Correlations between the Harris Hip Score and the Visual Analogue Scale in the assessment of total hip replacement in hip dysplasia

1. Quintana J.M., Arostegui I., Azkarate J., Goenaga J.I., Elexpe X., Letona J. & Arcelay A. (2000). Evaluation of explicit criteria for total hip joint replacement. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 53(12), 1200-1208.10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00244-4Search in Google Scholar

2. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL). (1998). Development and general psychometric properties. Social science & medicine. 46(12), 1569-1585.10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4Search in Google Scholar

3. Ahmad M.A., Xypnitos F.N. & Giannoudis P.V. (2011). Measuring hip outcomes: common scales and checklists. Injury. 42(3), 259-264.10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.052Search in Google Scholar

4. Xu M., Garbuz D.S., Kuramoto L. & Sobolev B. (2005). Classifying health-related quality of life outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 6, 48.10.1186/1471-2474-6-48Search in Google Scholar

5. Chapman C.R., Casey K.L., Dubner R., Foley K.M., Gracely R.H. & Reading A.E. (1985). Pain measurement: an overview. Pain. 22(1), 1-31.10.1016/0304-3959(85)90145-9Search in Google Scholar

6. Knahr K., Kryspin-Exner I., Jagsch R., Freilinger W., Kasparek M. (1998). Evaluating the quality of life before and after implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete. 136(4), 321-329.10.1055/s-2008-10537459795434Search in Google Scholar

7. Lingard E., Hashimoto H. & Sledge C. (2000). Development of outcome research for total joint arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedic science: official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 5(2), 175-177.10.1007/s00776005014610982653Search in Google Scholar

8. Amadio P.C. (1993). Outcomes measurements. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 75(11), 1583-1584.10.2106/00004623-199311000-000018245049Search in Google Scholar

9. Lieberman J.R., Dorey F., Shekelle P., Schumacher L., Thomas B.J., Kilgus D.J. & Finerman G.A. (1996). Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 78(6), 835-838.10.2106/00004623-199606000-000058666600Search in Google Scholar

10. Wright J.G. & Young N.L. (1997). The patientspecific index: asking patients what they want. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 79(7), 974-983.10.2106/00004623-199707000-000039234873Search in Google Scholar

11. Harris W.H. (1969). Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 51(4), 737-755.10.2106/00004623-196951040-00012Search in Google Scholar

12. Fergusson A. & Howarth M. (1931). Slipping of the upper femoral epiphysis. JAMA. (97), 1867-1872.10.1001/jama.1931.02730250025009Search in Google Scholar

13. D'Aubigne R.M. & Postel M. (1954). Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 36-A(3), 451-475.10.2106/00004623-195436030-00001Search in Google Scholar

14. Charnley J. (1972). The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 54(1), 61-76.10.1302/0301-620X.54B1.61Search in Google Scholar

15. Andersson G. (1972). Hip assessment: a comparison of nine different methods. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 54(4), 621-625.10.1302/0301-620X.54B4.621Search in Google Scholar

16. Shields R.K., Enloe L.J., Evans R.E., Smith K.B. & Steckel S.D. (1995). Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of functional tests in patients with total joint replacement. Physical therapy. 75(3), 169-176; discussion 176-169.10.1093/ptj/75.3.169Search in Google Scholar

17. Kosinski M., Keller S.D., Ware J.E., Jr., Hatoum H.T. & Kong S.X. (1999). The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative validity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severity. Medical care. 37(5 Suppl), MS23-39.10.1097/00005650-199905001-00003Search in Google Scholar

18. Wright J.G. & Young N.L. (1997). A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 50(3), 239-246.10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00373-3Search in Google Scholar

19. Angst F., Aeschlimann A., Steiner W. & Stucki G. (2001). Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 60(9), 834-840.Search in Google Scholar

20. Bachmeier C.J., March L.M., Cross M.J., Lapsley H.M., Tribe K.L., Courtenay B.G. & Brooks P.M. (2001). Arthritis Cost and Outcome Project Group. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis and cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society. 9(2), 137-146.10.1053/joca.2000.0369Search in Google Scholar

21. Anderson J.J., Firschein H.E. & Meenan R.F. (1989). Sensitivity of a health status measure to short-term clinical changes in arthritis. Arthritis and rheumatism. 32(7), 844-850.Search in Google Scholar

22. Davies G.M., Watson D.J. & Bellamy N. (1999). Comparison of the responsiveness and relative effect size of the western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the short-form Medical Outcomes Study Survey in a randomized, clinical trial of osteoarthritis patients. Arthritis care and research: the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association. 12(3), 172-179.10.1002/1529-0131(199906)12:3<172::AID-ART4>3.0.CO;2-YSearch in Google Scholar

23. Norman G.R., Stratford P. & Regehr G. (1997). Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 50(8), 869-879.10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00097-8Search in Google Scholar

24. Hoeksma H.L., Van Den Ende C.H., Ronday H.K., Heering A. & Breedveld F.C. (2003). Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 62(10), 935-938. 10.1136/ard.62.10.935Search in Google Scholar

25. Guyatt G.H., Townsend M., Berman L.B. & Keller J.L. (1987). A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. Journal of chronic diseases. 40(12), 1129-1133.10.1016/0021-9681(87)90080-4Search in Google Scholar

26. Haverkamp D., Sierevelt I.N., van den Bekerom M.P., Poolman R.W., van Dijk C.N. & Marti R.K. (2008). The validity of patient satisfaction as single question in outcome measurement of total hip arthroplasty. Journal of long-term effects of medical implants. 18(2), 145-150.10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v18.i2.30Search in Google Scholar

27. Brokelman R.B., van Loon C.J. & Rijnberg W.J. (2003). Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 85(4), 495-498.10.1302/0301-620X.85B4.13411Search in Google Scholar

28. Brokelman R.B., Haverkamp D., van Loon C., Hol A., van Kampen A. & Veth R. (2012). The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. European orthopaedics and traumatology. 3(2), 101-105.10.1007/s12570-012-0100-3Search in Google Scholar

29. de Nies F. & Fidler M.W. (1997). Visual analog scale for the assessment of total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty. 12(4), 416-419. 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90197-2Search in Google Scholar