This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Kuswandari S, Nishino M. Mixed dentition space analysis for Indonesian Javanese children. Pediatr Dent J 2006;16:74–83.KuswandariSNishinoMMixed dentition space analysis for Indonesian Javanese children200616748310.1016/S0917-2394(06)70068-4Search in Google Scholar
Alther ER, Koroluk LD, Phillips C. Influence of sex and ethnic tooth-size differences on mixed-dentition space analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:332–9.AltherERKorolukLDPhillipsCInfluence of sex and ethnic tooth-size differences on mixed-dentition space analysis2007132332910.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.043356455417826601Search in Google Scholar
Sillman J. Dimensional changes of the dental arches: a longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod 1964;50:824–42.SillmanJDimensional changes of the dental arches: a longitudinal study from birth to 25 years1964508244210.1016/0002-9416(64)90040-5Search in Google Scholar
Lee-Chan S, Jacobson BN, Chwa KH, Jacobson RS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian-Americans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:293–9.Lee-ChanSJacobsonBNChwaKHJacobsonRSMixed dentition analysis for Asian-Americans1998113293910.1016/S0889-5406(98)70300-2Search in Google Scholar
Moyer RE. Handbook of Orthodontics., 4th ed. Chicago: Mosby-year book medical publisher; 1958:577.MoyerREChicagoMosby-year book medical publisher1958577Search in Google Scholar
Tanaka MM, Johnston LE. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;88:798–801.TanakaMMJohnstonLEThe prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population19748879880110.14219/jada.archive.1974.0158Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Staley RN. Mixed-dentition mandibular arch length analysis: a step-by-step approach using the revised Hixon-Oldfather prediction method. Am J Orthod 1984;86:130–5.BisharaSEStaleyRNMixed-dentition mandibular arch length analysis: a step-by-step approach using the revised Hixon-Oldfather prediction method198486130510.1016/0002-9416(84)90304-XSearch in Google Scholar
Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Orthodontic probability tables for black patients of African descent: mixed dentition analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:545–51.SchirmerURWiltshireWAOrthodontic probability tables for black patients of African descent: mixed dentition analysis19971125455110.1016/S0889-5406(97)70082-9Search in Google Scholar
Bernabe E, Flores-Mir C. Are the lower incisors the best predictors for the unerupted canine and premolars sums ? an analysis of a Peruvian sample. Angle Orthod 2005;75:202–7.BernabeEFlores-MirCAre the lower incisors the best predictors for the unerupted canine and premolars sums ? an analysis of a Peruvian sample2005752027Search in Google Scholar
Lima Martinelli F, Martinelli de Lima E, Rocha R, Tirre-Araujo MS. Prediction of lower permanent canine and premolars width by correlation methods. Angle Orthod 2005;75:805–8.Lima MartinelliFMartinelli de LimaERochaRTirre-AraujoMSPrediction of lower permanent canine and premolars width by correlation methods2005758058Search in Google Scholar
Staley RN, O’Gorman TW, Hoag JF, Shelly TH. Prediction of the widths of unerupted canines and premolars. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;108:185–90.StaleyRNO’GormanTWHoagJFShellyTHPrediction of the widths of unerupted canines and premolars19841081859010.14219/jada.archive.1984.04366584490Search in Google Scholar
Staley RN, Kerber PE. A revision of the Hixon and Oldfather mixed-dentition prediction method. Am J Orthod 1980;78:296–302.StaleyRNKerberPEA revision of the Hixon and Oldfather mixed-dentition prediction method19807829630210.1016/0002-9416(80)90274-26931493Search in Google Scholar
Hixon EH, Old Fther RE. Estimation of the sizes of unerupted cuspid and bicuspid teeth. Angle Orthod 1958;28:236–40.HixonEHOld FtherREEstimation of the sizes of unerupted cuspid and bicuspid teeth19582823640Search in Google Scholar
de Paula S, Almeida MA, Lee PC. Prediction of mesiodistal diameter of unerupted lower canines and premolars using 45 degrees cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:309–14.de PaulaSAlmeidaMALeePCPrediction of mesiodistal diameter of unerupted lower canines and premolars using 45 degrees cephalometric radiography19951073091410.1016/S0889-5406(95)70147-8Search in Google Scholar
Diagne F, Diop-Ba K, Ngom PI, Mbow K. Mixed dentition analysis in a Senegalese population: elaboration of prediction tables. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:178–83.DiagneFDiop-BaKNgomPIMbowKMixed dentition analysis in a Senegalese population: elaboration of prediction tables20031241788310.1016/S0889-5406(03)00390-112923514Search in Google Scholar
Al-Bitar ZB, Al-Omari IK, Sonbol HN, Al-Ahmad HT, Hamdan AM. Mixed dentition analysis in a Jordanian population. Angle Orthod 2008;78:670–5.Al-BitarZBAl-OmariIKSonbolHNAl-AhmadHTHamdanAMMixed dentition analysis in a Jordanian population200878670510.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0670:MDAIAJ]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
Nourallah AW, Gesch D, Khordaji MN, Splieth C. New regression equations for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary population. Angle Orthod 2002;72:216–21.NourallahAWGeschDKhordajiMNSpliethCNew regression equations for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary population20027221621Search in Google Scholar
Bailit HL. Dental variation among populations. An anthropologic view. Dental Clinics of North America 1975;19:125.BailitHLDental variation among populations. An anthropologic view19751912510.1016/S0011-8532(22)00661-9Search in Google Scholar
Jaroontham J, Godfrey K. Mixed dentition space analysis in a Thai population. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:127–34.JaroonthamJGodfreyKMixed dentition space analysis in a Thai population2000221273410.1093/ejo/22.2.127Search in Google Scholar
Legovic M, Novosel A, Legovic A. Regression equations for determining mesiodistal crown diameters of canines and premolars. Angle Orthod 2003;73:314–8.LegovicMNovoselALegovicARegression equations for determining mesiodistal crown diameters of canines and premolars2003733148Search in Google Scholar
Frankel HH, Benz EM. Mixed dentition analysis for black Americans. Pediatr Dent 1986;8:226–30.FrankelHHBenzEMMixed dentition analysis for black Americans1986822630Search in Google Scholar
Rheude B, Lionel SP, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2005;75:300–4.RheudeBLionelSPFerrieraAJacobsonAAn evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning2005753004Search in Google Scholar
Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho Christopher TC. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J 2009;25:97–103.NaiduDScottJOngDHo ChristopherTCValidity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses20092597103Search in Google Scholar
Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101–5.SantoroMGalkinSTeredesaiMNicolayOFCangialosiTJComparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models2003124101510.1016/S0889-5406(03)00152-5Search in Google Scholar
Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794–803.StevensDRFlores-MirCNebbeBRaboudDWHeoGMajorPWValidity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements200612979480310.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023Search in Google Scholar
Garino F, Garino G. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World J Orthod 2002;3:250–4.GarinoFGarinoGComparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts200232504Search in Google Scholar
Zilberman O, Huggare J, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73:301–6.ZilbermanOHuggareJParikakisKAEvaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models2003733016Search in Google Scholar
Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O’Neill J, Noar JH. Digital versus plaster study models: How accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod 2012;39:151–9.AbizadehNMolesDRO’NeillJNoarJHDigital versus plaster study models: How accurate and reproducible are they?201239151910.1179/1465312512Z.00000000023Search in Google Scholar
Krieger E, Seiferth J, Saric I, Jung BA, Wehrbein H. Accuracy of invisalign® treatments in the anterior tooth region. J Orofac Orthop 2011;72:141–9.KriegerESeiferthJSaricIJungBAWehrbeinHAccuracy of invisalign® treatments in the anterior tooth region201172141910.1007/s00056-011-0017-4Search in Google Scholar
Grünheid T, Patel N, De Felippe NL, Wey A, Gaillard PR, Larson BE. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:157–64.GrünheidTPatelNDe FelippeNLWeyAGaillardPRLarsonBEAccuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies20141451576410.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.012Search in Google Scholar
Luu NS, Mandich MA, Tieu LD, Kaipatur N, Flores-Mir C. The validity and reliability of mixed-dentition analysis methods: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:1143–53.LuuNSMandichMATieuLDKaipaturNFlores-MirCThe validity and reliability of mixed-dentition analysis methods: a systematic review201114211435310.14219/jada.archive.2011.0083Search in Google Scholar
Santos IRMD, Noronha WP. Examination of Tanaka & Johnston’s prediction regarding mesiodistal measurements of unerupted canines and premolars. RGO. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) 2013;61:55–60.SantosIRMDNoronhaWPExamination of Tanaka & Johnston’s prediction regarding mesiodistal measurements of unerupted canines and premolars. RGO2013615560Search in Google Scholar
Tayyab M, Hussain U, Ayub A. Applicability of Tanaka and Johnston mixed dentition analysis in a Peshawar sample. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2014;34:322–5.TayyabMHussainUAyubAApplicability of Tanaka and Johnston mixed dentition analysis in a Peshawar sample2014343225Search in Google Scholar
Dhakal J, Shrestha RM, Shrestha S. Applicability of Tanaka & Johnston Analysis and Prediction of New Equation for Contemporary Nepalese Sample. Orthod J Nepal 2013;3:14–8.DhakalJShresthaRMShresthaSApplicability of Tanaka & Johnston Analysis and Prediction of New Equation for Contemporary Nepalese Sample2013314810.3126/ojn.v3i1.9269Search in Google Scholar
Pardede DAD, Budiardjo SB, Rizal MF. Applicability of Tanaka-Johnston mixed-dentition analysis in Indonesian children. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research 2017;10:486–9.PardedeDADBudiardjoSBRizalMFApplicability of Tanaka-Johnston mixed-dentition analysis in Indonesian children2017104869Search in Google Scholar
Thimmegowda U, Divyashree, Niwlikar KB, Khare V, Prabhakar AC. Applicability of Tanaka Johnston Method and Prediction of Mesiodistal Width of Canines and Premolars in Children. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:Zc16–Zc19.ThimmegowdaUDivyashreeNiwlikarKBKhareVPrabhakarACApplicability of Tanaka Johnston Method and Prediction of Mesiodistal Width of Canines and Premolars in Children201711Zc16Zc1910.7860/JCDR/2017/25962.9995553547628764286Search in Google Scholar
Arslan SG, Dildeş N, Kama JD, Gen C. Mixed-dentition analysis in a Turkish population. World J Orthod 2009;10:135–40.ArslanSGDildeşNKamaJDGenCMixed-dentition analysis in a Turkish population20091013540Search in Google Scholar
Carey C. Linear arch dimension and tooth size: An evaluation of the bone and dental structures in cases involving the possible reduction of dental units in treatment. Am J Orthod 1949;35:762–75.CareyCLinear arch dimension and tooth size: An evaluation of the bone and dental structures in cases involving the possible reduction of dental units in treatment1949357627510.1016/0002-9416(49)90148-718142405Search in Google Scholar
Moyers RE Moyers RE. Analysis of dentition and occlusion. Handbook of orthodontics, 4th ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1988.MoyersREMoyersREChicagoYear Book Medical Publishers1988Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Abdallah EM, Garcia AF. Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:416–22.BisharaSEJakobsenJRAbdallahEMGarciaAFComparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States1989964162210.1016/0889-5406(89)90326-02816841Search in Google Scholar
Yuen KK, Tang EL, So LL. Mixed dentition analysis for Hong Kong Chinese. Angle Orthod 1998;68:21–8.YuenKKTangELSoLLMixed dentition analysis for Hong Kong Chinese199868218Search in Google Scholar
Mahmoud BK, Abu Asab SHI, Taib H. Accuracy of four tooth size prediction methods on Malay population. International Scholarly Research Notices 2012;2012:1–4.MahmoudBKAbu AsabSHITaibHAccuracy of four tooth size prediction methods on Malay population2012201214Search in Google Scholar