[
1. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division, UN Proceedings, New York, 2019 [online, cited 05.05.2020]. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Mangone, G., Capaldi, C.A., van Allen, Z. M., Luscuere, P. G. Bringing nature to work: Preferences and perceptions of constructed indoor and natural outdoor workspaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 23, 2017, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.00910.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Gjerland, A., Søiland, E., Thuen, F. Office concepts: A scoping review. Building and Environment, Vol. 163, 2019, 106294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.10629410.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106294
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. van der Ploeg, H. P, Chey, T., Korda, R.J., Banks, E., Bauman, A. Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222497 Australian adults. Arch Intern Med, Vol. 172, 2012, pp. 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.217410.1001/archinternmed.2011.2174
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Säynäjoki, E., Heinonen, J., Junnila, S. Role of urban planning in encouraging more sustainable lifestyles. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 141, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.000019610.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000196
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Alexander, Ch. Silverstein, M., Ishikawa, S. The pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977, 1171 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Rudokas, K. and Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I. Total heritage: future Eopolis for cultural urban singularity. Foresight, 2020, Vol. ahead-of-print, Issue ahead-of print doi.org/10.1108/FS-03-2020-003110.1108/FS-03-2020-0031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Wright, F. L. The disappearing city. New York: W. F. Payson, 1932. 90 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Rudokas, K. Urbanistikos ir architektūros paveldo holistinis suvokimas: eschatologinė prieiga [Holistic perception of urban and architectural heritage: eschatological approach]. Logos, Vol. 101, 2019, pp. 147–158. https://doi.org/10.24101/logos.2019.82.10.24101/logos.2019.82
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Stewart, J. E. Evolutionary possibilities: can a society be constrained so that ‘the good’ selforganizes? World Futures, Vol. 74, Issue 1, 2018, pp. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2017.1357985.10.1080/02604027.2017.1357985
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Benke K., Tomkins B. Future food-production systems: vertical farming and controlled-environment agriculture. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, Vol. 13, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2017.139405410.1080/15487733.2017.1394054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Beacham A. M., Vickers L. H., Monaghan, J. M. Vertical farming: a summary of approaches to growing skywards. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, Vol. 94, Issue 3, 2019, pp. 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2019.157421410.1080/14620316.2019.1574214
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Database on Arable Land [online, cited 26.11.2020]. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.ARBL.HA.PC?end¼2013&start¼1961&view¼chart
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Ulrich, R. S. Natural vs. urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects. Environ. Behav., Vol. 13, 1981, pp. 523–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391658113500110.1177/0013916581135001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Ulrich, R. S. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, Vol. 224, 1984, pp. 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.614340210.1126/science.6143402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. McEwan, K., Ferguson, F. J., Richardson, M., Cameron, R. The good things in urban nature: A thematic framework for optimising urban planning for nature connectedness. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 194, 2020, 103687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.10368710.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103687
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Heerwagen, J. Biophilia, health, and well-being. In: Campbell, L., Wiesen, A., (eds.) Restorative commons: creating health and well-being through urban landscapes. Gen. Tech Rep. NRS-P-39, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 2009, pp. 38–57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Gillis, K., Gatersleben, B. A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings, Vol. 5, 2015, pp. 948–963. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings503094810.3390/buildings5030948
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Abdelaal, M.S. Biophilic campus: an emerging planning approach for a sustainable innovation-conducive university. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 215, 2019, pp. 1445–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.18510.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.185
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Colley, K., Craig, T. Natural places: perceptions of wildness and attachment to local greenspace. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 61, 2019, pp. 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.12.00710.1016/j.jenvp.2018.12.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Martin, L., White, M. P., Hunt, A., Richardson, M., Pahl, S., Burt, J. Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 68, 2020, 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.10138910.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Wilson E. O. Biophilia, the human bond with other species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984. 157 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Kellert, S., Calabrese, E. The practice of biophilic design, 2015 [online, cited 02.01.2020]. www.biophilic-design.com
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Sterkenberg, Z. Office futures: the office design trends of 2020, 2019 [online]. Ambius [cited 05.05.2020] https://www.ambius.com/blog/2020-office-design-trends/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Office in a Forest: Is this the Workplace of the Future? [online]. Temasek [cited 05.05.2020]. https://www.temasek.com.sg/en/news-and-views/stories/sustainability/generational-investing/office-in-a-forest-future-work-place
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Greenfield, R. Why your office is beginning to look like a forest, 2018 [online, cited 05.05.2020] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-05/why-your-office-is-beginning-to-look-like-a-forest
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Biswas, A., Paul, I. Faulkner, G. E., Bajaj, R. R., Silver, M. A., Mitchell, M. S., Alter, D. A. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 162, 2015, pp. 123–132. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-165110.7326/M14-1651
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Withagen, R., Caljouw, R. S. ‘The End of Sitting’: An Empirical Study on Working in an Office of the Future. Sports Med, Vol. 46, 2016, pp. 1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0448-y10.1007/s40279-015-0448-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Renaud, L. R., Huysmans, M. A., Speklé, E. M., van der Beek, A. J., van der Ploeg, H. P. ‘The End of Sitting’ in a public space: observations of spontaneous visitors. BMC Public Health, Vol. 17, 2017, 937. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4971-710.1186/s12889-017-4971-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Perino, A., Pereira, H. M., Navarro, L. M., Fernández, N., Bullock, J. M., Ceausu, S., Cortes-Avizanda, A., van Klink, R., Kuemmerle, T., Lomba, A., Pe’er, G., Plienger, T., Rey Benayas, J.M., Sandom, C.J., Svenning, J.-C., Wheeler, H.C. Rewilding complex ecosystems. Science, Vol. 364, 2019, 5570. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav557010.1126/science.aav5570
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Balevičiūtė, A., Veteikis, D. Renatūralizacijos pokyčiai Lietuvos kraštovaizdyje 1995–2010 metais. Geografija, Vol. 48, Issue 2, 2012, pp. 132–144. https://doi.org/10.6001/geografija.v48i2.254310.6001/geografija.v48i2.2543
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Solé, R. V., Montañez, R., Duran-Nebreda, S. Synthetic circuit designs for earth terraformation. Biology Direct, Vol. 10, Issue 1, 2015, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-015-0064-710.1186/s13062-015-0064-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Solé, R. V., Montañez, R., Duran-Nebreda, S., Rodriguez-Amor, D., Vidiella, B., Sardanyés, J. Population dynamics of synthetic terraformation motifs. Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 5, Issue 7, 2018, 180121. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.18012110.1098/rsos.180121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Interfacing with the brain, 2020 [online]. Neuralink [cited 26.11.2020] https://neuralink.com/approach/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Growing up: skyscraper farms seen as a way to produce food locally and cut greenhouse emissions, 2019 [online]. Scientific American [cited 04.11.2019] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/earth-talks-skyscraper-farms/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Despommier, D. The vertical farm: feeding the world in the 21st century. New York: Picador, 2010, 336 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Dudley, N. Authenticity as a Means of Measuring Forest Quality. Biodiversity Letters Vol. 3, Issue 1, 1996, pp. 6–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/299970310.2307/2999703
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Kurashov, V. I. Ecology and eschatology. Russian Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 37, Issue 3, 1998, pp. 8–18. https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-19673703810.2753/RSP1061-196737038
]Search in Google Scholar
