[
1. Dax, T., & Oedl-Wieser, T. (2016). Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union. Studies in Agricultural Economics. 118. 30-37. 10.7896/j.1535;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Bumbalová, M., Takáč, I., Tvrdoňová, J., & Valach, M. (2016). “Are Stakeholders in Slovakia Ready for Community-Led Local Development? Case Study Findings” European Countryside, vol.8, no.2, pp.160-174., 10.1515/euco-2016-0013;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Masot N. A. & Cárdenas Alonso G. (2017). 25 Years of the Leader Initiative as European Rural Development Policy: The Case of Extremadura (SW Spain), European Countryside, 9(2), 302-316. 10.1515/euco-2017-0019;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Cárdenas Alonso G. & Masot N. (2020). A. Rural space governance in Extremadura (SW Spain). Analysis of the Leader Approach. European Countryside, 12. 448-468. 10.2478/euco-2020-0024;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Yagiue, J.L., de Nicolas, V.L. & Martinez, J.L. (2013). Leader Rural Development Program in Spain: Profile and Functions of Workers in Local Action Groups.. In: “The Sixth International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2013. Innovations and Sustainaibility”, Akademija. Lithuania;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Volk, A. & Bojnec, S. (2014). Local action groups and the LEADER co-financing of rural development projects in Slovenia. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic). 60. 364-375. 10.17221/180/2013-AGRICECON.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Arroyo, F.M., López, H.S. & Blanco, José. (2015). Are local action groups, under LEADER approach, a good way to support resilience in rural areas?. Ager. 39-63. 10.4422/ager.2015.06.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Zajda, K. (2014). Problems of functioning of Polish local action groups from the perspective of the social capital concept. Eastern European Countryside. 20. 10.2478/eec-2014-0004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Olar A. & Jitea I.M. (2020). Assessing the quality of the local development strategies in Romania, evidence from 2014-2020 programming period. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 20(2): 347 – 358;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Pérez-Fra, M., Lopez I.E., Arias, A.I., Sineiro G. F. & Lorenzana, R. (2012). Representativeness and civic participation in rural development programmes The case of the PRODER programme in Galicia, Spain. Outlook on agriculture. 410098. 215-220. 10.5367/oa.2012.0098.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Navarro, F., Cejudo, E. & Maroto, J. (2016). Participation of disadvantaged groups and governance in the LEADER and PRODER programmes in Andalucía, Spain. Studies in Agricultural Economics. 118. 47-54. 10.7896/j.1532.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Joshi A., Saket K., Satish C. & Dinesh P. (2015) Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7. 396-403. 10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Ballesteros J. G. T. & Hernández M. H. (2018). Promoting tourism through the EU LEADER programme: understanding Local Action Group governance, European Planning Studies, 27, 396-414, 10.1080/09654313.2018.1547368;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Esparcia, J., Escribano, J. & Serrano, J. (2015). From development to power relations and territorial governance: Increasing the leadership role of LEADER Local Action Groups in Spain. Journal of Rural Studies. 42. 29-42. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.005.
]Search in Google Scholar
