This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Khanagar SB, Al-Ehaideb A, Vishwanathaiah S, Maganur PC, Patil S, Naik S, et al. Scope and performance of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision-making—a systematic review. J Dent Sci 2021;16(1):482–92.KhanagarSBAl-EhaidebAVishwanathaiahSMaganurPCPatilSNaikSScope and performance of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision-making—a systematic review. J Dent Sci2021;16(1):482–92.Search in Google Scholar
Morita PP, Abhari S, Kaur J, M Miranda PASS, Oetomo A Applying ChatGPT in public health: a SWOT and PESTLE analysis. Front Public Health 2023;11:1225861.MoritaPPAbhariSKaurJM MirandaPASSOetomoAApplying ChatGPT in public health: a SWOT and PESTLE analysis. Front Public Health2023;11:1225861.Search in Google Scholar
Maltarollo TFH, Strazzi-Sahyon HB, Amaral RR, Araujo GS. Is the field of endodontics prepared to utilise ChatGPT? Aust Endod J 2023;50(1):176–7.MaltarolloTFHStrazzi-SahyonHBAmaralRRAraujoGS.Is the field of endodontics prepared to utilise ChatGPT?Aust Endod J2023;50(1):176–7.Search in Google Scholar
Maltarollo TFH, Shitsuka C, Araújo GS. ChatGPT and its use in paediatric dentistry. Eur Arch Paediatric Dentistry 2023;24(5):675–6.MaltarolloTFHShitsukaCAraújoGS.ChatGPT and its use in paediatric dentistry. Eur Arch Paediatric Dentistry2023;24(5):675–6.Search in Google Scholar
Alhaidry HM, Fatani B, Alrayes JO, Almana AM, Alfhaed NK. ChatGPT in dentistry: a comprehensive review. Cureus 2023; 15(4):1–8.AlhaidryHMFataniBAlrayesJOAlmanaAMAlfhaedNK.ChatGPT in dentistry: a comprehensive review. Cureus2023; 15(4):1–8.Search in Google Scholar
Mario MC, Abe JM, Ortega NRS, Del Santo M Jr. Paraconsistent artificial neural network as auxiliary in cephalometric diagnosis. Artif Organs 2010;34(7):E215–21.MarioMCAbeJMOrtegaNRSDel SantoMJr.Paraconsistent artificial neural network as auxiliary in cephalometric diagnosis. Artif Organs2010;34(7):E215–21.Search in Google Scholar
Ma Q, Kobayashi E, Fan B, Nakagawa K, Sakuma I, Masamune K, et al. Automatic 3D landmarking model using patch-based deep neural networks for CT image of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assisted Surg 2020;16(3):e2093.MaQKobayashiEFanBNakagawaKSakumaIMasamuneKAutomatic 3D landmarking model using patch-based deep neural networks for CT image of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assisted Surg2020;16(3):e2093.Search in Google Scholar
Muraev AA, Tsai P, Kibardin I, Oborotistov N, Shirayeva T, Ivanov S, et al. Frontal cephalometric landmarking: humans vs artificial neural networks. Int J Comput Dent 2020;23(2):139–48.MuraevAATsaiPKibardinIOborotistovNShirayevaTIvanovSFrontal cephalometric landmarking: humans vs artificial neural networks. Int J Comput Dent2020;23(2):139–48.Search in Google Scholar
Suhail Y, Upadhyay M, Chhibber A, Kshitiz. Machine learning for the diagnosis of orthodontic extractions: a computational analysis using ensemble learning. Bioengineering (Basel) 2020;7(2):1–13.SuhailYUpadhyayMChhibberAKshitiz. Machine learning for the diagnosis of orthodontic extractions: a computational analysis using ensemble learning. Bioengineering (Basel)2020;7(2):1–13.Search in Google Scholar
Chen S, Wang L, Li G, Wu TH, Diachina S, Tejera B, et al. Machine learning in orthodontics: introducing a 3D auto-segmentation and auto-landmark finder of CBCT images to assess maxillary constriction in unilateral impacted canine patients. Angle Orthod 2020;90(1):77–84.ChenSWangLLiGWuTHDiachinaSTejeraBMachine learning in orthodontics: introducing a 3D auto-segmentation and auto-landmark finder of CBCT images to assess maxillary constriction in unilateral impacted canine patients. Angle Orthod2020;90(1):77–84.Search in Google Scholar
Laurenziello M, Montaruli G, Gallo C, Tepedino M, Guida L, Perillo L, et al. Determinants of maxillary canine impaction: retrospective clinical and radiographic study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(11):e1304–9.LaurenzielloMMontaruliGGalloCTepedinoMGuidaLPerilloLDeterminants of maxillary canine impaction: retrospective clinical and radiographic study. J Clin Exp Dent2017;9(11):e1304–9.Search in Google Scholar
Thanathornwong B. Bayesian-based decision support system for assessing the needs for orthodontic treatment. Healthc Inform Res 2018;24(1):22–8.ThanathornwongB.Bayesian-based decision support system for assessing the needs for orthodontic treatment. Healthc Inform Res2018;24(1):22–8.Search in Google Scholar
Wang X, Cai B, Cao Y, Zhou C, Yang L, Liu R, et al. Objective method for evaluating orthodontic treatment from the lay perspective: an eye-tracking study. Am. J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2016;150(4):601–10.WangXCaiBCaoYZhouCYangLLiuRObjective method for evaluating orthodontic treatment from the lay perspective: an eye-tracking study. Am. J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2016;150(4):601–10.Search in Google Scholar
Kim B-M, Kang B-Y, Kim H-G, Baek S-H. Prognosis prediction for class III malocclusion treatment by feature wrapping method. Angle Orthod 2009;79(4):683–91; doi: 10.2319/071508-371.1.KimB-MKangB-YKimH-GBaekS-H.Prognosis prediction for class III malocclusion treatment by feature wrapping method. Angle Orthod2009;79(4):683–91; doi: 10.2319/071508-371.1.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Akcam MO. Fuzzy modelling for selecting headgear types. Eur J Orthod 2002;24(1):99–106; doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.1.99.AkcamMO.Fuzzy modelling for selecting headgear types. Eur J Orthod2002;24(1):99–106; doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.1.99.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lux CJ, Stellzig A, Volz D, Jäger W, Richardson A, Komposch G. A neural network approach to the analysis and classification of human craniofacial growth. Growth Dev Aging 1998;62(3):95–106.LuxCJStellzigAVolzDJägerWRichardsonAKomposchG.A neural network approach to the analysis and classification of human craniofacial growth. Growth Dev Aging1998;62(3):95–106.Search in Google Scholar
Bichu YM, Hansa I, Bichu AY, Premjani P, Flores-Mir C, Vaid NR. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review. Prog Orthod 2021;22(1):1–8.BichuYMHansaIBichuAYPremjaniPFlores-MirCVaidNR.Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review. Prog Orthod2021;22(1):1–8.Search in Google Scholar
Spampinato C, Palazzo S, Giordano D, Aldinucci M, Leonardi R. Deep learning for automated skeletal bone age assessment in X-ray images. Med Image Anal 2017;36:41–51.SpampinatoCPalazzoSGiordanoDAldinucciMLeonardiR.Deep learning for automated skeletal bone age assessment in X-ray images. Med Image Anal2017;36:41–51.Search in Google Scholar
Babayiğit O, Tastan Eroglu Z, Ozkan Sen D, Ucan Yarkac F. Potential Use of ChatGPT for patient information in periodontology: a descriptive pilot study. Cureus 2023;15(11):1–30.BabayiğitOTastan ErogluZOzkan SenDUcan YarkacF.Potential Use of ChatGPT for patient information in periodontology: a descriptive pilot study. Cureus2023;15(11):1–30.Search in Google Scholar
Balel Y. Can ChatGPT be used in oral and maxillofacial surgery? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023;124(5):1–4.BalelY.Can ChatGPT be used in oral and maxillofacial surgery?J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg2023;124(5):1–4.Search in Google Scholar
Tiwari A, Kumar A, Jain S, Dhull KS, Sajjanar A, Puthenkandathil R, et al. Implications of ChatGPT in public health dentistry: a systematic review. Cureus 2023;15(6):1–10.TiwariAKumarAJainSDhullKSSajjanarAPuthenkandathilRImplications of ChatGPT in public health dentistry: a systematic review. Cureus2023;15(6):1–10.Search in Google Scholar
Abu Arqub S, Al-Moghrabi D, Allareddy V, Upadhyay M, Vaid N, Yadav S. Content analysis of AI-generated (ChatGPT) responses concerning orthodontic clear aligners. Angle Orthod 2024;94(3):263–72.Abu ArqubSAl-MoghrabiDAllareddyVUpadhyayMVaidNYadavS.Content analysis of AI-generated (ChatGPT) responses concerning orthodontic clear aligners. Angle Orthod2024;94(3):263–72.Search in Google Scholar
Tanaka OM, Gasparello GG, Hartmann GC, Casagrande FA, Pithon MM. Assessing the reliability of ChatGPT: a content analysis of self-generated and self-answered questions on clear aligners, TADs and digital imaging. Dental Press J Orthod 2023;28(5):1–22.TanakaOMGasparelloGGHartmannGCCasagrandeFAPithonMM.Assessing the reliability of ChatGPT: a content analysis of self-generated and self-answered questions on clear aligners, TADs and digital imaging. Dental Press J Orthod2023;28(5):1–22.Search in Google Scholar
Hatia A, Doldo T, Parrini S, Chisci E, Cipriani L, Montagna L, et al. Accuracy and Completeness of ChatGPT-generated information on interceptive orthodontics: a multicenter collaborative study. J Clin Med 2024;13(3):1–21.HatiaADoldoTParriniSChisciECiprianiLMontagnaLAccuracy and Completeness of ChatGPT-generated information on interceptive orthodontics: a multicenter collaborative study. J Clin Med2024;13(3):1–21.Search in Google Scholar
Demir GB, Süküt Y, Duran GS, Topsakal KG, Görgülü S. Enhancing systematic reviews in orthodontics: a comparative examination of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for generating PICO-based queries with tailored prompts and configurations. Eur J Orthod 2024;46(2):1–12.DemirGBSükütYDuranGSTopsakalKGGörgülüS.Enhancing systematic reviews in orthodontics: a comparative examination of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for generating PICO-based queries with tailored prompts and configurations. Eur J Orthod2024;46(2):1–12.Search in Google Scholar
Kilinç DD, Mansiz D. Examination of the reliability and readability of Chatbot generative pretrained transformer’s (ChatGPT) responses to questions about orthodontics and the evolution of these responses in an updated version. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2024;165(5):546–55.KilinçDDMansizD.Examination of the reliability and readability of Chatbot generative pretrained transformer’s (ChatGPT) responses to questions about orthodontics and the evolution of these responses in an updated version. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2024;165(5):546–55.Search in Google Scholar
Daraqel B, Wafaie K, Mohammed H, Cao L, Mheissen S, Liu Y, et al. The performance of artificial intelligence models in generating responses to general orthodontic questions: ChatGPT vs Google Bard. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2024;165(6):652–62.DaraqelBWafaieKMohammedHCaoLMheissenSLiuYThe performance of artificial intelligence models in generating responses to general orthodontic questions: ChatGPT vs Google Bard. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2024;165(6):652–62.Search in Google Scholar
Huang H, Zheng O, Wang D, Yin J, Wang Z, Ding S, et al. ChatGPT for shaping the future of dentistry: the potential of multi-modal large language model. Int J Oral Sci 2023 15:1 2023;15(1):1–13.HuangHZhengOWangDYinJWangZDingSChatGPT for shaping the future of dentistry: the potential of multi-modal large language model. Int J Oral Sci 2023 15:12023;15(1):1–13.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson D, Goodman R, Patrinely J, Stone C, Zimmerman E, Donald R, et al. Assessing the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated medical responses: an evaluation of the Chat-GPT Model. Res Sq 2023;1:1–17.JohnsonDGoodmanRPatrinelyJStoneCZimmermanEDonaldRAssessing the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated medical responses: an evaluation of the Chat-GPT Model. Res Sq2023;1:1–17.Search in Google Scholar
