This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;106:472–80.Search in Google Scholar
Sims AP, Waters NE, Birnie DJ, Pethybridge RJ. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation. Eur J Orthod 1993; 15:377–85.Search in Google Scholar
Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:283–91.Search in Google Scholar
Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC. Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:228–34.Search in Google Scholar
Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:220–7.Search in Google Scholar
Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132:208–15.Search in Google Scholar
Miles PG. Smartclip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference? Aust Orthod J 2005;21: 123–7.Search in Google Scholar
Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 versus conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod 2006;6:480–5.Search in Google Scholar
Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon 3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:470.e1–8.Search in Google Scholar
Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Lee RT. Randomised controlled trial of mandibular alignment with two pre-adjusted appliances. J Orthod 2008;35:223–4 (Abstract).Search in Google Scholar
O’Dwyer LA, Littlewood SJ, Rahman S, Spencer RJ. Efficiency of SmartClip self-ligating brackets compared to brackets using conventional ligation. J Orthod 2008;35:226 (Abstract).Search in Google Scholar
Hamilton R, Goonewardene MS, Murray K. Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets. Aust Orthod J 2008;24:102–9.Search in Google Scholar
Justine Brock. A comparison of initial alignment and pain with self-ligating and conventionally ligated bracket systems. University of Queensland, Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Clinical Dentistry (Orthodontics), 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Berger J, Byloff FK. The clinical efficiency of self-ligated brackets. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:304–8.Search in Google Scholar
Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131: 395–9.Search in Google Scholar
Little R. The Irregularity Index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975;68: 554-63.Search in Google Scholar
Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Active or passive self-ligating brackets? A randomized control trial of comparative efficiency in resolving maxillary anterior crowding in adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; Accepted for publication.Search in Google Scholar
Scott P, Sherriff M, DiBiase AT, Cobourne MT. Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orth 2008;30:227–32.Search in Google Scholar
Rahman S, Spencer RJ, O’Dwyer LA, Littlewood SJ. SmartClip versus a conventional pre-adjusted edgewise appliance – Is there a difference in pain and breakages? J Orthod 2008;35:226–7 (Abstract).Search in Google Scholar
Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2009;79:46–50.Search in Google Scholar
