[
Ahmed H., Andrabi S.M.H., Jahan S. (2016). Semen quality parameters as fertility predictors of water Buffalo bull spermatozoa during low-breeding season. Theriogenology, 86: 1516–1522.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.05.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Al Naib A., Hanrahan J.P., Lonergan P., Fair S. (2011). In vitro assessment of sperm from bulls of high and low field fertility. Theriogenology, 76: 161–167.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.10.038
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alm K., Taponen J., Dahlbom M., Tuunainen E., Koskinen E., Andersson M.A. (2001). A novel automated fluorometric assay to evaluate sperm viability and fertility in dairy bulls. Theriogenology, 56: 677–684.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00599-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bailey J. L., Bilodeau J. F., Cormier N. (2000). Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals, a damaging and capacitating phenomenon. J. Androl., 21: 1–7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balao da Silva C.M., Ortega Ferrusola C., Morillo Rodriguez A., Gallardo Bolaños J.M., Plaza Dávila M., Morrell J.M., Rodriguez Martínez H., Tapia J.A., Aparicio I.M., Peña F.J. (2013). Sex sorting increases the permeability of the membrane of stallion spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 138: 241–251.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.02.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ballachey B.E., Hohenboken W.D., Evenson D.P. (1987). Heterogeneity of sperm nuclear chromatin structure and its relationship to bull fertility. Biol. Reprod., 36: 915–925.10.1095/biolreprod36.4.915
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bochenek M., Smorąg Z., Pilch J. (2001). Sperm chromatin structure assay of bulls qualified for artificial insemination. Theriogenology, 56: 557–567.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00588-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boe-Hansen G.B., Morris I.D., Ersboll A.K., Greve T., Christensen, P. (2005). DNA integrity in sexed bull sperm assessed by neutral comet assay and sperm chromatin structure assay. Theriogenology, 63: 1789–1802.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.08.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carvalho J.O., Sartoric R., Machadoa G.M., Mourãoc G.B., Dode M.A.N. (2010). Quality assessment of bovine cryo-preserved sperm after sexing by flow cytometry and their use in in vitro embryo production. Theriogenology, 74: 1521–1530.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.06.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chamberland A., Fournier V., Tardif S., Sirard M.A., Sullivan R., Bailey J.L. (2001). The effect of heparin on motility parameters and protein phosphorylation during bovine sperm capacitation. Theriogenology, 55: 823–835.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00446-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christensen P., Labouriau R., Birck A., Boe-Hansen G.B., Pedersen J., Borchersen S. (2011). Relationship among seminal quality measures and field fertility of young dairy bulls using low-dose inseminations. J. Dairy Sci., 94: 1744–1754.10.3168/jds.2010-3087
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeJarnette J.M., McCleary C.R., Leach M.A., Moreno J.F., Nebel R.L., Marshall C.E. (2010). Effects of 2.1 and 3.5 × 106 sex-sorted sperm dosages on conception rates of Holstein cows and heifers. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 4079–4085.10.3168/jds.2010-3181
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeJarnette J.M., Leach M.A., Nebel R.L., Marshall C.E., McCleary C.R., Moreno J.F. (2011). Effects of sex sorting and sperm dosage on conception rates in Holstein heifers. Is comparable fertility of sex-sorted and conventional semen plausible? J. Dairy Sci., 94: 3477–3483.10.3168/jds.2011-4214
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evenson D., Jost L. (2000). Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Methods Cell Sci., 22: 169–189.10.1023/A:1009844109023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farrell P.R., Presicce G.A., Brockett C.C., Foote R.H. (1998). Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Theriogenology, 49: 871–879.10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00036-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frijters A.C., Mullaart E., Roelofs R.M., van Hoorne R.P., Moreno J.F., Moreno O., Merton J.S. (2009). What affects fertility of sexed bull semen more, low sperm dosage or the sorting process? Theriogenology, 71: 64–67.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.02519004486
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garner D.L. (2006). Flow cytometric sexing of mammalian sperm. Theriogenology, 65: 943–957.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gillan L., Kroetsch T., Chis Maxwell W.M., Evans G. (2008). Assessment of in vitro sperm characteristics in relation to fertility in dairy bulls. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 103: 201–214.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.12.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gogol P., Trzcińska M. (2020). Cell membrane integrity and sperm chromatin structure of sexed and unsexed bull semen (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk Zoot., 47: 235–244.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ho H.C., Suarez S.S. (2001). Hyperactivation of mammalian spermatozoa: function and regulation. Reproduction, 122: 519–526.10.1530/rep.0.1220519
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holden S.A., Fernandez-Fuertes B., Murphy C., Whelan H., O’Gorman A., Brennan L., Butler S.T., Lonergan P., Fair S. (2017). Relationship between in vitro sperm functional assessments, seminal plasma composition, and field fertility after AI with either non-sorted or sex-sorted bull semen. Theriogenology, 87: 221–228.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.08.024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hollinshead F.K., O’brien J.K., Maxwell W.M.C., Evans G. (2004). Assessment of in vitro sperm characteristics after flow cytometric sorting of frozen-thawed bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 62: 958–968.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.12.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ishijima S., Baba S.A., Mohri H., Suarez S.S. (2002). Quantitative analysis of flagellar movement in hyperactivated and acrosome-reacted golden hamster spermatozoa. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 61: 376–384.10.1002/mrd.10017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson L.A. (2000). Sexing mammalian sperm for production of offspring: the state of the art. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 60–61: 93–107.10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00088-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kumar P., Mohanty T.K., Kumaresan A., Nag P., Saraf K.K., Kumar V., Lathik S., Nayak S., Bhakat M. (2018). Incubation of spermatozoa with Anandamide prior to cryopreservation reduces cryocapacitation and improves post-thaw sperm quality in the water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Anim. Reprod. Sci., 189: 77–83.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.12.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lenz R.W., Gonzalez-Marin C., Gilligan T.B., DeJarnette J.M., Utt M.D., Helser L.A., Hasenpusch E., Evans K.M., Moreno J.F., Vishwanath R. (2016). SexedULTRATM, a new method of processing sex–sorted bovine sperm improves conception rates. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 29: 203–204.10.1071/RDv29n1Ab190
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maicas C., Hutchinson I.A., Kenneally J., Grant J., Cromie A.R., Lonergan P., Butler S.T. (2019). Fertility of fresh and frozen sex-sorted semen in dairy cows and heifers in seasonal-calving pasture-based herds. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 10530–10542.10.3168/jds.2019-16740
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maicas C., Holden S.A., Drake E., Cromie A.R., Lonergan P., Butler S.T. (2020). Fertility of frozen sex-sorted sperm at 4 × 106 sperm per dose in lactating dairy cows in seasonal-calving pasture-based herds. J. Dairy Sci., 103: 929–939.10.3168/jds.2019-17131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mocé E., Graham J.K., Schenk J.L. (2006). Effect of sex-sorting on the ability of fresh and cryopreserved bull sperm to undergo an acrosome reaction. Theriogenology, 66: 929–936.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.01.063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morrell J.M., Nongbua T., Valeanu S., Verde I.L., Lundstedt-Enkel K., Edman A., Johannisson A. (2017). Sperm quality variables as indicators of bull fertility may be breed dependent. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 185: 42–52.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.08.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oikawa K., Yamazaki T., Yamaguchi S., Abe H., Bai H., Takahashi M., Kawahara M. (2019). Effects of use of conventional and sexed semen on the conception rate in heifers: A comparison study. Theriogenology, 135: 33–37.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.06.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oliveira L.Z., de Arruda R.P., de Andrade A.F., Celeghini E.C., Reeb P.D., Martins J.P. (2013). Assessment of in vitro sperm characteristics and their importance in the prediction of conception rate in a bovine timed-AI program. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 137: 145–155.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.01.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips N., Mcgowan M., Johnston S., Mayer D. (2004). Relationship between thirty post-thaw spermatozoal characteristics and the field fertility of 11 high-use Australian dairy AI sires. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 81: 47–61.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.10.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rabidas S.K., Talukder A.K., Alam M.G.S., Bari F.Y. (2012). Relationship between semen quality parameters and field fertility of bulls. J. Emb. Trans., 27: 21–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reese S., Pirez M.C., Steele H., Kölle S. (2021). The reproductive success of bovine sperm after sex-sorting: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep., 11: 17366.10.1038/s41598-021-96834-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rybak R., Faldikova L., Faldyna M., Machatkova M., Rubes J. (2004). Bull and boar sperm DNA integrity evaluated by sperm chromatin structure assay in the Czech Republic. Vet. Med. Czech, 49: 1–8.10.17221/5668-VETMED
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sailer B.L., Jost L.K., Evenson D.P. (1996). Bull sperm head morphometry related to abnormal chromatin structure and fertility. Cytometry, 24: 167–173.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19960601)24:2<167::AID-CYTO9>3.0.CO;2-G
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schenk J.L., Cran D.G., Everestt R.W., Seidel G.E. Jr. (2009). Pregnancy rates in heifers and cows with cryopreserved sexed sperm: Effects of sperm numbers per inseminated, sorting pressure and sperm storage before sorting. Theriogenology, 71: 717–728.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.08.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seidel G.E. Jr. (2012). Sexing mammalian sperm – where do we go from here? J. Reprod. Dev., 58: 505–509.10.1262/jrd.2012-077
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seidel G.E. Jr. (2014). Update on sexed semen technology in cattle. Animal, 8 (Suppl. 1): 160–164.10.1017/S1751731114000202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sellem E., Broekhuijse M.L.W.J., Chevrier L., Camugli S., Schmitt E., Schibler L., Koenen E.P.C. (2015). Use of combinations of in vitro quality assessments to predict fertility of bovine semen. Theriogenology, 84: 1447–1454.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.035
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singh V.K., Kumar R., Atreja S.K. (2014). Cryo-survival, cryo-capacitation and oxidative stress assessment of buffalo spermatozoa cryopreserved in new soya milk extender. Livest. Sci., 160: 214–218.10.1016/j.livsci.2013.12.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stauss C.R., Votta T.J., Suarez S.S. (1995). Sperm motility hyperactivation facilitates penetration of the hamster zona pellucida. Biol. Reprod., 53: 1280–1285.10.1095/biolreprod53.6.1280
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suh T.K., Schenk J.L., Seidel G.E. Jr. (2005). High pressure flow cytometric sorting damages sperm. Theriogenology, 64: 1035–1048.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szczęśniak-Fabiańczyk B., Gogol P., Gajda L., Smorąg Z. (2021). Application of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) to improve cryopreservation of young bull semen. Ann. Anim. Sci., 21: 1367–1375.10.2478/aoas-2021-0059
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trzcińska M., Bryła M., Gajda B., Gogol P. (2015). Fertility of boar semen cryopreserved in extender supplemented with butylated hydroxytoluene. Theriogenology, 83: 307–313.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.07.045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner R.M. (2003). Tales from the tail: what do we really know about sperm motility? J. Androl., 24: 790–803.10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb03123.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vishwanath R., Moreno J. F. (2018). Review: Semen sexing – current state of the art with emphasis on bovine species. Animal, 12: 85–96.10.1017/S1751731118000496
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ward F., Rizos D., Corridan D., Quinn K., Boland M., Lonergan P. (2001). Paternal influence on the time of first embryonic cleavage post insemination and the implications for subsequent bovine embryo development in vitro and fertility in vivo. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 60: 47–55.10.1002/mrd.1060
]Search in Google Scholar