[
1. Sager, T. Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990–2010. Progress in Planning, 2011, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 147–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2011.09.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Soja, E. The city and spatial justice. Justice spatiale/Spatial justice, 2009, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–5. https://www.jssj.org/article/la-ville-et-la-justice-spatiale/?lang=en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Nedović-Budić, Z. Adjustment of planning practice to the new Eastern and Central European context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2001, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976354
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Poljak Istenič, S., Kozina, J. Participatory planning in a post-socialist urban context: experience from five cities in Central and Eastern Europe. Participatory Research and Planning in Practice, 2020, pp. 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28014-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Kotus, J., Sowada, T., Rzeszewski, M., Mańkowska, P. Anatomy of place-making in the context of the communication processes: a story of one community and one square in a post-socialist city. Quaestiones Geographicae, 2019, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 51–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Wang, X., van Wart, M. When public participation in administration leads to trust: an empirical assessment of managers’ perception. Public Administration Review, 2007, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00712.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Inytė, V. Ypatinga atmosfera alsuojančios Kauno gatvės gyventojai pokyčių vengia dėl svarbios priežasties, 2019 [online, cited 18.03.2022]. https://www.lrytas.lt/bustas/architektura/2019/03/03/news/ypatinga-atmosfera-alsuojancios-kauno-gatves-gyventojai-pokyciu-vengia-del-svarbios-priezasties-9342840
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Genius Loci, 2022 [cited 15.04.2022]. https://sanciubendruomene.lt/en/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Lynch, K. The image of the city. MIT Press, 1960, 208 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Ståhle, A. Sociotope mapping: exploring public open space and its multiple use values in urban and landscape planning practice. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 2006, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 59–71. http://arkitekturforskning.net/na/article/download/134/105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Alexander, C. A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press, 1977, 1166 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. International Design Foundation. 5 stages in the Design Thinking process, 2019 [cited 14.03.2022]. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Zaleckis, K., Vitkuviene, J., Jankauskaite-Jureviciene, L., Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I., Karvelyte-Balbieriene, V. Community involvement in place-making: Present Map Methodology. Architecture and Urban Planning, 2023, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 29–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2023-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Zaleckis, K., Vitkuviene, J., Jankauskaite-Jureviciene, L., Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I., Karvelyte-Balbieriene, V. Charting people, activities, and places. Present Map workshop in public spaces. In: Machado e Moura, C., Milián Bernal, D., Restrepo, E., Havik, K., Niculae, L. (Eds.) Repository. 49 Methods and assignments for writing urban places. nai0I0publishers, 202, pp. 42–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Gura, T. Citizen science: amateur experts. Nature, 2013, vol. 496, pp. 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7444-259a
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Zaleckis, K., Vitkuviene, J., Jankauskaite-Jureviciene, L., Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I., Karvelyte-Balbieriene, V. Understanding community perspective on the heritage of locality: Memory Map Methodology. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, In Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Vitkuvienė, J., Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, I., Zaleckis, K., Tranavičiutė, B. Serious game and serious play concepts in the content analysis of urban spaces. Architecture and Urban Planning, 2019, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 30–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2019-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Brown, G., Chin, S. Y. W. Assessing the effectiveness of public participation in neighbourhood planning. Planning Practice and Research, 2013, vol. 28, no.5, pp. 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2013.820037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Faehnle, M., Tyrväinen, L. A framework for evaluating and designing collaborative planning. Land Use Policy, 2013, vol. 34, pp. 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Gieseking, J. J. Where we go from here: the mental sketch mapping method and its analytic components. Qualitative Inquiry, 2013, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 712–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413500926
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Lee, M. Y., Hitchcock M., Lei, J. W. Mental mapping and heritage visitors’ spatial perceptions. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 2018, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2017.1350187
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Łaszkiewicz, E., Czembrowski P., Kronenberg, J. Creating a map of the social functions of urban green spaces in a city with poor availability of spatial data: a sociotope for Lodz. Land, 2020, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9060183
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Mehaffy, M. W., Kryazheva, Y., Rudd, Y. A., Salingaros, N. A. A New pattern language for growing regions: places, networks, processes. Sustasis Press, 2019, 363 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Diethelm, J. Embodied design thinking. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2019, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
, , 