[ABDULLA, Z. B. – SEDEEQ, A. M. – KHORSHID, F. F. 2022. Effects of forward speeds and blade angles of potato digger on fuel consumption and tuber mechanical damages. In Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 21–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2022.133565.1170]Search in Google Scholar
[AL-DOSARY, N. M. N. 2016. Potato harvester performance on tuber damage at the eastern of Saudi Arabia. In Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 32–42. Available at: https://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounral/article/view/3401/2342]Search in Google Scholar
[ALSHARIFI, S. K. A. – ALJIBOURI, M. A. – TAHER, M. A. 2019. Effect of two types of digger machines and speeds of tractor on the qualitative characteristics of potato. In Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 308–322. Available at: https://www.fayoum.edu.eg/Agri/conference3/pdf/Researches/E/22.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[ARAFA, G. K. 2019. Some factors affecting the damage of potato tubers during harvest. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 753–772. Available at: https://mjae.journals.ekb.eg/article_94776_91fe3f945655ccf6cfa778c0e8c25317.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[ARAFA, G. K. 2007. The effect of harvesting operation on potato crop handling. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 492–503. Available at: http://www.mjae.eg.net/pdf/2007/july/3.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[BAIO, F. H. R. – ANTUNIASSI, U. R. – BALASTREIRE, L. A. – CAIXETA FILHO, J. V. 2004. Linear programming model for agricultural boom sprayer selection. In Engenharia Agrícola, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 355–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162004000200014]Search in Google Scholar
[BANGAR, V. T. – JADHAV, S. R. – PATIL, K. D. – BIRADAR, V. U. – OSTWAL, R. S. 2016. Design and development of potato harvester. In International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 3343–3347. Available at: http://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/DESIGN_AND_DEVELOPMENT_OF_POTATO_HARVESTER_ijariie2586.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[BARITELLE, A. – HYDE, G. – THORNTON, R. – BAJEMA, R. 2000. A classification system for impact-related defects in potato tubers. In American Journal of Potato Research, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 143–148. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02853938]Search in Google Scholar
[BENTINI, M. – CAPRARA, C. – MARTELLI, R. 2006. Harvesting damage to potato tubers by analysis of impacts recorded with an instrumented sphere. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 75–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.02.007]Search in Google Scholar
[BERNIK, R. – GODEŠA, T. – DOLNIČAR, P. – VUČAJNK, F. 2010. Potato yield and tuber quality in 75 cm and 90 cm wide ridges. In Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 175–81. Available at: http://aas.bf.uni-lj.si/julij2010/07bernik.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[BOHL, W. H. – JOHNSON, S. B. 2010. Commercial Potato Production in North America: The Potato Association of America Handbook, 2nd ed. New York : Potato Association of America, 85 pp. Available at: https://vric.ucdavis.edu/pdf/POTATOES/Commercial%20Potato%20Production%20in%20North%20America%202010.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[ BULGAKOV, V. – IVANOVS, S. – SAFCHENKO, I. – BORIS, A. – RYCHLIVSKYJ, P. 2019. Theoretical research of the design and technological parameters of a device for lifting of deep-seated table root crops. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 99–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2019-0018]Search in Google Scholar
[CHEHAIBI, S. – HAMDI, W. – ABROUGUI, K. 2013. Effects of planting depth on agronomic performance of two potato varieties grown in the Sahel region of Tunisia. In Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 272–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE12.116]Search in Google Scholar
[DA CUNHA, J. P. A. R. – MARTINS, D. H. – DA CUNHA, W. G. 2011. Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest. In Engenharia Agrícola, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 826–834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162011000400020]Search in Google Scholar
[FAO. 2021. World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2021. Rome : Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 353 pp. ISSN 2225-7373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4477en]Search in Google Scholar
[FRANČÁK, J. – KORENKO, M. – KUBOŃ, M. 2012. Innovative solutions in potato harvesting techniques. In Inżynieria Rolnicza (Agricultural Engineering), vol. 4, no. 140, pp. 19–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[GHALI, A. A. 2019. Effecting digger machine (John Deere type), soil moisture content and tractor speeds on some qualitative characteristics of potato. In Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science, vol. 11, no 2. pp. 22–31. Available at: https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/487e144239e4d6ec]Search in Google Scholar
[ISSA, I. I. M. – ZHANG, Z. – EL-KOLALY, W. – YANG, X. – WANG, H. 2020. Design, ANSYS analysis and performance evaluation of potato digger harvester. In International Agricultural Engineering Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 60–73.]Search in Google Scholar
[KHAN, A. A. – JILANI, M. S. – KHAN, M. Q. – ZUBAIR, M. 2011. Effect of seasonal variation on tuber bulking rate of potato. In The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–37. Available at: http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/21(1)2011/EFFECT-OF-SEASONAL.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[KHANI, M. – PAYMAN, S. H. – PIRMORADIAN, N. 2021. Development of a pilot soil-water balance model for determination of probability of a working day for rice harvesting. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 55–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2021-0009]Search in Google Scholar
[KHEIRY, A. N. O. – ELSSIR, A. – RAHMA, A. E. – MOHAMED, M. A. – OMER, E. A. –DONG, H. J. – LIWEI, Y. 2018. Effect of operation variables of potato digger with double chain conveyors on crop handling and machine performance. In International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 87–101. Available at: https://ijoear.com/assets/articles_menuscripts/file/IJOEAR-APR-2018-6.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[KUMAR, D. – TRIPATHI, A. 2017. Performance evaluation of tractor drawn potato digger cum-elevator. In International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 433–448. Available at: http://www.tjprc.org/publishpapers/2-50-1490605027-55.IJASRAPR201755.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[MORAD, M. M. – ALI, M. M. A. – EL-SHAL, H. M. – EL-GENDY, S. L. A. 2015. Comparative study between some different potato harvesting machine in small holdings. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 479–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2015.98576]Search in Google Scholar
[MULLINS, E. – MILBOURNE, D. – PETTI, C. – DOYLE-PRESTWICH, B. M. – MEADE, C. 2006. Potato in the age of biotechnology. In Trends in Plant Science, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 254–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[NARENDER – RANI, V. – MUKESH, S. – KUMAR, A. – SHARMA, P. 2019. Optimization of performance parameters of root crop digger for potato crop. In Current Agriculture Research Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 276–282. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.7.2.16]Search in Google Scholar
[SABZ DASHT COMPANY. Agricultural machines. Available at: http://www.sabzdasht.ir/sdasht/category/catid/110/lang/en#cat110]Search in Google Scholar
[SEDDIQ, A. M. A. 2012. Effect of methods and timing removal of potato crop vegetative part in the quantitative and qualitative loss with two kinds of lifters. In Journal of Kirkuk University for Agricultural Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 169–186.]Search in Google Scholar
[SÖĞÜT, T. – ÖZTÜRK, F. 2011. Effects of harvesting time on some yield and quality traits of different maturing potato cultivars. In African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 38, pp. 7349–7355.Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/94768]Search in Google Scholar
[STRECK, N. A. – LAGO, I. – ALBERTO, C. M. – BISOGNIN, D. A. 2006. Simulation of potato cultivar Asterix development under five climate change scenarios in Santa Maria. In Bragantia, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 693–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052006000400021]Search in Google Scholar
[TAWFIK, M. A. – ABDELLAH, Y. S. 2012. Fabricating a prototype of potato digger to suit small holdings. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 705–724. Available at: https://mjae.journals.ekb.eg/article_102335.html]Search in Google Scholar
[YOUNUS, A. – JAYAN, P. R. 2015. Performance evaluation of root crop harvesters. In International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 38-52. Available at: http://www.ijerd.com/paper/vol11-issue6/Version_1/F1163852.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[ZHANG, F. – QIU, Z. – MAO, P. – XU, R. – JUN, W. 2011. The model and simulation of the potato harvester. In Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 44–47, pp. 900–904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.44-47.900]Search in Google Scholar