This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Mohamed RN, Basha S, Al-Thomali Y. Maxillary molar distalisation with miniscrew-supported appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2018;88:494–502.MohamedRNBashaSAl-ThomaliY.Maxillary molar distalisation with miniscrew-supported appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review.2018;88:494–502.10.2319/091717-624.1819193929664335Search in Google Scholar
Ali D, Mohammed H, Koo SH, Kang KH, Kim SC. Three-dimensional evaluation of tooth movement in Class II malocclusions treated without extraction by orthodontic mini-implant anchorage. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:280–9.AliDMohammedHKooSHKangKHKimSC.Three-dimensional evaluation of tooth movement in Class II malocclusions treated without extraction by orthodontic mini-implant anchorage.2016;46:280–9.10.4041/kjod.2016.46.5.280503376727668191Search in Google Scholar
Flores-Mir C, McGrath L, Heo G, Major PW. Efficiency of molar distalisation associated with second and third molar eruption stage. Angle Orthod 2013;83:735–42.Flores-MirCMcGrathLHeoGMajorPW.Efficiency of molar distalisation associated with second and third molar eruption stage.2013;83:735–42.10.2319/081612-658.1875403023167519Search in Google Scholar
Bellini-Pereira SA, Pupulim DC, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Henriques JFC, Janson G. Time of maxillary molar distalisation with non-compliance intraoral distalizing appliances: a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2019;41:652–60.Bellini-PereiraSAPupulimDCAliaga-Del CastilloAHenriquesJFCJansonG.Time of maxillary molar distalisation with non-compliance intraoral distalizing appliances: a meta-analysis.2019;41:652–60.10.1093/ejo/cjz03031107942Search in Google Scholar
Bussick TJ, McNamara JA Jr. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:333–43.BussickTJMcNamaraJAJr.Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.2000;117:333–43.10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70238-1Search in Google Scholar
Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalisation technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:639–46.GhoshJNandaRS.Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalisation technique.1996;110:639–46.10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80041-2Search in Google Scholar
Gelgör IE, Büyükyilmaz T, Karaman AI, Dolanmaz D, Kalayci A. Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalisation. Angle Orthod 2004;74:838–50.GelgörIEBüyükyilmazTKaramanAIDolanmazDKalayciA.Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalisation.2004;74:838–50.Search in Google Scholar
Flores-Mir C, McGrath LM, Heo G, Major PW. Efficiency of molar distalisation with the XBow appliance related to second molar eruption stage. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:745–51.Flores-MirCMcGrathLMHeoGMajorPW.Efficiency of molar distalisation with the XBow appliance related to second molar eruption stage.2013;35:745–51.10.1093/ejo/cjs09023172578Search in Google Scholar
Bechtold TE, Park YC, Kim KH, Jung H, Kang JY, Choi YJ. Long-term stability of miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalisation in Class II treatment. Angle Orthod 2020;90:362–8.BechtoldTEParkYCKimKHJungHKangJYChoiYJ.Long-term stability of miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalisation in Class II treatment.2020;90:362–8.10.2319/051619-335.1803230333378427Search in Google Scholar
Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:706–14.HilgersJJ.The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy.1992;26:706–14.Search in Google Scholar
Bolla E, Muratore F, Carano A, Bowman SJ. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalisation with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods. Angle Orthod 2002;72:481–94.BollaEMuratoreFCaranoABowmanSJ.Evaluation of maxillary molar distalisation with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.2002;72:481–94.Search in Google Scholar
Kinzinger GS, Eren M, Diedrich PR. Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalisation: a literature review. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:558–71.KinzingerGSErenMDiedrichPR.Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalisation: a literature review.2008;30:558–71.10.1093/ejo/cjn04718820306Search in Google Scholar
Keles A, Sayinsu K. A new approach in maxillary molar distalisation: intraoral bodily molar distalizer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:39–48.KelesASayinsuK.A new approach in maxillary molar distalisation: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.2000;117:39–48.10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70246-0Search in Google Scholar
Han S, Bayome M, Lee J, Lee YJ, Song HH, Kook YA. Evaluation of palatal bone density in adults and adolescents for application of skeletal anchorage devices. Angle Orthod 2012;82:625–31.HanSBayomeMLeeJLeeYJSongHHKookYA.Evaluation of palatal bone density in adults and adolescents for application of skeletal anchorage devices.2012;82:625–31.10.2319/071311-445.1884555922077190Search in Google Scholar
Choi YJ, Lee JS, Cha JY, Park YC. Total distalisation of the maxillary arch in a patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:823–33.ChoiYJLeeJSChaJYParkYC.Total distalisation of the maxillary arch in a patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion.2011;139:823–33.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.02621640890Search in Google Scholar
Yoon JH, Cha JY, Choi YJ, Park WS, Han SS, Lee KJ. Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalisation depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type. PLoS One 2020;15:e0239759.YoonJHChaJYChoiYJParkWSHanSSLeeKJ.Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalisation depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type.2020;15:e0239759.10.1371/journal.pone.0239759751404632970759Search in Google Scholar
Sugawara J, Kanzaki R, Takahashi I, Nagasaka H, Nanda R. Distal movement of maxillary molars in nongrowing patients with the skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:723–33.SugawaraJKanzakiRTakahashiINagasakaHNandaR.Distal movement of maxillary molars in nongrowing patients with the skeletal anchorage system.2006;129:723–33.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.03616769490Search in Google Scholar
Kang S, Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Heo MS, Kim TW. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(4 Suppl):S74–S81.KangSLeeSJAhnSJHeoMSKimTW.Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults.2007;131(4 Suppl):S74–S81.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.02917448390Search in Google Scholar
Chung KR, Choo H, Kim SH, Ngan P. Timely relocation of mini-implants for uninterrupted full-arch distalisation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:839–49.ChungKRChooHKimSHNganP.Timely relocation of mini-implants for uninterrupted full-arch distalisation.2010;138:839–49.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.03521130344Search in Google Scholar
Kim HJ, Yun HS, Park HD, Kim DH, Park YC. Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:177–82.KimHJYunHSParkHDKimDHParkYC.Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites.2006;130:177–82.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.02416905061Search in Google Scholar
Yamada K, Kuroda S, Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yamashiro T. Distal movement of maxillary molars using miniscrew anchorage in the buccal interradicular region. Angle Orthod 2009;79:78–84.YamadaKKurodaSDeguchiTTakano-YamamotoTYamashiroT.Distal movement of maxillary molars using miniscrew anchorage in the buccal interradicular region.2009;79:78–84.10.2319/020408-68.119123698Search in Google Scholar
Cambiano AO, Janson G, Fuziy A, Garib DG, Lorenzoni DC. Changes consequent to maxillary molar distalisation with the bone-anchored pendulum appliance. J Orthod Sci 2017;6:141–6.CambianoAOJansonGFuziyAGaribDGLorenzoniDC.Changes consequent to maxillary molar distalisation with the bone-anchored pendulum appliance.2017;6:141–6.10.4103/jos.JOS_66_17565596429119095Search in Google Scholar
Cassetta M, Brandetti G, Altieri F. Miniscrew-supported distal jet versus conventional distal jet appliance: A pilot study. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11:e650–e8.CassettaMBrandettiGAltieriF.Miniscrew-supported distal jet versus conventional distal jet appliance: A pilot study.2019;11:e650–e8.10.4317/jced.55780673099931516664Search in Google Scholar
Park CO, Sa’aed NL, Bayome M, Park JH, Kook Y-A, Park Y-S, et al. Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalisation in adults. Korean J Orthod 2017;47:375–83.ParkCOSa’aedNLBayomeMParkJHKookY-AParkY-Set al.Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalisation in adults.2017;47:375–83.10.4041/kjod.2017.47.6.375565368629090125Search in Google Scholar
Fudalej P, Antoszewska J. Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary skeletal anchorage devices effective? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:722–9.FudalejPAntoszewskaJ.Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary skeletal anchorage devices effective?2011;139:722–9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.01.01921640877Search in Google Scholar
Duran GS, Görgülü S, Dindaroğlu F. Three-dimensional analysis of tooth movements after palatal miniscrew-supported molar distalisation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:188–97.DuranGSGörgülüSDindaroğluF.Three-dimensional analysis of tooth movements after palatal miniscrew-supported molar distalisation.2016;150:188–97.10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.02427364220Search in Google Scholar
Jo SY, Bayome M, Park J, Lim HJ, Kook YA, Han SH. Comparison of treatment effects between four premolar extraction and total arch distalisation using the modified C-palatal plate. Korean J Orthod 2018;48:224–35.JoSYBayomeMParkJLimHJKookYAHanSH.Comparison of treatment effects between four premolar extraction and total arch distalisation using the modified C-palatal plate.2018;48:224–35.10.4041/kjod.2018.48.4.224604145430003056Search in Google Scholar
Kaya B, Sar C, Arman-Özçirpici A, Polat-Özsoy O. Palatal implant versus zygoma plate anchorage for distalisation of maxillary posterior teeth. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:507–14.KayaBSarCArman-ÖzçirpiciAPolat-ÖzsoyO.Palatal implant versus zygoma plate anchorage for distalisation of maxillary posterior teeth.2013;35:507–14.10.1093/ejo/cjs05922968670Search in Google Scholar
Kook YA, Kim SH, Chung KR. A modified palatal anchorage plate for simple and efficient distalisation. J Clin Orthod 2010;44:719–30;quiz 43.KookYAKimSHChungKR.A modified palatal anchorage plate for simple and efficient distalisation.2010;44:719–30;quiz 43.Search in Google Scholar
Lee SK, Abbas NH, Bayome M, Baik UB, Kook YA, Hong M, et al. A comparison of treatment effects of total arch distalisation using modified C-palatal plate vs buccal miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2018;88:45–51.LeeSKAbbasNHBayomeMBaikUBKookYAHongMet al.A comparison of treatment effects of total arch distalisation using modified C-palatal plate vs buccal miniscrews.2018;88:45–51.10.2319/061917-406.1831570628985107Search in Google Scholar
Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Pauls A, Yamaguchi S, Ludwig B, Drescher D. Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalisation depending on age and second-molar eruption. J Orofac Orthop 2014;75:118–32.NienkemperMWilmesBPaulsAYamaguchiSLudwigBDrescherD.Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalisation depending on age and second-molar eruption.2014;75:118–32.10.1007/s00056-013-0199-z24577015Search in Google Scholar
Kırcalı M, Yüksel AS. Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalisation. Turk J Orthod 2018;31:103–9.KırcalıMYükselAS.Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalisation.2018;31:103–9.10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18004634049030701219Search in Google Scholar
Suzuki EY, Suzuki B. Maxillary molar distalisation with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalisation Appliance (iPANDA). Orthodontics (Chic) 2013;14:e228–e241.SuzukiEYSuzukiB.Maxillary molar distalisation with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalisation Appliance (iPANDA).2013;14:e228–e241.10.11607/ortho.98223646335Search in Google Scholar
Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:373–8.MiyawakiSKoyamaIInoueMMishimaKSugaharaTTakano-YamamotoT.Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage.2003;124:373–8.10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00565-114560266Search in Google Scholar
Wiechmann D, Meyer U, Büchter A. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:263–7.WiechmannDMeyerUBüchterA.Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study.2007;18:263–7.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01325.x17348892Search in Google Scholar
Gelgor IE, Karaman AI, Buyukyilmaz T. Comparison of 2 distalisation systems supported by intraosseous screws. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:161; e1-8.GelgorIEKaramanAIBuyukyilmazT.Comparison of 2 distalisation systems supported by intraosseous screws.2007;131:161; e1-8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.02717276855Search in Google Scholar
Keles A. Unilateral distalisation of a maxillary molar with sliding mechanics: a case report. J Orthod 2002;29:97–100.KelesA.Unilateral distalisation of a maxillary molar with sliding mechanics: a case report.2002;29:97–100.10.1093/ortho/29.2.9712114457Search in Google Scholar
Song B-J, Lee K-J, Cha J-Y, Lee J-S, Mo S-S, Yu H-S. Stability of the maxillary and mandibular total arch distalisation using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in adults. Appl Sci 2022;12:2898.SongB-JLeeK-JChaJ-YLeeJ-SMoS-SYuH-SStability of the maxillary and mandibular total arch distalisation using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in adults.2022;12:2898.10.3390/app12062898Search in Google Scholar
Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:108–13.CrismaniAGBertlMHCelarAGBantleonHPBurstoneCJ.Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials.2010;137:108–13.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.02720122438Search in Google Scholar
Kircelli BH, Pektaş ZO, Kircelli C. Maxillary molar distalisation with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod 2006;76:650–9.KircelliBHPektaşZOKircelliC.Maxillary molar distalisation with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.2006;76:650–9.Search in Google Scholar
Ludwig B, Glasl B, Kinzinger GS, Walde KC, Lisson JA. The skeletal frog appliance for maxillary molar distalisation. J Clin Orthod 2011;45:77–84; quiz 91.LudwigBGlaslBKinzingerGSWaldeKCLissonJA.The skeletal frog appliance for maxillary molar distalisation.2011;45:77–84; quiz 91.Search in Google Scholar
Yu IJ, Kook YA, Sung SJ, Lee KJ, Chun YS, Mo SS. Comparison of tooth displacement between buccal mini-implants and palatal plate anchorage for molar distalisation: a finite element study. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:394–402.YuIJKookYASungSJLeeKJChunYSMoSS.Comparison of tooth displacement between buccal mini-implants and palatal plate anchorage for molar distalisation: a finite element study.2014;36:394–402.10.1093/ejo/cjr13022051536Search in Google Scholar
Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:229–38.ReddyMSMayfield-DonahooTVandervenFJJeffcoatMK.A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.1994;5:229–38.10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050406.x7640337Search in Google Scholar
Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazäo DC, McNamara JA Jr., Manzi FR. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod 2011;81:26–35.GribelBFGribelMNFrazäoDCMcNamaraJAJr.ManziFR.Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans.2011;81:26–35.10.2319/032210-166.1892636620936951Search in Google Scholar
Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Maxillary molar distalisation with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2008;78:1133–40.AntonarakisGSKiliaridisS.Maxillary molar distalisation with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion. A systematic review.2008;78:1133–40.10.2319/101507-406.118947282Search in Google Scholar
Polat-Ozsoy O, Kircelli BH, Arman-Ozçirpici A, Pektaş ZO, Uçkan S. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:339.e9–e17.Polat-OzsoyOKircelliBHArman-OzçirpiciAPektaşZOUçkanS.Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.2008;133:339.e9–e17.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.00218331928Search in Google Scholar
Grec RH, Janson G, Branco NC, Moura-Grec PG, Patel MP, Castanha Henriques JF. Intraoral distalizer effects with conventional and skeletal anchorage: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:602–15.GrecRHJansonGBrancoNCMoura-GrecPGPatelMPCastanha HenriquesJF.Intraoral distalizer effects with conventional and skeletal anchorage: a meta-analysis.2013;143:602–15.10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.02423631962Search in Google Scholar