SmartClip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference?

1 Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC. Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:228–34. Search in Google Scholar

2 Andreasen GF, Quevedo FR. Evaluation of frictional forces in the 0.022 x 0.028 edgewise bracket in vitro. J Biomech 1970;3:151–60. Search in Google Scholar

3 Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod 1980;78:593–609. Search in Google Scholar

4 Huffman D, Way DC. A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along archwires of two different sizes. Am J Orthod 1983;83:453–9. Search in Google Scholar

5 Peterson L, Spencer R, Andreasen G. A comparison of friction resistance for Nitinol and stainless steel wire in edgewise brackets. Quintessence Int 1982;5:563–71. Search in Google Scholar

6 Kusy RP, Whitley JQ, Mayhew MJ, Buckthal JE. Surface roughness of orthodontic arch wire via laser spectroscopy. Angle Orthod 1988;58:33–45. Search in Google Scholar

7 Bednar JR, Gruendeman GW, Sandrik JL. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100: 513–22. Search in Google Scholar

8 Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124: 403–9. Search in Google Scholar

9 Ireland AJ, Sherriff M, McDonald F. Effect of bracket and wire composition on frictional forces. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13:322–8. Search in Google Scholar

10 Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Frictional resistance of metal-lined ceramic brackets versus conventional stainless steel brackets and development of 3-D friction maps. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:364–74. Search in Google Scholar

11 Berger JL. The influence of the SPEED bracket’s self-ligating design on force levels in tooth movement: a comparative in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97: 219–28. Search in Google Scholar

12 Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Ricciardi A, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:395–402. Search in Google Scholar

13 Taylor NG, Ison K. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments. Angle Orthod 1996;66:215–22. Search in Google Scholar

14 Edwards GD, Davies EH, Jones SP. The ex vivo effect of ligation technique on the static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets and archwires. Br J Orthod 1995;22:145–53. Search in Google Scholar

15 Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:416–22. Search in Google Scholar

16 Rock WP, Wilson HJ. The effect of bracket type and ligation method upon forces exerted by orthodontic archwires. Br J Orthod 1989;16:213–7. Search in Google Scholar

17 Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod 2003;73:418–30. Search in Google Scholar

18 Voudouris JC. Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:119–40. Search in Google Scholar

19 Henao SP, Kusy RP. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. Angle Orthod 2004;74:202–11. Search in Google Scholar

20 Damon DH. The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1: 52–61. Search in Google Scholar

21 Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:220–7. Search in Google Scholar

22 Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs. conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod Accepted. Search in Google Scholar

23 Little R. The Irregularity Index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975;68: 554–63. Search in Google Scholar

24 Pizzoni L, Raunholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:283–91. Search in Google Scholar