This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: a progress report. Am J Orthod 1965;51:901–12.Search in Google Scholar
Silverman E, Cohen M, Gianelly AA, Dietz VS. A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets. Am J Orthod 1972;62:236–44.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas RG. Indirect bonding: simplicity in action. J Clin Orthod 1979;13:93–106.Search in Google Scholar
Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels III DS. 2008 JCO Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, Part 1: Results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2008;42: 625–40.Search in Google Scholar
Zachrisson BU, Brobakken BO. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978;74:62–78.Search in Google Scholar
Read MJ, O’Brien KD. A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:259–62.Search in Google Scholar
Aguirre MJ, King GJ, Waldron JM. Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1982;82: 269–76.Search in Google Scholar
Hocevar RA, Vincent HF. Indirect versus direct bonding: bond strength and failure location. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:367–71.Search in Google Scholar
Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:13–23.Search in Google Scholar
Swartz ML. Limitations of in vitro orthodontic bond strength testing. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:207–10.Search in Google Scholar
Klocke A, Shi J, Kahl-Nieke B, Bismayer U. Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 2003;73:176–80.Search in Google Scholar
Miles PG, Weyant RJ. A clinical comparison of two chemically-cured adhesives used for indirect bonding. J Orthod 2003;30:331–6.Search in Google Scholar
Miles PG. Indirect bonding with a flowable light-cured adhesive. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:646–7.Search in Google Scholar
Miles PG, Weyant RJ. A comparison of two indirect bonding adhesives. Angle Orthod 2005;75:1019–23.Search in Google Scholar
Polat O, Karaman AI, Buyukyilmaz T. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths and in vivo analysis of bond survival of indirect-bonding resins. Angle Orthod 2004;74:405–9.Search in Google Scholar
Swartz M. Bond strength of a universal orthodontic bonding agent. Clinical Impressions 2005;14:14–16.Search in Google Scholar
Thompson MA, Drummond JL, BeGole EA. Bond strength analysis of custom base variables in indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:9. e15–20.Search in Google Scholar
Miles PG. A comparison of retention rates of brackets with thermally-cured and light-cured custom bases in indirect bonding procedures. Aust Orthod J 2000;16:115–17.Search in Google Scholar
Klocke A, Shi J, Kahl-Nieke B, Bismayer U. Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 2003;73:176–80.Search in Google Scholar
Miles P. Does microetching enamel reduce bracket failure when indirect bonding mandibular posterior teeth? Aust Orthod J 2008;24:1–4.Search in Google Scholar
Klocke A, Tadic D, Vaziri F, Kahl-Nieke B. Custom base preaging in indirect bonding. Angle Orthod 2004;74: 106–11.Search in Google Scholar
