Patient | Treatment approach | Change over the past 5–10 years |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
More | Less | No Change | ||
Child/Adolescent | Extraction of all first PMs | 1 (2.4) | 27 (64.3) | 14 (33.3) |
Extraction of all second PMs | 16 (37.2) | 15 (34.9) | 12 (27.9) | |
Other extractions | 2 (4.7) | 9 (20.9) | 32 (74.4) | |
IPR | 19 (44.2) | 0 | 24 (55.8) | |
Transverse expansion | 19 (45.2) | 3 (7.1) | 20 (47.7) | |
Incisor proclination | 18 (41.9) | 3 (7) | 22 (51.1) | |
Distal movement with TADs | 12 (29.3) | 3 (7.3) | 26 (63.4) | |
Combined IPR and arch lengthening | 24 (55.8) | 0 | 19 (44.2) | |
Adult | Extraction of all first PMs | 0 | 24 (58.5) | 17 (41.5) |
Extraction of all second PMs | 8 (20.5) | 15 (38.5) | 16 (41) | |
Other extractions | 5 (13.5) | 9 (24.3) | 23 (62.2) | |
IPR | 34 (85) | 0 | 6 (15) | |
Transverse expansion | 16 (41) | 3 (7.7) | 20 (51.3) | |
Incisor proclination | 20 (50) | 2 | 18 | |
Distal movement with TADs | 7 (18.4) | 4 (10.5) | 27 (71.1) | |
Combined IPR and arch lengthening | 23 (57.5) | 1 (2.5 | 16 (40) |
Patient group | Factor | Influence |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Major | Moderate | Minor | None | ||
Child/Adolescent | Facial aesthetics | 24 (54.54) | 17 (38.63) | 1 (2.27) | 2 (4.58) |
Smile aesthetics | 18 (40.91) | 18 (40.91) | 5 (11.36) | 3 (6.82) | |
TMJ symptoms | 2 (4.58) | 3 (6.82) | 10 (22.73) | 29 (65.87) | |
Appliances used | 5 (11.36) | 8 (18.18) | 18 (40.91) | 13 (29.55) | |
Increased use of IPR | 6 (13.64) | 19 (43.18) | 15 (34.1) | 4 (9.08) | |
Increased use of transverse expansion | 2 (4.58) | 17 (38.64) | 20 (45.55) | 5 (11.23) | |
Periodontal implications | 14 (32.56) | 13 (30.23) | 12 (27.91) | 4 (9.3) | |
Stability due to effect of extractions | 2 (4.58) | 12 (27.28) | 17 (38.59 | 13 (29.55) | |
Treatment duration | 0 | 11 (25) | 23 (52.3) | 10 (22.7) | |
Change in mode of anchorage supplementation | 2 (4.58) | 11 (25) | 18 (40.91) | 13 (29.51) | |
Change in rate of BR use | 6 (13.64) | 7 (15.93) | 10 (22.7) | 21 (47.73) | |
Adult | Facial aesthetics | 20 (47.62) | 17 (40.48) | 2 (4.76) | 3 (7.14) |
Smile aesthetics | 20 (47.62) | 14 (33.33) | 4 (9.53) | 4 (9.53) | |
TMJ symptoms | 0 | 3 (7.14) | 10 (23.81) | 29 (69.05) | |
Appliances used | 6 (14.29) | 6 (14.29) | 18 (42.86) | 12 (28.56) | |
Increased use of IPR | 6 (14.29) | 18 (42.86) | 16 (38.1) | 2 (4.76) | |
Increased use of transverse expansion | 2 (4.76) | 17 (40.48) | 19 (45.24) | 4 (9.52) | |
Periodontal implications | 14 (34.15) | 12 (29.27) | 11 (26.83) | 4 (9.76) | |
Stability due to effect of extractions | 4 (9.52) | 8 (19.05) | 17 (40.48) | 13 (30.95) | |
Treatment duration | 1 (2.4) | 10 (23.81) | 25 (50.95) | 6 (14.29) | |
Change in mode of anchorage supplementation | 2 (4.76) | 11 (26.2) | 20 (47.62) | 9 (21.42) | |
Change in rate of BR use | 6 (14.29) | 7 (16.67) | 8 (19.04) | 21 (50) |
Patient group | Factor | Influence | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Major | Moderate | Minor | None | ||
Child/Adolescent | Facial aesthetics | 2 (18.19) | 5 (45.43) | 2 (18.19) | 2 (18.19) |
Smile aesthetics | 2 (18.19) | 5 (45.43) | 2 (18.19) | 2 (18.19) | |
TMJ symptoms | 0 | 0 | 3 (27.27) | 8 (72.27) | |
Appliances used | 0 | 1 (9.09) | 1 (9.09) | 9 (81.81) | |
Increased use of IPR | 0 | 0 | 9 (81.81) | 2 (18.19) | |
Increased use of transverse expansion | 0 | 0 | 3 (27.27) | 8 (72.73) | |
Periodontal implications | 2 (18.19) | 3 (27.27) | 2 (18.19) | 4 (36.35) | |
Stability due to effect of extractions | 9 (81.81) | 2 (18.19) | 0 | 0 | |
Treatment duration | 0 | 3 (27.27) | 6 (54.54) | 2 (18.19) | |
Change in mode of anchorage supplementation | 0 | 0 | 2 (18.19) | 9 (81.81) | |
Change in rate of BR use | 0 | 2 (18.19) | 6 (54.54) | 3 (27.27) | |
Adult | Facial aesthetics | 1 (14.29) | 0 | 2 (28.58) | 4 (57.16) |
Smile aesthetics | 1 (14.29) | 0 | 2 (28.58) | 4 (57.16) | |
TMJ symptoms | 0 | 0 | 1 (14.29) | 6 (85.74) | |
Appliances used | 0 | 1 (14.29) | 1 (14.29) | 5 (71.45) | |
Increased use of IPR | 0 | 0 | 3 (42.87) | 4 (57.16) | |
Increased use of transverse expansion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (100) | |
Periodontal implications | 0 | 0 | 1 (14.29) | 6 (85.74) | |
Stability due to effect of extractions | 1 (14.29) | 4 (57.16) | 0 | 2 (28.58) | |
Treatment duration | 0 | 2 (28.58) | 3 (42.87) | 2 (28.58) | |
Change in mode of anchorage supplementation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (100) | |
Change in rate of BR use | 0 | 0 | 3 (42.87) | 4 (57.16) |
|
|
---|---|
Gender | |
Male | 116 (71.2) |
Female | 43 (26.4) |
Prefer not to say | 4 (2.4) |
Where specialist qualification acquired | |
Australia | 139 (85.28) |
New Zealand | 3 (1.84) |
Other | 21 (12.88) |
Work type | |
Private | 136 (83.4) |
Public/university and private | 22 (13.5) |
Public/university | 2 (1.2) |
Other | 3 (1.9) |
State/Territory of main workplace | |
NSW / ACT | 49 (30) |
Queensland | 31 (19) |
South Australia / NT | 25 (15.33) |
Victoria/Tasmania | 38 (23.31) |
Western Australia | 20 (12.36) |
Patient | Treatment approach | Change over the past 5–10 years N (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
More | Less | No change | ||
Child/Adolescent | Extraction of all first PMs | 9 (75) | 2 (16.7) | 1 (8.3) |
Extraction of all second PMSs | 8 (66.6) | 2 (16.7) | 2 (16.7) | |
Other extractions | 7 (58.3) | 2 (16.7) | 3 (25) | |
IPR | 3 (25) | 5 (41.7) | 4 (33.3) | |
Transverse expansion | 0 | 4 (33.3) | 8 (66.7) | |
Incisor proclination | 5 (41.7) | 3 (25) | 4 (33.3) | |
Distal movement with TADs | 0 | 6 (50) | 6 (50) | |
Combined IPR and arch lengthening | 0 | 6 (50) | 6 (50) | |
Adult | Extraction of all first PMs | 3 (30) | 3 (30) | 4 (40) |
Extraction of all second PMs | 6 (60) | 1 (10) | 3 (30) | |
Other extractions | 3 (30) | 2 | 5 (50) | |
IPR | 4 (44.4) | 2 (22.2) | 3 (33.3) | |
Transverse expansion | 0 | 1 (10) | 9 (90) | |
Incisor proclination | 2 | 2 | 6 (60) | |
Distal movement with TADs | 0 | 5 (50) | 5 (50) | |
Combined IPR and arch lengthening | 0 | 5 (50) | 5 (50) |