[Ambrus, Z.–Kósa, I.–Zsigmond, Cs. D. (2011). Infl uenţa simbolului video asupra preferinţei ştirilor online. In: Iluţ, P. (ed.), Studii de sociopsihologie. Cluj-Napoca: University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Babbie, E. (1996). A társadalomtudományi kutatás elmélete és gyakorlata. Budapest: Balassi.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: 10.1002/9781118619179.10.1002/9781118619179]Search in Google Scholar
[Brehm, S. S.–Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York, NY: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillard, J. P.–Peck, E. (2001). Persuasion and the Structure of Affect: Dual Systems and Discrete Emotions as Complementary Models. Human Communication Research 27(1): 38–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00775.x.10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00775.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillard, J. P.–Shen, L. (2005). On the Nature of Reactance and Its Role in Persuasive Health Communication. Communication Monographs 72(2): 144–168. DOI: 10.1080/03637750500111815.10.1080/03637750500111815]Search in Google Scholar
[Eisinga, R.–Grotenhuis, M.–Pelzer, B. (2013). The Reliability of a Two-Item Scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman–Brown? International Journal of Public Health 58(4): 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3.10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, M. G.–Sheeran, P.–Noar, S. M. et al. (2017). A Brief Measure of Reactance to Health Warnings. J. Behav. Med. 40(3): 520–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9821-z.10.1007/s10865-016-9821-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Hayes, A. F.–Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But… Communication Methods and Measures 14(1): 1–24. DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629.10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629]Search in Google Scholar
[Hong, S. M. (1992). Hong Psychological Reactance Scale: A Further Factor Analytic Validation. Psychological Reports 70: 512–514. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.70.2.512.10.2466/pr0.1992.70.2.512]Search in Google Scholar
[Hong, S.-M.–Faedda, S. (1996). Refinement of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement 56(1): 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056001014.10.1177/0013164496056001014]Search in Google Scholar
[Hong, S. M.–Page, S. (1989). A Psychological Reactance Scale: Development, Factor Scale and Reliability. Psychological Reports 64: 1323–1326. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3c.1323 [Accessed on 6 November 2021].10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3c.1323]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelly, A. E.–Nauta, M. M. (1997). Reactance and Thought-Suppression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(11): 1123–1132.10.1177/01461672972311001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, H. J.–Lee, H.–Hong, H. (2020). Scale Development and Validation for Psychological Reactance to Health Promotion Messages. Sustainability 12(14): 5816. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145816.10.3390/su12145816]Search in Google Scholar
[Kjell, O. N. E.–Diener, E. (2021). Abbreviated Three-Item Versions of the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Harmony in Life Scale Yield as Strong Psychometric Properties as the Original Scales. Journal of Personality Assessment 103(2): 183–194. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1737093.10.1080/00223891.2020.1737093]Search in Google Scholar
[Knobloch, S.–Hastall, M.–Zillmann, D.–Callison, C. (2003). Imagery Effects on the Selective Reading of Internet Newsmagazines. Communication Research 30(1): 3–29.10.1177/0093650202239023]Search in Google Scholar
[Knobloch, S.–Zillmann, D.–Gibson, R.–Karrh, J. A. (2002). Effects of Salient News Items on Information Acquisition and Issue Perception. Z. für Medienpsychologie 14(1): 14–22.10.1026//1617-6383.14.1.14]Search in Google Scholar
[Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2014). Choice and Preference in Media Use: Advances in Selective Exposure Theory and Research. Routledge.10.4324/9781315771359]Search in Google Scholar
[Knobloch-Westerwick, S.–Dillman Carpentier, F.–Blumhoff, A.–Nickel, N. (2005). Informational Utility Effects on Selective Exposure to Good and Bad News: A Cross-Cultural Investigation. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 82(1): 181–195.10.1177/107769900508200112]Search in Google Scholar
[Kósa, I.–Bálint, B.–Ambrus, Z.–Sólyom, A.–Zsigmond, Cs. D. (2020). Headlines Readers’ Avoidance Attitude towards Visual Material? Effects of the Camcorder Symbol on Selective Exposure to Headlines. KOME − An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry 8(2): 61–87. DOI: 10.17646/KOME.75672.48-10.17646/KOME.75672.48]Search in Google Scholar
[Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and Theory in the Study of Fear Communications. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press. Volume 5: 119–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60091-X.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60091-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Moreira, P.–Cunha, D.–Inman, R. A. (2020). Addressing a Need for Valid Measures of Trait Reactance in Adolescents: A Further Test of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 102(3): 357–369. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1585360.10.1080/00223891.2019.1585360]Search in Google Scholar
[Münnich, Á.–Hidegkuti, I. (2012). Strukturális egyenletek modelljei: oksági viszonyok és complex elméletek vizsgálata pszichológiai kutatásokban. Alkalmazott Pszichológia 1: 77–102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nagybányai Nagy, O. (2006a). A pszichológiai tesztek reliabilitása. In: Rózsa, S. et al. (eds.), A pszichológiai mérés alapjai. Elmélet, módszer és gyakorlati alkalmazás. Budapest: Bölcsész Konzorcium.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nagybányai Nagy, O. (2006b). A pszichológiai tesztek validitása. In: Rózsa S. et al. (eds.), A pszichológiai mérés alapjai. Elmélet, módszer és gyakorlati alkalmazás. Budapest: Bölcsész Konzorcium.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quick, B. L. (2012). What Is the Best Measure of Psychological Reactance? An Empirical Test of Two Measures. Health Communication 27(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2011.567446.10.1080/10410236.2011.567446]Search in Google Scholar
[Quick, B. L.–Considine, J. R. (2008). Examining the Use of Forceful Language When Designing Exercise Persuasive Messages for Adults: A Test of Conceptualizing Reactance Arousal as a Two-Step Process. Health Communication 23(5): 483–491. DOI: 10.1080/10410230802342150.10.1080/10410230802342150]Search in Google Scholar
[Quick, B. L.–Stephenson, M. T. (2008). Examining the Role of Trait Reactance and Sensation Seeking on Perceived Threat, State Reactance, and Reactance Restoration. Human Communication Research 34(3): 448–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00328.x.10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00328.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Rains, S. A.–Turner, M. M. (2007). Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication: A Test and Extension of the Intertwined Model. Human Communication Research 33(2): 241–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00298.x.10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00298.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynolds-Tylus, T. (2019). Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communi cation: A Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Communication 4(56): 1–12. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056.10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056]Search in Google Scholar
[Sandy, C. J.–Gosling, S. D.–Schwartz, S. H.–Koelkebeck, T. (2017). The Development and Validation of Brief and Ultrabrief Measures of Values. Journal of Personality Assessment 99(5): 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1231115.10.1080/00223891.2016.1231115]Search in Google Scholar
[Sargent, S. L. (2007). Image Effects on Selective Exposure to Computer-Mediated News Stories. Computers in Human Behavior 23(1): 705–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.005.10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Seltzer, L. F. (1983). Influencing the “Shape” of Resistance: An Experimental Exploration of Paradoxical Directives and Psychological Reactance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 4(1): 47–71. DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp0401_5.10.1207/s15324834basp0401_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Shen, L.–Dillard, J. P. (2005). Psychometric Properties of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 85(1): 74–81. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07. PMID: 16083386.10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07]Search in Google Scholar
[Stephenson, M. T. (2003). Examining Adolescents’ Responses to Antimarijuana PSAs. Human Communication Research 29(3): 343–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00843.x.10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00843.x]Search in Google Scholar
[White, G. L.–Zimbardo. P. G. (1980). The Effects of Threat of Surveillance and Actual Surveillance on Expressed Opinions toward Marijuana. The Journal of Social Psychology 111(1): 49–61. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1980.9924272.10.1080/00224545.1980.9924272]Search in Google Scholar
[Witte, K. (1992). Putting the Fear Back into Fear Appeals: The Extended Parallel Process Model. Communication Monographs 59(4): 329–349. DOI: 10.1080/03637759209376276.10.1080/03637759209376276]Search in Google Scholar
[Ziegler, M.–Kemper, C. J.–Kruyen, P. (2014). Short Scales – Five Misunderstandings and Ways to Overcome Them. [Editorial]. Journal of Individual Differences 35(4): 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000148.10.1027/1614-0001/a000148]Search in Google Scholar
[Zillmann, D.–Gibson, R.–Sargent, S. L. (1999). Effects of Photographs in News-Magazine Reports on Issue Perception. Media Psychology 1(3): 207–228.10.1207/s1532785xmep0103_2]Search in Google Scholar