A patient with bimaxillary protrusion was treated by the extraction of four premolars and four compromised first molars: a case report
, , , oraz
01 mar 2024
O artykule
Data publikacji: 01 mar 2024
Zakres stron: 37 - 49
Otrzymano: 01 wrz 2023
Przyjęty: 01 gru 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2024-0001
Słowa kluczowe
© 2024 Jiajun Deng et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Cephalometric analysis
Chinese norm | Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | |
---|---|---|---|
SNA (°) | 82.8 ± 4.0 | 80.6 | 80.1 |
SNB (°) | 80.1 ± 3.9 | 77.2 | 77.6 |
ANB (°) | 2.7 ± 2.0 | 3.4 | 2.5 |
NA-PA (°) | 6.0 ± 4.4 | 7.5 | 4.7 |
FMA (°) | 31.3 ± 5.0 | 31.7 | 31.9 |
SN-MP (°) | 31.1 ± 5.6 | 37.8 | 38.3 |
U1-SN (°) | 105.7 ± 6.3 | 118.7 | 107.4 |
U1-NA (mm) | 5.1 ± 2.4 | 11.2 | 3.0 |
L1-MP (°) | 92.6 ± 7.0 | 91.4 | 85.5 |
L1-NB (mm) | 6.7 ± 2.1 | 10.5 | 4.0 |
Interincisal angle (°) | 125.4 ± 7.9 | 111.7 | 127.5 |
Y-axis angle (°) | 65.8 ± 4.2 | 68.6 | 64.3 |
Overbite (mm) | 0-3.0 | 3.6 | 0.8 |
Overjet (mm) | 0-3.0 | 6.0 | 1.9 |
Upper lip to E-line (mm) | -1.0 ± 2.0 | 4.0 | -1.4 |
Lower lip to E-line (mm) | 0.0 ± 2.0 | 7.8 | -0.2 |