Otwarty dostęp

The Montreal Convention of 1999 and Regulation No 261/2004 in the EUCJ and National Case Law


Zacytuj

1. Bobek, Michal, and Jeremias Prassl. Air Passenger Rights. Ten Years On. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

2. Dempsey, Paul, and Johansson O. Svante. “Montreal v. Brussels: The Conflict of Laws on the Issue of Delay in International Air Carriage.” Air and Space Law 35 (2010): 207–225.10.54648/AILA2010022Search in Google Scholar

3. Dempsey, Paul, and Michael Milde. International Air Carrier Liability: The Montreal Convention of 1999. Canada: McGill University, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

4. Kinga, Arnold. “Application of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 on Denied Boarding, Cancellation and Long Delay of Flights.” Air and Space Law 32 (2007): 93–107.10.54648/AILA2007013Search in Google Scholar

5. Larsen, Paul, Joseph B. Sweeney, and John Gillick. Aviation Law: Cases, Laws and Related Sources. 2nd edition. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012.10.1163/9789004219267Search in Google Scholar

6. Milde, Michael. Essential Air and Space Law. Eleven: International Publishing, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

7. Wegter, J. Jorn. “The ECJ Decision of 10 January 2006 on the Validity of Regulation 261/2004: Ignoring the Exclusivity of the Montreal Convention.” Air and Space Law 31 2 (2006): 133–148.10.54648/AILA2006013Search in Google Scholar

1. Air Baltic Corporation AS v. Lietuvos Respublikos specialiųjų tyrimų tarnyba. (C-429/14) EU:C:2016:88 [2016].Search in Google Scholar

2. Air France SA v. Heinz-Gerke Folkerts, Luz-Tereza Folkerts. (C-11/11) EU:C:2013:106 [2013].Search in Google Scholar

3. Andrejs Eglītis, Edvards Ratnieks v. Latvijas Republikas Ekonomikas ministrija. (C-294/10) EU:C:2011:303 [2011].Search in Google Scholar

4. Aurora Sousa Rodríguez, Yago López Sousa, Rodrigo Manuel Puga Lueiro Luis Ángel Rodríguez González, María del Mar Pato Barreiro, Manuel López Alonso, Yaiza Pato Rodríguez v. Air France SA. (C-83/10) EU:C:2011:652 [2011].Search in Google Scholar

5. Axel Walz v Clickair SA. (C-63/09) EU:C:2010:251 [2010].10.1016/S1773-035X(10)70613-4Search in Google Scholar

6. Christopher Sturgeon, Gabriel Sturgeon, Alana Sturgeon v. Condor Flugdienst GmbH. (C-402/07) EU:C:2009:716 [2009].Search in Google Scholar

7. Claudia Wegener v Royal Air Maroc SA. (C-537/17) EU:C:2018:361 [2018].Search in Google Scholar

8. Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air (the Montreal Convention). Official Journal L 194, 18/07/2001 P. 0039 –0049.Search in Google Scholar

9. Corina van der Lans v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV. (C-257/14) EU:C:2015:618 [2015].Search in Google Scholar

10. D. S., V. S. v. Tez Tour. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2013, No 3K-3-454.Search in Google Scholar

11. Denise McDonagh v. Ryanair Ltd. (C-12/11) EU:C:2013:43 [2013].10.1016/S1365-6937(13)70442-8Search in Google Scholar

12. Emeka Nelson, Bill Chinazo Nelson, Brian Cheimezie Nelson v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG. (C-581/10) EU:C:2012:657 [2012].Search in Google Scholar

13. Emirates Airlines – Direktion für Deutschland v. Diether Schenkel. (C-173/07) EU:C:2008:400 [2008].Search in Google Scholar

14. Finnair Oyj v.Timy Lassooy. (C-22/11) EU:C:2012:604 [2012].10.3740/MRSK.2012.22.11.604Search in Google Scholar

15. Friederike Wallentin-Hermann v. Alitalia – Linee Aeree Italiane SpA. (C-549/07) EU:C:2008:771 [2008].Search in Google Scholar

16. G. D., A. D., S. B. D. v. Tez Tour. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2013, No 3K-3-601.Search in Google Scholar

17. Germán Rodríguez Cachafeiro, María de los Reyes Martínez-Reboredo Varel Villamor v.Iberia, Líneas Aéreas de España SA. (C-321/11) EU:C:2012:609 [2012].Search in Google Scholar

18. Germanwings GmbH v.Ronny Henning. (C-542/13) EU:C:2014:2141.Search in Google Scholar

19. International Air Transport Association, European Low Fares Airline Association v. Department for Transport. (C-344/04) EU:C:2006:10 [2006].Search in Google Scholar

20. Joan Cuadrench Moré v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV. (C-139/11) EU:C:2012:741 [2012].Search in Google Scholar

21. Jones v. USA 3000 Airlines. 2009 U.S. District LEXIS 9049 (E.D.Mo. 2009).Search in Google Scholar

22. M. L. v. Air Baltic Corporation AS. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2009, No 3K-3-541.Search in Google Scholar

23. Marcela Pešková, Jiří Peška v. Travel Service a.s. (C-315/15) EU:C:2017:342 [2017].Search in Google Scholar

24. Opinion of Advocate General Bot. Delivered on 28 July 2016.Search in Google Scholar

25. Opinion of Advocate General M. L.A. Geelhoed. Delivered on 8 September 2005.Search in Google Scholar

26. Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston. Delivered on 27 September 2007.Search in Google Scholar

27. Peter Rehder v. Air Baltic Corporation. (C-204/08) EU:C:2009:439 [2009].Search in Google Scholar

28. R. G., A. G., A. J., v. “Palangos Avia”, “Aurela”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2008, No 3K-7-43.Search in Google Scholar

29. R. O. D. v. Air Baltic Corporation AS. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2014, No 3K-3-403.Search in Google Scholar

30. Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (Text with EEA relevance) - Commission Statement. Official Journal L 046, 17/02/2004 P. 0001 – 0008.Search in Google Scholar

31. Sandy Siewert, Emma Siewert, Nele Siewert v. Condor Flugdienst GmbH. (C-394/14) EU:C:2014:2377 [2014].Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2029-0454
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
2 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Prawo, inne, Nauki społeczne, Politologia