetic basis of non-syndromic intellectual disability: A review. J Neu-rodev Disord. 2010; 2(4): 182–209. KaufmanL AyubM VincentJB The genetic basis of non-syndromic intellectual disability: A review J Neu-rodev Disord 2010 2 4 182 209 10.1007/s11689-010-9055-2297491121124998 Search in Google Scholar

4 Lo-Castro A, Curatolo P. Epilepsy associated with autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Is there a genetic link? Brain Dev. 2014; 36(3): 185–193. Lo-CastroA CuratoloP Epilepsy associated with autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Is there a genetic link? Brain Dev. 2014 36 3 185 193 10.1016/j.braindev.2013.04.01323726375 Search in Google Scholar

5 Moeschler JB, Shevell M; Committee on Genetics. Comprehensive evaluation of the child with intellectual disability or global developmental delays. Pediatrics. 2014; 134(3): e903–e918. MoeschlerJB ShevellM Committee on Genetics Comprehensive evaluation of the child with intellectual disability or global developmental delays Pediatrics 2014 134 3 e903 e918 10.1542/peds.2014-183925157020 Search in Google Scholar

6 Miclea D, Peca L, Cuzmici Z, Pop IV. Genetic testing in patients with global developmental delay/intellectual disabilities. A review. Clujul Med. 2015; 88(3): 288–292. MicleaD PecaL CuzmiciZ PopIV Genetic testing in patients with global developmental delay/intellectual disabilities. A review Clujul Med 2015 88 3 288 292 10.15386/cjmed-461463288426609258 Search in Google Scholar

7 Wang R, Lei T, Fu F, Li R, Jing X, Yang X, et al. Application of chromosome microarray analysis in patients with unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability in South China. Pediatr Neonatol. 2019; 60(1): 35–42. WangR LeiT FuF LiR JingX YangX Application of chromosome microarray analysis in patients with unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability in South China Pediatr Neonatol 2019 60 1 35 42 10.1016/j.pedneo.2018.03.00629631977 Search in Google Scholar

8 Lee C, Iafrate AJ, Brothman AR. Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nat Genet. 2007; 39(7 Suppl) :S48–S54. LeeC IafrateAJ BrothmanAR Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders Nat Genet 2007 39 7 Suppl S48 S54 10.1038/ng209217597782 Search in Google Scholar

9 Weise A, Mrasek K, Klein E, Mulatinho M, Llerena JC Jr, Hardekopf D, et al. Microdeletion and microduplication syndromes. J Histochem Cytochem. 2012; 60(5): 346–358. WeiseA MrasekK KleinE MulatinhoM LlerenaJCJr HardekopfD Microdeletion and microduplication syndromes J Histochem Cytochem 2012 60 5 346 358 10.1369/0022155412440001335123022396478 Search in Google Scholar

10 Watson CT, Marques-Bonet T, Sharp AJ, Mefford HC. The genetics of microdeletion and microduplication syndromes: an update. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2014; 15: 215–244. WatsonCT Marques-BonetT SharpAJ MeffordHC The genetics of microdeletion and microduplication syndromes: an update Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2014 15 215 244 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153408447625824773319 Search in Google Scholar

11 Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker LG, Brothman AR, Carter NP, et al. Consensus statement: Chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 86(5): 749–764. MillerDT AdamMP AradhyaS BieseckerLG BrothmanAR CarterNP Consensus statement: Chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies Am J Hum Genet 2010 86 5 749 764 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006286900020466091 Search in Google Scholar

12 McGowan-Jordan J, Simons A, Schmid M. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 2016. McGowan-JordanJ SimonsA SchmidM An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature Basel, Switzerland Karger 2016 Search in Google Scholar

13 Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, Quintero-Rivera F, South ST; Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med. 2011; 13(7): 680–685. KearneyHM ThorlandEC BrownKK Quintero-RiveraF SouthST Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants Genet Med 2011 13 7 680 685 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182217a3a21681106 Search in Google Scholar

14 Ballif BC, Rorem EA, Sundin K, Lincicum M, Gaskin S, Coppinger J, et al. Detection of low-level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimens. Am J Med Genet A. 2006; 140(24): 2757–2767. BallifBC RoremEA SundinK LincicumM GaskinS CoppingerJ Detection of low-level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimens Am J Med Genet A 2006 140 24 2757 2767 10.1002/ajmg.a.3153917103431 Search in Google Scholar

15 Aston E, Whitby H, Maxwell T, Glaus N, Cowley B, Lowry D, et al. Comparison of targeted and whole genome analysis of postnatal specimens using a commercially available array based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) microarray platform. J Med Genet. 2008; 45(5): 268–274. AstonE WhitbyH MaxwellT GlausN CowleyB LowryD Comparison of targeted and whole genome analysis of postnatal specimens using a commercially available array based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) microarray platform J Med Genet 2008 45 5 268 274 10.1136/jmg.2007.05531918178633 Search in Google Scholar

16 Lee KY, Shin E. Application of array comparative genomic hybridization in Korean children under 6 years old with global developmental delay. Korean J Pediatr. 2017; 60(9): 282–289. LeeKY ShinE Application of array comparative genomic hybridization in Korean children under 6 years old with global developmental delay Korean J Pediatr 2017 60 9 282 289 10.3345/kjp.2017.60.9.282563883429042871 Search in Google Scholar

17 Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Cooper GM, Antonacci F, Siswara P, Itsara A, et al. A recurrent 16p12.1 microdeletion supports a two-hit model for severe developmental delay. Nat Genet. 2010; 42(3): 203–209. GirirajanS RosenfeldJA CooperGM AntonacciF SiswaraP ItsaraA A recurrent 16p12.1 microdeletion supports a two-hit model for severe developmental delay Nat Genet 2010 42 3 203 209 10.1038/ng.534284789620154674 Search in Google Scholar

18 Conrad B, Antonarakis SE. Gene duplication: A drive for phenotypic diversity and cause of human disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2007; 8: 17–35. ConradB AntonarakisSE Gene duplication: A drive for phenotypic diversity and cause of human disease Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2007 8 17 35 10.1146/annurev.genom.8.021307.11023317386002 Search in Google Scholar

19 Rice AM, McLysaght A. Dosage sensitivity is a major determinant of human copy number variant pathogenicity. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 14366. RiceAM McLysaghtA Dosage sensitivity is a major determinant of human copy number variant pathogenicity Nat Commun 2017 8 14366 10.1038/ncomms14366530979828176757 Search in Google Scholar

20 Stankiewicz P, Pursley AN, Cheung SW. Challenges in clinical interpretation of microduplications detected by array CGH analysis. Am J Med Genet A. 2010; 152A(5): 1089–1100. StankiewiczP PursleyAN CheungSW Challenges in clinical interpretation of microduplications detected by array CGH analysis Am J Med Genet A 2010 152A 5 1089 1100 10.1002/ajmg.a.3321620425815 Search in Google Scholar

21 Zahir FR, Langlois S, Gall K, Eydoux P, Marra MA, Friedman JM. A novel de novo 1.1 Mb duplication of 17q21.33 associated with cognitive impairment and other anomalies. Am J Med Genet A. 2009; 149A(6): 1257–1262. ZahirFR LangloisS GallK EydouxP MarraMA FriedmanJM A novel de novo 1.1 Mb duplication of 17q21.33 associated with cognitive impairment and other anomalies Am J Med Genet A 2009 149A 6 1257 1262 10.1002/ajmg.a.3282719449402 Search in Google Scholar

22 Kemeny S, Pebrel-Richard C, Eymard-Pierre E, Gay-Bellile M, Gouas L, Goumy C, et al. Clinical and molecular description of a 17q21.33 microduplication in a girl with severe kyphoscoliosis and developmental delay. Eur J Med Genet. 2014; 57(10): 552–557. KemenyS Pebrel-RichardC Eymard-PierreE Gay-BellileM GouasL GoumyC Clinical and molecular description of a 17q21.33 microduplication in a girl with severe kyphoscoliosis and developmental delay Eur J Med Genet 2014 57 10 552 557 10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.07.00325106685 Search in Google Scholar

23 Speevak MD, Farrell SA. Non-syndromic language delay in a child with disruption in the Protocadherin11X/Y gene pair. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2011; 156B(4): 484–489. SpeevakMD FarrellSA Non-syndromic language delay in a child with disruption in the Protocadherin11X/Y gene pair Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2011 156B 4 484 489 10.1002/ajmg.b.3118621480486 Search in Google Scholar

24 Cianci P, Agosti M, Modena P, Selicorni A. De novo Xq21.31-q21.32 duplication in intellectual disability: A new report. Clin Dysmorphol. 2019; 28(2): 98–100. CianciP AgostiM ModenaP SelicorniA De novo Xq21.31-q21.32 duplication in intellectual disability: A new report Clin Dysmorphol 2019 28 2 98 100 10.1097/00019605-900000000-99539 Search in Google Scholar

25 Verheij JB, de Munnik SA, Dijkhuizen T, de Leeuw N, Olde Weghuis D, van den Hoek GJ, et al. An 8.35 Mb overlapping interstitial deletion of 8q24 in two patients with coloboma, congenital heart defect, limb abnormalities, psychomotor retardation and convulsions. Eur J Med Genet. 2009; 52(5): 353–357. VerheijJB de MunnikSA DijkhuizenT de LeeuwN Olde WeghuisD van den HoekGJ An 8.35 Mb overlapping interstitial deletion of 8q24 in two patients with coloboma, congenital heart defect, limb abnormalities, psychomotor retardation and convulsions Eur J Med Genet 2009 52 5 353 357 10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.05.00619464398 Search in Google Scholar

26 Rinaldi R, De Bernardo C, Assumma M, Grammatico B, Buffone E, Poscente M, et al. Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of a de novo 4q24qter duplication and correlation to the associated phenotype. Am J Med Genet A. 2003; 118A(2): 122–126. RinaldiR De BernardoC AssummaM GrammaticoB BuffoneE PoscenteM Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of a de novo 4q24qter duplication and correlation to the associated phenotype Am J Med Genet A 2003 118A 2 122 126 10.1002/ajmg.a.1009312655492 Search in Google Scholar

27 van Bon BW, Mefford HC, Menten B, Koolen DA, Sharp AJ, Nillesen WM, et al. Further delineation of the 15q13 microdeletion and duplication syndromes: A clinical spectrum varying from non-pathogenic to a severe outcome. J Med Genet. 2009; 46(8): 511–523. van BonBW MeffordHC MentenB KoolenDA SharpAJ NillesenWM Further delineation of the 15q13 microdeletion and duplication syndromes: A clinical spectrum varying from non-pathogenic to a severe outcome J Med Genet 2009 46 8 511 523 10.1136/jmg.2008.063412339537219372089 Search in Google Scholar

28 Türkyılmaz A, Yaralı O. A very rare partial trisomy syndrome: De novo duplication of 16q12.1q23.3 in a Turkish girl with developmental delay and facial dysmorphic features. Balkan J Med Genet. 2020; 23(1): 103–108. TürkyılmazA YaralıO A very rare partial trisomy syndrome: De novo duplication of 16q12.1q23.3 in a Turkish girl with developmental delay and facial dysmorphic features Balkan J Med Genet 2020 23 1 103 108 10.2478/bjmg-2020-0009747422232953418 Search in Google Scholar

29 D’Arrigo S, Gavazzi F, Alfei E, Zuffardi O, Montomoli C, Corso B, et al. The diagnostic yield of array comparative genomic hybridization is high regardless of severity of intellectual disability/developmental delay in children. J Child Neurol. 2016; 31(6): 691–699. D’ArrigoS GavazziF AlfeiE ZuffardiO MontomoliC CorsoB The diagnostic yield of array comparative genomic hybridization is high regardless of severity of intellectual disability/developmental delay in children J Child Neurol 2016 31 6 691 699 10.1177/088307381561356226511719 Search in Google Scholar

30 Shevell M, Ashwal S, Donley D, Flint J, Gingold M, Hirtz D, et al. Practice parameter: Evaluation of the child with global developmental delay: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2003; 60(3): 367–380. ShevellM AshwalS DonleyD FlintJ GingoldM HirtzD Practice parameter: Evaluation of the child with global developmental delay: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society Neurology 2003 60 3 367 380 10.1212/01.WNL.0000031431.81555.1612578916 Search in Google Scholar