[
AWIN (2015). AWIN welfare assessment protocol for turkeys. Accessed Jun 2021, from http://air.unimi.it/retrieve/handle/2434/269107/384771/AWINProtocolTurkeys.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abdelfattah E., Vezzoli G., Makagon M.M. (2020). On-farm welfare assessment of commercial Pekin duck: a comparison of methods. Poultry Sci., 99: 689‒697.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baéza E., Guillier L., Petracci M. (2022). Review: Production factors affecting poultry carcass and meat quality attributes. Animal, 16: 100331.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benincasa N.C., Sakamoto K.S., da Silva I.J.O., Lobos C.M.V. (2020). Animal welfare: impact of pre-slaughter operations on the current poultry industry. J. Anim. Biometeorol., 8: 104‒ 110.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BenSassi N. Averós X., Estevez I. (2019). Broiler chickens on-farm welfare assessment: estimating the robustness of the transect sampling methods. Front. Vet. Sci., 6: 236.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biesek J., Banaszak M., Adamski M. (2021). Ducks’ growth, meat quality, bone strength, and jejunum strength depend on zeolite in feed and long-term factors. Animals, 11: 1015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bright A., Jones T.A., Dawkins M.S. (2006). A non-intrusive methods of assessing plumage conditions in commercial flocks of laying hens. Anim. Welf., 15: 113‒118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butterworth A. (2009). Animal welfare indicators and their use in society. In: Welfare of production animals: assessment and management of risks, Smulders H., Algers B. (eds). Food Safety Assurance and Veterinary Public Health: Wageningen Academic Publisher, 371‒389.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butterworth A., Mench J.A., Wielebnowski N. (2011). Practical strategies to assess (and improve) welfare’. In: Animal Welfare, Appleby M.C., Mench J.A., Olsson I.A.S., Hughes B.O. (eds). CABI Publishing Oxford, pp. 200‒214.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Byrd C.J., Main R.P., Makagon M.M. (2016). Evaluating Pekin duck walking ability using a treadmill performance test. Poultry Sci., 95: 2244‒2249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colton S., Fraley G.S. (2014). The effects of environmental enrichment devices on feather picking in commercially housed Pekin ducks. Poultry Sci., 93: 2143‒2150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Campbell D.L.M., Belson S., Erasmus M.A., Lea J.M. (2022). Behavior and welfare impacts of water provision via misting in commercial Pekin ducks. J. Anim. Sci., 100: 1–13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dawkins M.S. (1999). The role of behavior in the assessment of poultry welfare. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 55: 295‒303.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DEFRA (2011). Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Poultry Meat Quality Guide. Document is available on the Defra website: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69331/pb13457-poultrymeat-quality-guide.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deschutter A., Leeson S. (1986). Feather growth and development. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 42: 259‒267.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dong Y., Karcher D.M., Erasmus M.A. (2021). Self- and conspecific-directed pecking behawior of commercial Pekin ducks. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 235: 105223.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dowing J.A. (2022). Effect of light and stocking density on performance, breast muscle yield and potential damage caused by feather pecking in two strains of commercial Pekin ducks. Anim. Prod. Sci., 62: 870‒879.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duan E., Han G., Zhao S., Ma Y., Lv Y., Bai Z. (2023). Regulation of meat duck activeness through photoperiod based on deep learning. Animals, 13: 3520.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duggan B.M., Hocking P.M., Clements D.N. (2016). Gait in ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) and chicken (Gallus gallus) ‒ similarities in adaptation to high growth rate. Biol. Open, 5: 1077‒ 1085.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duggan B.M., Hocking P.M., Schwarz T., Clements D.N. (2015). Differences in hindlimb morphology of ducks and chickens: effects of domestication and selection. Genet. Sel. Evol., 47: 88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Animal Weflare (AHAW Panel), Nilsen S.S., Alvarez J., Bicout D.J., Calistri P., Canali E., Drewe J.A., Garin-Bastuji B., Rojas J.L.G., Schmidt C.G., Herskin M., Michel V., Chueca M.A.M., Padalino B., Roberts H.C., Spoolder H., Stahl K., Viltrop A., Winckler C. Berg C., Edwards S., Knierim U., Riber A., Salamon A., Tiemann I., Fabris C., Manakidou A., Mosbach-Schultz O., der Stede Y.V., Vitali M., Velarde A. (2023). Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm. EFSA J., 21: 7992.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
El Sabry M.I., Almasri O. (2013). Global waterfowl production: stocking rate is a key factor for improving productivity and well-being ‒ a review. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 55: 419.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eratalar S.A. (2021). The effests of plastic saltted floor and a deep-litter system on growth performance of hybrid Pekin ducks. Arch. Anim. Breed., 64: 1‒6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erdem E., Onbaşilar E.E., Hacan Ö.G. (2015). Effects of 16L:8D photoperiod on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat composition, and blood parameters of Pekin duck. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 39: 568‒575.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferrante V., Lolli S., Ferrari L., Watanabe T.T.N., Termolada C., Marchewka J., Estevez I. (2018). Differences in pervalence of welfare indicators in male and female turkeys flocks (Melegrisgallopavo). Poultry Sci., 98: 1568‒1574.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fraley S.M., Fraley G.S., Karcher D.M., Makagon M.M., Lilburn M.S. (2013). Influence of plastic slatted floors compared with pine shaving litter on Pekin duck conditio during the summer months. Poultry Sci., 92: 1706‒1711.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghanima M.M.A., El-Hack M.E., Taha A.E., Tufarelli V., Laudadio V., Naiel M.A.E. (2020). Assessment of stocking rate and housing system on performance, carcass traits, blood indices, and meat quality of french Pekin ducks. Agriculture, 10: 273.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gontar Ł., Sitarek-Andrzejczyk M., Kochański M., Buła M., Drutowska A., Zych D., Markiewicz J. (2022). Dynamic and diversity of microbial contamination in poultry bedding materials containing parts of medicinal plants. Materials, 15: 1290.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Granquist E.G., Vasdal G., de Jong I.C., Moe R.O. (2019). Lameness and its relationship with health and production measures in broiler chickens. Animal, 13: 2365‒2372.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gustafson L.A., Cheng H.W., Garner J.P., Pajor E.A., Mench J.A. (2007). The effects of different bill-trimming methods on the well-being of Pekin ducks. Poultry Sci., 86: 1831‒ 1839.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hahn G., Judas M., Berk J. (2020). Forced locomotor activity improves walking ablibity of male turkeys and modifies carcass characteristics. Br. Poult. Sci., 61: 107‒115.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hester P.Y., Shea-Moore M. (2003). Beak trimming egg-laying strains of chickens. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 59: 458‒474.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
House G.M., Sobotnik E.B., Nelsen J.R., Arche G.S. (2021 a). Pekin duck productivity, physiological stress, immune response and behawior under 20L:4D and 16L:8D photoperiods. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 240: 105351.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
House G.M., Sobotik E.B., Nelson J.R., Archer G.S. (2021 b). Experimental monochromatic light-emitting diode fixture impacts Pekin duck stress and eye development. Poultry Sci., 100: 101507.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hua D., Xue F., Xin H., Zhao Y., Wang Y., Xiong B. (2021). Effects of monochromatic lights on the growth performance, carcass characteristics, eyeball development, oxidation resistance, and cecal bacteria of Pekin ducks. Anim. Biosci., 5: 931‒940.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones T.A., Dawkins M.S. (2010 a). Environmental and management factors affecting Pekin duck production and welfare on commercial farms in UK. Br Poult. Sci., 51: 12‒21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones T.A., Dawkins M.S. (2010 b). Effects of environment on Pekin ducks behavior and its correlation with body condition on commercial farms in the UK. Br. Poult. Sci., 51: 319‒ 325.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones T.A., Waitt, C.D., Dawkins M.S. (2009). Water off a duck’s back: showers and troughs match ponds for improving duck welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 116: 52‒57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karcher D.M., Makong M.M., Fraley S.M., Lilburn M.S. (2013). Influence of raised plastic floors compared with pine shaving litter on environment and Pekin duck condition. Poultry Sci., 92: 583‒590.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee S., Lee I., Yeo U., Kim J., Kim R., Kwon K. (2022). Dynamic energy model of a naturally ventilated duck house and comparative analysis of energy loads according to ventilation type. Biosyst. Eng., 219: 218‒234.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liao S.Ch., Lu P.X., Shen S.Y., Hsiao CH.Ch., Lien Ch.Y., Wang S.D., Lin T.Y., Tu P.A., (2001). Effects of different swimming pool conditions and floor types on growth performance and footpad dermatitis in indor-reared white roman geese. Animals, 11: 1705.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lourenço-Silva M.I., Almeida Paz I.CL., Chaves G.H.C., Lima Almeida C., Ouros C.C., Lucas Souza S.R., Milbradt E.L., Caldara F.R., Satin A.J.G., Costa G.A., Glavian A.A.G. (2021). Behaviour and animal welfare indicators of broiler chickens housed in an enriched environment. PLoS One, 16: e0256963.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Makagon M.M., Riber A.B. (2022). Setting research driven duck-welfare standards: a systematic review of Pekin duck welfare research. Poultry Sci., 101: 101614.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Makagon M.M., Woolley R., Karcher D. (2015). Assessing the waddle: An evaluation of the 3-point gait score for ducks. Poultry Sci., 94: 1729‒1734.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marchewka J., Estevez I., Vezzoli G., Ferrante V., Makagon M.M. (2015). The transect methods: a novel approach to on-farm welfare assessment of commercial turkeys. Poultry Sci., 94: 7‒16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marchewka J., Vasdal G., Moe R.O. (2019). Identifing welfare issues in turkey hen and tom flocks applying the transect walk methods. Poultry Sci., 98: 3391‒3399.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marchewka J., Watanabe T.T.N., Ferrante V., Estevez I. (2013). Welfare assessment in broiler farms: transect walks versus individual scoring. Poultry Sci., 92: 2588‒2599.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mohammed H.H., Abdelaty A.I., Saleem A.Y., Youssef M.I., Abdel-Hamid S. (2019). Effect of bedding materials on duck’s welfare and growth performance. Slov. Vet. Res., 56: 149‒ 156.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Driscoll K.K.M., Broom D.M. (2011). Does access to open water affect the health of Pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos)? Poultry Sci. 90: 299–307.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oketch E.O., Kim Y.B., Yu M., Hong J. S., Nawarathne S.R., Heo J.M. (2023). Differences in bedding material could alter the growth performance of White Pekin ducks raised for 42 days. J. Anim. Sc. Technol., 65: 377‒386.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park M., Britton D., Daley W., McMurray G., Navaei M., Samoylov A., Usher C., Xu J. (2022). Artificial intelligence, sensors, robots, and transportation systems drive an innovative future for poultry broiler and breeder management. Anim. Front., 12: 40‒48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paxton H., Daley M.A., Corr S.A., Hutchinson J.R. (2013). The gait dynamics of the modern broiler chicken: a cautionary tale of selective breeding. J. Exp. Biol., 216: 3237–3248.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson C.I., Rice M., Makagon M.M., Karcher D.M. (2015). Duck gait: Relationship to hip angle, bone ash, bone density, and morphology. Poultry Sci., 94: 1060‒1067.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodenburg T.B., Bracke M.B.M., Berk J., Cooper J., Faure J.M., Guémené D., Pingel H., Reiter K., Servière J., Ruis M.A.M. (2005). Welfare of ducks in European duck husbandry systems. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 61: 633‒646.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shepherd E.M., Fairchild B.D., Ritz C.W. (2017). Alternative bedding materials and litter depth impact litter moisture and footpad dermatitis. J. Appl. Poult. Sci., 26: 518‒528.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shin H., Kwak Y., Jo S-K., Kim S-H., Huh J-H. (2023). Development of an optimal mechanical ventilation system control strategy based on weather forecasting data for outdoor air cooling in livestock housing. Energy, 268: 126649.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sousa F.C., Tinôco I.F.F., de Silva J.N., Baptista F.J.F., Souza C.F., de Silva A.L. (2017). Gas emission in the poultry production. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol., 5: 49‒55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sun D., Xu C., Liu Y., Dai Z., Pan Z., Chen R., Guo R., Chen F., Shi Z., Ying S. (2023). The impact of different relative humidity levels on the production performance, slaughter performance, and meat quality of White Pekin ducks aged 4 to 42 days. Animals, 13: 3711.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Termotecnica Pericoli (2005). Exhaust Fans for Agricultural and Industrial Applications. Avaiable: https://www.pericoli.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/VENTILATION_E__E.pdf#page=6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Wyhe R.C., Applegate T.J., Lilburn M.S., Karcher D.M. (2012). A comparison of long bone development in historical and contemporary ducks. Poultry Sci., 91: 2858–2865.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xie M., Jiang Y., Tang J., Wen Z.G., Huang W., Hou S.S. (2014). Effects of stocking density on growth performance, carcass traits, and foot pad lesions of White Pekin duck. Poultry Sci., 93: 1644–1648.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeng Q.F., Zhang Q., Chen X., Doster A., Murdoch R., Makagon M., Gardner A., Applegate T.J. (2015). Effects of dietary methionine concent on growth performance, carcass traits, and feather growth of Pekin duck from 15 to 35 days of age. Poultry Sci., 94: 1592‒1599.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zheng H., Zhang T., Cheng F., Zeng J., Yang X. (2021). Desing and implementation of poultry farming information management system based on cloud database. Animals, 11: 900.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhu Y.W., Xie M., Huang W., Yang L., Hou S.S. (2013). Effects of biotin on growth performance and foot pad dermatitis of starter White Pekin ducklings. Br. Poult. Sci., 53: 646‒650.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zuowei S., Yan L., Yuan L., Jiao H., Song Z., Guo Y., Lin H. (2011). Stocking density affects the growth performance of broilers in a sex-dependent fashion. Poultry Sci., 90: 1406–1415.
]Search in Google Scholar
