1. bookTom 13 (2020): Zeszyt 1 (June 2020)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2029-0454
Pierwsze wydanie
05 Feb 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?

Data publikacji: 23 Oct 2020
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 13 (2020) - Zeszyt 1 (June 2020)
Zakres stron: 191 - 217
Otrzymano: 11 May 2020
Przyjęty: 31 Jul 2020
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2029-0454
Pierwsze wydanie
05 Feb 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

1. ABA Commission on the Future of Legal Services. “Report on the Future of Legal Services in the United States” (2016) // https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/images/abanews/2016FLSReport_FNL_WEB.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. ABA Task Force on the Future of Legal Education. “Report and Recommendations” (2014) //http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/report_and_recommendations_of_aba_task_force.authcheckdam.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

3. Asimov, Isaac. “Visit to the World’s Fair of 2014.” N.Y. Times (Aug. 16, 1964) // http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/03/23/lifetimes/asi-v-fair.html.Search in Google Scholar

4. Balliester, Thereza, and Adam Elsheikhi. “The Future of Work: A Literature Review.” ILO Research Department Working Paper No. 29 (2018).Search in Google Scholar

5. Baude, William, et al. “Making Doctrinal Work More Rigorous: Lessons from Systematic Reviews.” University of Chicago Law Review 84 (2017): 37–58.Search in Google Scholar

6. Bras, Rafael L., and Richard A. DeMillo. “The leadership challenges for higher education’s digital future”: 39–56. In: James Soton Antony, Ana Mari Cauce, and Donna E. Shalala, eds. Challenges in Higher Education Leadership. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

7. Canick, Simon. “Infusing Technology Skills into the Law School Curriculum.” Cap. U. L. Rev. 42 (2014): 663–708.Search in Google Scholar

8. Council of the European Union. “European Council meeting conclusions” (EUCO 14/17, 2017) // https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21620/19-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

9. Delbrück, Jost. “The Right to Education as an International Human Right.” German Yearbook of International Law 35 (1992): 92–104.Search in Google Scholar

10. Easterbrook, Frank H. “Cyberspace and the Law of the Horse.” U. Chi. Leg. F. 207 (1996).Search in Google Scholar

11. European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. “Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI” (2019) // https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.Search in Google Scholar

12. European Commission. “A concept paper on digitisation, employability and inclusiveness. The role of Europe” (2017) // http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/document.cfm?doc_id=44515.Search in Google Scholar

13. European Commission. “Reflection Paper on Harnessing Globalization” (COM/2017/240 final) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2017%3A240%3AFIN.Search in Google Scholar

14. European Commission. “Reflection Paper on the Social Dimension of Europe” (COM/2017/206 final) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:cea6403b-2b4c-11e7-9412-01aa75ed71a1.0017.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.Search in Google Scholar

15. Fomin, Vladislav V. “AI in the Context of Regulation of Smart Technology Services.” ATEITIS workshop presentation at Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania (Sep. 21, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

16. Gruodytė, Edita, and Julija Kiršienė. “Legal Education in Lithuania: Guidelines for Quality Improvement in Accordance with the Bologna Process.” Inžinerinė ekonomika 22 (2011): 356–366 // DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.22.4.711.10.5755/j01.ee.22.4.711Search in Google Scholar

17. International Labour Conference. “ILO Centenary Declaration for the Future of Work.” 108th Session of the International Labour Conference (Jun. 21, 2019) // https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/mission-and-objectives/centenary-declaration/lang--en/index.htm.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kerikmäe, Tanel, Thomas Hoffmann, and Archil Chochia. “Legal Technology for Law Firms: Determining Roadmaps for Innovation.” Croat. Int. Rel. Rev. 24 (2018): 91–112 // https://doi.org/10/gfwp5q.10.2478/cirr-2018-0005Search in Google Scholar

19. Koo, Gene. “New Skills, New Learning: Legal Education and the Promise of Technology.” Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2007-4 (2007) // http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.976646.10.2139/ssrn.976646Search in Google Scholar

20. Law Society of England and Wales. “Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession – Horizon Scanning Report” (2018) // https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/research-trends/horizon-scanning/artificial-intelligence/.Search in Google Scholar

21. Law Society of New South Wales. “The Future of Law and Innovation in the Profession” (2017) // https://www.lawsociety.com.au/sites/default/files/2018-03/1272952.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

22. Lee, Jootaek. “The Human Right to Education: Definition, Research and Annotated Bibliography.” Emory International Law Review 34(3) (2019): 1–49 // https://ssrn.com/abstract=3489328.Search in Google Scholar

23. Lessig, Lawrence. “The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach.” Harv. L. Rev. 113 (1999): 501–546.10.2307/1342331Search in Google Scholar

24. Maharg, Paul, and Emma Nicol. “Simulation and Technology in Legal Education: A Systematic Review and Future Research Program.” In: Caroline Strevens, et al., eds. Legal Education. Simulation in Theory and Practice. Ashgate, Farnham, UK, 2014 // https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1911.3129.Search in Google Scholar

25. Méda, Dominique. “The Future of Work: The Meaning and Value of Work in Europe.” ILO Research Paper No. 18 (2018).Search in Google Scholar

26. Microsoft. “Future Computed. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Society” (2018) // https://blogs.microsoft.com/uploads/2018/02/The-Future-Computed_2.8.18.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

27. Moher, David, et al. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement.” Systematic Revs. 4 (2015) // doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.10.1186/2046-4053-4-1Search in Google Scholar

28. Mountain, Darryl R. “Disrupting Conventional Law Firm Business Models Using Document Assembly.” Int. J. L. Info. Tech. 15 (2006): 170–191 // https://doi.org/10/djkxjr.10.1093/ijlit/eal019Search in Google Scholar

29. Nübler, Irmgard. “New Technologies: A Jobless Future or a Golden Age of Job Creation?” ILO Research Department Working Paper No. 13 (2016).Search in Google Scholar

30. OECD. “Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills” (2016) // https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en.10.1787/9789264265097-enSearch in Google Scholar

31. Piper, Rory J. “How to Write a Systematic Literature Review: A Guide for Medical Students.” National AMR, Fostering Medical Research 1 (2013) // https://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/curesmed/files/2014/10/NSAMR-Systematic-Review.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

32. Ribstein, Larry E. “The Death of Big Law.” Wisc. L. R. 2010, no. 3 (2010): 749–815 // https://doi.org/10/fznz5c.Search in Google Scholar

33. Schwab, Klaus. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means, How to Respond.” World Economic Forum (Jan. 14, 2016) // https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/.Search in Google Scholar

34. “Shaping Digitalisation for an Interconnected World.” G20 Digital Economy Ministerial Declaration (2017) // https://unctad.org/meetings/en/Contribution/dtl_eWeek2017c02-G20_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

35. “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG)” (2015) // https://enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

36. Susskind, Richard, and Daniel Susskind. The Future of the Professions: How Technology will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford University Press, 2015.10.1093/oso/9780198713395.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

37. Susskind, Richard. The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the nature of legal services. Oxford University Press, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

38. Susskind, Richard. Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future. Oxford University Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

39. “Times Higher Education World University Rankings” (2020) // https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2020/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/-1/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/scores.Search in Google Scholar

40. Tomaševski, Katerina. “Human Rights Obligations: Making Education Available, Accessible, Acceptable and Adaptable.” Right to Education Primers 3 (2001): 1–43 // ttps://www.right-to-education.org/sites/right-to-education.org/files/resource-attachments/Tomasevski_Primer%203.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

41. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). “General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education (Art. 13 of the Covenant), Paragraph 6” (December 1999) // http://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838c22.html.Search in Google Scholar

42. UNESCO. “The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the SDGs” // https://sdg4education2030.org/the-goal.Search in Google Scholar

43. Van der Wende, Marijk. “The Emergence of Liberal Arts and Sciences Education in Europe: A Comparative Perspective.” Higher Education Policy 24 (2011): 233–253 // DOI: 10.1057/hep.2011.3.10.1057/hep.2011.3Search in Google Scholar

44. Veith, Christian, et al. “How Legal Technology Will Change the Business of Law.” Boston Consulting Group and Bucerius Law School (2016) // https://www.law-school.de/article/new-study-how-legal-technology-will-change-the-business-of-law/.Search in Google Scholar

45. Walter, Katie. “Six Ways Law Schools Can Make Students More Practice Ready.” Thomson Reuters (2017) // http://www.legalexecutiveinstitute.com/six-ways-law-schools-students/.Search in Google Scholar

46. Yannascoli, Sarah M., et al. “How to Write a Systematic Review: A Step-by-Step Guide.” U. Penn. Orth. J. 23 (2013).Search in Google Scholar

1. Communication from the Commission Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. COM/2010/2020 final // https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF.Search in Google Scholar

2. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. COM/2015/192 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52015DC0192.Search in Google Scholar

3. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A Renewed EU Agenda for Higher Education. COM/2017/0247 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52017DC0247.Search in Google Scholar

4. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Digital Education Action Plan. COM/2018/022 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2018:22:FIN.Search in Google Scholar

5. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A New Skills Agenda for Europe. Working Together to Strengthen Human Capital, Employability and Competitiveness. COM/2016/0381 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0381.Search in Google Scholar

6. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Youth on the Move. An Initiative to Unleash the Potential of Young People to Achieve Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in the European Union. COM/2010/477 final // https://europa.eu/youthonthemove/docs/communication/youth-on-the-move_EN.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

7. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A Digital Agenda for Europe. COM/2010/245 final // https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF.Search in Google Scholar

8. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Artificial Intelligence for Europe. COM/2018/237 final // https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-artificial-intelligence-europe.Search in Google Scholar

9. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Building Trust in Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence. COM/2019/168 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:0168:FIN.Search in Google Scholar

10. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

11. Council of the European Union Recommendation 2018/C 189/01 on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. May 22, 2018 // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&from=EN.Search in Google Scholar

12. Descriptor of the Study Field of Law, Approved by Order No. V-831 of the Minister of Education and Sciences of the Republic of Lithuania of 23 July 2015.Search in Google Scholar

13. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14. Council of Europe, 4 November 1950.Search in Google Scholar

14. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. UN General Assembly, 1966, resolution no. 2200A (XXI).Search in Google Scholar

15. Law on Higher Education and Research of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2009, no. 54-2140.Search in Google Scholar

16. Niemietz v. Germany. 251 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) (1992).Search in Google Scholar

17. Sidabras and Džiautas v. Lithuania. Eur. Ct. H.R. 395 (2004).Search in Google Scholar

18. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania Ruling on the Compliance of the Qualification Requirements of Higher Education in Law for the Persons Who Wish to Hold, Under Procedure Established by Laws, the Position of a Judge Approved by Government of the Republic of Lithuania Resolution no. 1568 “On Approving the Qualification Requirements of Higher Education in Law for the Persons Who Wish to Hold, Under Procedure Established By Laws, the Position of a Judge” of 4 October 2002 with Paragraph 1 (wording of 24 January 2002, 18 May 2004, 1 June 2006) of Article 51 of the Republic of Lithuania Law on Courts and Paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Republic of Lithuania Law on the Entry Into Force and Implementation of the Law on Amending the Law on Courts. 2008, no.19/05.Search in Google Scholar

19. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. General Assembly. 1948, Resolution No. 217A.Search in Google Scholar

20. UNESCO Convention against Discrimination in Education. 1960.Search in Google Scholar

21. UNESCO Recommendation on Adult Learning and Education. 2016.Search in Google Scholar

22. United States v. Carroll Towing Co. 159 F.2d 169 (2d. Cir. 1947).Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo