This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Pont A. Der Zahn-Index in der Orthodontie. Zahnarztuche Orthopadie 1909;3:306-21.Search in Google Scholar
Dalidjan M, Sampson W, Townsend G. Prediction of dental arch development: an assessment of Pont’s Index in three human populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:465-75.Search in Google Scholar
Lew K. The effect of variations in the mandibular plane angle on the Pont’s Index. Funct Orthod 1991;8:24-7.Search in Google Scholar
Thu KM, Winn T, Abdullah N, Jayasinghe JAP, Chandima GL. The maxillary arch and its relationship to cephalometric landmarks of selected Malay ethnic group. Malays J Med Scien 2005;12:29-38.Search in Google Scholar
Farkas LG, ed. Antropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press, 1994:238-49.Search in Google Scholar
Hajnis K, Farkas LG, Ngim RCK, Lee ST, Venkatadri G. Racial and ethnic morphometric differences in the craniofacial complex. In: Anthropometry of the head and face. New York: Raven Press, 1994:201-18.Search in Google Scholar
Agnihotri G, Gulati M. Maxillary molar and premolar indices in North Indians: a dimorphic study. Internet J Biol Anthrop 2008;2:1.Search in Google Scholar
Lavelle CL. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod 1972;61:29-37.Search in Google Scholar
Hotz R. Orthodontia In Everyday Practice. Baltimore: The William and Wilkins company. 1974:72-82Search in Google Scholar
Ling JY, Wong RW. Dental arch widths of Southern Chinese. Angle Orthod 2009;79:54-63.Search in Google Scholar
Gupta DS, Sharma VP, Aggarwal SP. Pont’s Index as applied on Indians. Angle Orthod 1979;49:269-71.Search in Google Scholar
Al-Khatib AR, Rajion ZA, Yusdirman AY. Comparison of the facial features between two Malay ethnics applying geometric morphometric method: A preliminary study. Malays J Med Sci 2008;15(Supp 1):86.Search in Google Scholar
Sayin MO, Turkkahraman H. Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion and subjects with Class I ideal occlusion. Angle Orthod 2004;74:356-60.Search in Google Scholar
Nimkarn Y, Miles PG, O’Reilly MT, Weyant RJ. The validity of maxillary expansion indices. Angle Orthod 1995;65:321-6.Search in Google Scholar
Alvaran N, Roldan SI, Buschang PH. Maxillary and mandibular arch widths of Colombians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:649-56.Search in Google Scholar
Sillman JH. Dimensional changes of the dental arches: longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod 1964;50:824-42.Search in Google Scholar
Knott VB. Longitudinal study of dental arch widths at four stages of dentition. Angle Orthod 1972;42:387-94.Search in Google Scholar
Cassidy KM, Harris EF, Tolley EA, Keim RG. Genetic influence on dental arch form in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1998;68:445-54.Search in Google Scholar
Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, Komposch G. Transverse development of the craniofacial skeleton and dentition between 7 and 15 years of age - a longitudinal postero-anterior cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:31-42.Search in Google Scholar
Ngeow WC, Al-Junid ST. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays. Singapore Med J 2009;50:525-8.Search in Google Scholar
Ngeow WC, Al-Junid ST. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of the Malaysian Indians. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:313-19.Search in Google Scholar
Sergl HG, Reinhardt R, Zentner A, Schmidt J. A dental arch index related to tooth size and facial breadth. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1994;55:119-25.Search in Google Scholar
Keshvad A, Winstanley RB, Hooshmand T. Intercondylar width as a guide to setting up complete denture teeth. J Oral Rehab 2000;27:217-26.Search in Google Scholar
Al-Junid ST. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of the Malaysian. MClindent Thesis. University of Malaya, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
