Occlusal sequalae of the loss of first permanent molars among children and adolescents.

1. Saber AM, Altoukhi DH, Horaib MF, et al. Consequences of early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2018;15(1):59.10.1186/s12903-018-0516-4Search in Google Scholar

2. Kim HS, Na HJ, Kim HJ, et al. Evaluation of proximal contact strength by postural changes. J Adv Prosthodont. 2009;1:118-123.10.4047/jap.2009.1.3.118Search in Google Scholar

3. Vardimon AD, Matsaev E, Lieberman M, et al. Tightness of dental contact points in spaced and nonspaced permanent dentitions. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(3):305-314.10.1093/ejo/23.3.305Search in Google Scholar

4. Kim KH, Jung JH, Kim HJ, et al. Evaluation of tightness of proximal tooth contact in permanent dentition. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2008;24(4)371-379.Search in Google Scholar

5. Raducanu AM, Victor F, Claudiu H, et al. Prevalence of loss of permanent first molars in a group of Romanian children and adolescents. OHDMBSC. 2009;8(3):3-11.Search in Google Scholar

6. Gupta DK, Singh SP, Utreja A, Verma S. Prevalence of malocclusion and assessment of treatment needs in β-thalassemia major children. Prog Orthod. 2016;17(1):7.10.1186/s40510-016-0120-6Search in Google Scholar

7. Casanova-Rosado AJ, Medina-Solis CE, Casanova-Rosado JF, et al. Factors associated with the loss of the first permanent molar in school children in Campeche, Mexico. Acta Odontologica Venezolana. 2005;43(3):268-275.Search in Google Scholar

8. Sutcliffe PH. A longitudinal study of caries experience and extraction of permanent first molars in English children. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2008;2(4):182 – 186.10.1111/j.1600-0528.1974.tb01870.xSearch in Google Scholar

9. After PE. Clinical and specific changes of dental arches and occlusal relations after first permanent molar loss, in teenagers and yound adults. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2015;7(4):73-77.Search in Google Scholar

10. Varshney A, Hegde MN, Yelapure M. Prevalence of Missing First Molar in South Canara District Population. International Journal of Medical and Oral Research. 2018;3(1):26-30.Search in Google Scholar

11. Theo TK, Ashley PF, Parekh S, Noar J. The evaluation of spontaneous space closure after the extraction of first permanent molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(4):7–12.10.1007/s40368-013-0042-7Search in Google Scholar

12. Serindere G, Bolgul B, Parlar T, Cosgun A. Effects of first permanent molar extractıon on space changes observed in the dental arch using data mining method. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(7):936-942.10.4103/njcp.njcp_52_19Search in Google Scholar

13. Dimberg L. Malocclusions and Quality of Life. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in children. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2015;237:1–88.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kern J, Wolfart S, Hilgers R, et al. The randomized shortened dental arch study: influence of two different treatments on interdental spacing over 5 years. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21:1945–1951.10.1007/s00784-016-1981-2Search in Google Scholar

15. Miller EL, Bodden WR Jr, Jamison HC. A study of the relationship of the dental midline to the facial median line. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1979;41(6):657-660.10.1016/0022-3913(79)90065-9Search in Google Scholar

16. Yamasaki Y, Kuwatsuru R, Tsukiyama Y, Oki K, Koyano K. Objective assessment of mastication predominance in healthy dentate subjects and patients with unilateral posterior missing teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(8):575-582.10.1111/joor.1240327121170Search in Google Scholar