[1. American Electroencephalographic Society (1994) Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J. Clin. Neurophysiol, 11: 111-113. 1.10.1097/00004691-199401000-00014]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bandura, A. (1977) Social learning theory. Pearson: London.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bandura, A. (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev., 84: 191-215.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Donchin, E., L. Cohen (1967) Averaged evoked potentials and intramodality selective attention. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 22: 537-546.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Dubal, S., A. Pierson, R. Jouvent (2000) Focused attention in anhedonia: a P3 study. Psychophysiol., 37: 711-714.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Gooey, K., O. Bradfield, O.J. Talbot, J.D.L. Morgan, D.L.U. Proske (2000) Effects of body orientation, load and vibration on sensing position and movement at the human elbow joint. Exp. Brain. Res., 133: 340--348.10.1007/s00221000038010958524]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Kogoj, A., Z. Pirtosek, M. Tomori, D.B. Vodusek (2005) Event-related potentials elicited by distractors in an auditory oddball paradigm in schizophrenia. Psychiatry. Res., 137: 49-59.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Kok, A. (2001) On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiol., 38: 557-577.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Kramer, A.F., E.J. Sirevaag, P.R. Hughes (1988) Effects of foveal task load on visual-spatial attention: eventrelated brain potentials and performance. Psychophysiol., 25: 512-531.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Nara, M., A. Saito, T. Kumagai, A. Sumi, (2007) The effects of subjective discriminability on P300 of event -related potentials. Mejiro. J. Psychol., 3: 41-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Picton, T.W., S. Bentin, P. Berg, E. Donchin, S.A. Hillyard, R. Johnson Jr, G.A. Miller, W. Ritter, D.S. Ruchkin, M.D. Rugg, M.J. Taylor (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiol., 37: 127-152.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Sakairi, Y., H. Tokuda, M. Kawahara, T. Tanigi, H. Soya (2003) Development of the two dimension mood scale for measuring psychological arousal level and hedonic tone. Bull. Inst. Health. Sport. Sci., Univers Tsukuba, 26: 27-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Sakata M, M. Shiba, M. Tadenuma (2002) Recognition of KANSEI information on body expression. Analysis of estimation of impression and eye movement. Eizo. Joho. Media. Gakkai. Gijutsu. Hokoku, 26: 9-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Shibayama, K., G. Naruse (1980) An analysis of motor action space in motor memory. Res. Bull. Educ. Psychol., Fac. Educ., Kyushu University, 25: 61-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Shibayama, K., G. Naruse (1982) An examination of motor action space in location reproduction: on the influence of movement distance. Res. Bull. Of. Educ. Psychol., Fac. Educ., Kyushu University, 26: 67-74.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Shibayama, K. (1983) Location and distance cues of motor space in movement reproduction. Shinrigaku. Kenkyu. 54: 321-324. DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.54.321.10.4992/jjpsy.54.321]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Vinter. A., E. Chartrel (2010) Effects of different types of learning on handwriting movements in young children. Learn. Instr., 20: 476-486.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Wakisaka K., S. Hashimoto (2012) Effect of difficulty of stroop tasks on P300 amplitude and latency: one word task on five colors and five words task on five colors. Jpn. J. Phys. Anthr., 17: 23-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Wickens, C., A. Kramer, L. Vanasse, E. Donchin (1983) Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science, 221: 1080-1082.10.1126/science.68792076879207]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Williams, J.G., N. Roku (1995) The present condition of motor learning research based on modeling theory. J. Health. Phys. Educ. Recreat., 45: 477-480.]Search in Google Scholar
