Withdrawal from a Human Rights Treaty and Peremptory Norms of International Law: The case of “Belarus 2020”

3 Amnesty International. “Unacceptably Limiting Human Rights Protection.” (March 1999) // https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/amr050011999en.pdf Search in Google Scholar

4 Aust, Anthony. Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd edn. CUP: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

5 Bialiatski, Ales. “The Nobel Peace Lecture.” (December 2022) // https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2022/bialiatski/lecture/". Search in Google Scholar

6 Belarusian And International Civil Society. “Belarusian authorities must not withdraw Belarus from First Optional Protocol of the ICCPR.” (August 2022) // https://humanrightshouse.org/statements/belarusian-authorities-must-not-withdraw-belarus-from-first-optional-protocol-of-the-iccpr/ Search in Google Scholar

7 Belgium v. Senegal, Judgment, I.C.J., 2012, ICJ GL No 144. Search in Google Scholar

8 Binder, Christina, & Hofbauer, Jan. “The Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle or the Limits of Interpretation”: 58–77. In: The Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Judgment and Its Contribution to the Development of International Law. Brill, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

9 Cassese, Antonio. International Law. Oxford University Press, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

10 Coppen, Tom. “Good faith and withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty.” Question of International Law, QIL, Zoom in 2 (2014): 21–33 // http://www.qilqdi.org/good-faith-and-withdrawal-from-the-non-proliferation-treaty/ Search in Google Scholar

11 Council of Europe, Statute, European Treaty Series – 1949, Nos 1/6/7/8/11. Search in Google Scholar

12 David, Arie. The Strategy of Treaty Termination: Lawful Breaches and Retaliations. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975. Search in Google Scholar

13 Dissenting Opinion of Judge Tanaka, South West Africa, Judgement of 18 July 1066. ICJ Reports (1966): 298 // https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/47/047-19660718-JUD-01-06-EN.pdf Search in Google Scholar

14 Donnelly, Jack. “International human rights: a regime analysis.” International Organizations 40 (1986): 599–642. Search in Google Scholar

15 “Draft conclusion on identification and legal consequences of peremptory norms of general international law. International Law Commission.” Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II, Part Two (2022): 17–89. Search in Google Scholar

16 European Union. Belarus: Statement by the High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell on the constitutional referendum. (February 2022)// https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/belarus-statement-high-representativevice-president-josep-borrell-constitutional-referendum_en. Search in Google Scholar

17 Hahn, Hugo J. “Continuity in the Law of International Organization.” Duke Law Journal, Vol. 2 (1962): 379–423. Search in Google Scholar

18 Helfer, Laurence. “Terminating Treaties”: 634–649. In: Duncan Hollis, ed., The Oxford Guide to Treaties. Oxford University Press, 2012. Search in Google Scholar

19 Helfer, Laurence. “Exiting Treaties.” Virginia Law Review 91, (2005): 1579–1648. Search in Google Scholar

20 Human Rights House Foundation. Petition “Belarusian authorities must not withdraw Belarus from First Optional Protocol of the ICCPR.” (August 2022) // https://humanrightshouse.org/statements/belarusian-authorities-must-not-withdraw-belarus-from-first-optional-protocol-of-the-iccpr/ Search in Google Scholar

21 IWPR (Institute for war and peace reporting). Belarusian citizens denied justice at home may no longer be able to appeal to a last resort committee. (October 2022) // https://iwpr.net/global-voices/belarus-leave-un-human-rights-body. Search in Google Scholar

22 Klein, Eckart. “Denunciation of Human Rights Treaties and the Principle of Reciprocity”: 477–487. In: Ulrich Fastenrath and et al., eds,. From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma. Oxford, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

23 Laptsevich v. Belarus. CCPR/C/68/D/780/1997, UN Human Rights Committee. (April 2000) // https://www.refworld.org/cases,HRC,3f588efe3.html Search in Google Scholar

24 Lauterpacht, Hersch. The Development of International Law by the International Court. Cambridge University Press, 1958. Search in Google Scholar

25 Naldi, Gino & Magliveras, Konstantinos. “Human Rights and the Denunciation of Treaties and Withdrawal from International Organisations.” Polish Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 33 (2013): 95–127. Search in Google Scholar

26 OMCT (World Organization against Torture). Briefing of the on Belarus. 100 days of ongoing human rights crisis Facts & Figures. (December 2020) // https://www.omct.org/en/annual-report-2020/belarus. Search in Google Scholar

27 OSCE. Rapporteur under the Moscow Mechanism Professor Dr. Benedek W. Report on Alleged Human Rights Violations related to the Presidential Elections of 9 August 2020 in Belarus. (November 2020) // https://www.osce.org/odihr/469539 Search in Google Scholar

28 “Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes.” United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 596 (1963): 487. Search in Google Scholar

29 “Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, United Nations.” Treaty Series, Vol. 999 (1966): 171 // https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3bf0.html Search in Google Scholar

30 Pocar, Fausto.“Some Remarks on the Continuity of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law Treaties”: 279–294. In: Enzo Cannizzaro, ed., The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention. Oxford Academic, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

31 Reinhold, Steven. “Good Faith in International Law.” UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 2(1)(2013): 40–63. Search in Google Scholar

32 “Belarus referendum approves proposal to renounce non-nuclear status – agencies.” Reuters (February, 2022) // https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/launchpad-russias-assault-ukraine-belarus-holds-referendum-renounce-non-nuclear-2022-02-27 Search in Google Scholar

33 Rosenne, Shabtai. Breach of Treaty. Cambridge: Grotius publications, 1985. Search in Google Scholar

34 Russo, Debohra. “Procedural obligations and good faith: the case of the human rights treaties.” Question of International Law, QIL. ZOOM in 2, (2014): 35–44. Search in Google Scholar

35 Scheuner, Ulrich. “Conflict of Treaty Provisions with a Peremptory Norm of General International Law and its Consequences. Comments on Art. 50, 61 and 67 of the ILC´s. Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties.” Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (1967): 520–532 // http://www.zaoerv.de Search in Google Scholar

36 Schiffrin, Natalia. “Jamaica Withdraws the Right of Individual Petition under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.” American Journal of International Law 92(3) (1998): 563–568 // doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2997931 Search in Google Scholar

37 Tomuschat, Christian. “General International Law: A New Source of International Law?”: 185–204. In: Global Justice, Human Rights and the Modernization of International Law. Springer, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

38 Ulyashyna, Liudmila. “Individual v. State: Submissin, equality, conflict?”: 15–40. In: Individual v. State: Practice on Complaints with the United Nations treaty bodies with regard to the Republic of Belarus. Vilnius, 2014 // http://humanrightshouse.org/noop-media/documents/21937.pdf Search in Google Scholar

39 Ulyashyna, Liudmila. International Legal Standards in the Human Rights Regime and their realization (in Russian: Mezdunarodnye standarty v oblasti prav cheloveka i ih realisacija). Vilnius, EHU, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

40 United Nations. Charter of the United Nations, 1945, No. 1, UNTS XVI. Search in Google Scholar

41 UN. Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Report “On The Promotion And Protection Of Human Rights.” E/CN.4/2000/2, E/ CN.2/1999/54 (August, 1999) // https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f4ac4.html Search in Google Scholar

42 UN. Human Rights Committee (HRC). CCPR General Comments “Continuity of Obligations.” CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.8/Rev.1, No. 26 (1997) // https://www.ref-world.org/docid/453883fde.html Search in Google Scholar

43 UN. Human Rights Council. Resolution “On human rights situation in Belarus in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election and in its aftermath.” No. A/HRC/ RES/49/26. (April 1, 2022) // https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G22/303/52/PDF/G2230352.pdf?OpenElement Search in Google Scholar

44 UN. Special Rapporteur on situation with human rights in Belarus “Situation of human rights in Belarus.” No. A/77/195 (July 2022) // https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N22/432/95/PDF/N2243295.pdf?OpenElemen Search in Google Scholar

45 UN. Press-relies of treaties bodies. Belarus’ withdrawal from individual complaints procedure is a serious setback for human rights protection, UN Human Rights Committee says. (November, 2022) // https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2022/11/belarus-withdrawal-individual-complaints-procedure-serious-setback-human Search in Google Scholar

46 UN. High Commissioner for Human Rights. Belarus in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election and in its aftermath. No. A/HRC/49/71 (2022) // https://daccess-ods.un.org/tmp/1728628.27777863.html Search in Google Scholar

47 UN. Human Rights Council. Resolution “On the situation of human rights in Belarus in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election and in its aftermath.” No. A/HRC/RES/45/1 (2020) // https://documents-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G20/235/35/PDF/G2023535.pdf?OpenElement Search in Google Scholar

48 UN. High Commissioner for human rights. Report “On the situation of human rights in Belarus in the context of the 2020 presidential election.” No. A/HRC/46/4 (2020) // https://documents-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G21/032/81/PDF/G2103281.pdf?OpenElement Search in Google Scholar

49 UN. Human Rights Committee. Aide Memoire “Denunciation of the PIDCP by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.” No.C.N.467.1997.TREATIES-10 (1997) // https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/1997/CN.467.1997-Eng.pdf Search in Google Scholar

50 UN. The Sub Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Re solution “Continuing of obligations under international human rights treaties.” No. E/CN.4/SUB.2/RES/1999/5 (1999) // https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/alldocs.aspx?doc_id=8161 Search in Google Scholar

51 UN. Human Rights Committee. CCPR General Comment No. 24: Issues Relating to Reservations Made upon Ratification or Accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols thereto, or in Relation to Declarations under Article 41 of the Covenant. No. HRI/GEN/1/ Rev.3 (1997) // https://www.refworld.org/docid/453883fc11.html Search in Google Scholar

52 UN. Human Rights Committee, Katsora v Belarus. Communication No. 1377/2005, 2010, No. Doc. CCPR/C/99/D/1377/2005 // http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/1377-2005.html Search in Google Scholar

53 UN. Human Rights Committee. Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Belarus. No. CCPR/C/BLR/CO/5 (2018) // https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1649136?ln=en Search in Google Scholar

54 UN. Human Rights Council Resolution. Report “On human rights situation in Belarus.” No. A/HRC/RES/20/13 (2012) // https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G12/153/60/PDF/G1215360.pdf?OpenElement Search in Google Scholar

55 UN. Human Rights Committee. Rules of procedure of the HR Committee amended at the 126th session. No. CCPR/C/3/Rev (2021) // https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2FC%2F3%-2FRev.12&Lang=en Search in Google Scholar

56 UN. Human Rights Committee. CCPR General Comment No. 26: “Continuity of Obligations.” No. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.8/Rev.1 (1997) // http://www.refworld.org/docid/453883fde.html Search in Google Scholar

57 UN. Human Rights Committee, General Comment 31 (2004). Nature of the General Legal Obligation on States Parties to the Covenant. No. 31(80) (2004) // https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/533996?ln=en Search in Google Scholar

58 Vashkevich, Aleksandr. The First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Scientific-practical comment. Minsk: Positive Center, 2016. Search in Google Scholar