[Ahearne M., Yang Y., El Haj A. J., Then K. Y., Liu K. -K. (2005). Characterizing the viscoelastic properties of thin hydrogel-based constructs for tissue engineering applications. J. Royal Soc. Interface, 2: 455–463.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alhaque S., Themis M., Rashidi H. (2018). Three-dimensional cell culture: From evolution to revolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 373: 1750.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ardalani H., Sengupta S., Harms V., Vickerman V., Thomson J. A., Murphy W. L. (2019). 3-D culture and endothelial cells improve maturity of human pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes. Acta Biomater., 95: 371–381.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bartosh T. J., Ylostalo J. H. (2019). Efficacy of 3D culture priming is maintained in human mesenchymal stem cells after extensive expansion of the cells. Cells, 8: 9–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blondel D., Lutolf M. P. (2019). Bioinspired hydrogels for 3D organoid culture. Chimia, 73: 81–85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bodgi L., Bahmad H. F., Araji T., Al Choboq J., Bou-Gharios J., Cheaito K., Zeidan Y. H., Eid T., Geara F., Abou-Kheir W. (2019). Assessing radiosensitivity of bladder cancer in vitro: A 2D vs. 3D approach. Front. Oncol., 9: 1–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brevini T. A. L., Pennarossa G., Gandolfi F. (2020). A 3D approach to reproduction. Theriogenology, 150: 2–7.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brittain H. K., Scott R., Thomas E. (2017). The rise of the genome and personalised medicine. Clin. Med., 17: 545–551.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cannon T. M., Shah A. T., Skala M. C. (2017). Autofluorescence imaging captures heterogeneous drug response differences between 2D and 3D breast cancer cultures. Biomed. Opt. Exp., 8: 1911.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carter K., Lee H. J., Na K. S., Fernandes-Cunha G. M., Blanco I. J., Djalilian A., Myung D. (2019). Characterizing the impact of 2D and 3D culture conditions on the therapeutic effects of human mesenchymal stem cell secretome on corneal wound healing in vitro and ex vivo. Acta Biomater., 99: 247–257.]Search in Google Scholar
[Castiaux A. D., Spence D. M., Martin R. S. (2019). Review of 3D cell culture with analysis in microfluidic systems. Analyt. Met., 11: 4220–4232.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chaicharoenaudomrung N., Kunhorm P., Noisa P. (2019). Three-dimensional cell culture systems as an in vitro platform for cancer and stem cell modeling. World J. Stem Cell., 11: 1065–1083.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chaudhuri O. (2017). Viscoelastic hydrogels for 3D cell culture. Biomater. Sci., 5: 1480–1490.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corrò C., Novellasdemunt L., Li V. S. W. (2020). A brief history of organoids. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol., 319: C151–C165.]Search in Google Scholar
[Czerner M., Fellay L. S., Suárez M. P., Frontini P. M., Fasce L. A. (2015). Determination of elastic modulus of gelatin gels by indentation experiments. Proc. Mat. Sci., 8: 287–296.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dong Y., Jin G., Hong Y., Zhu H., Lu T., Xu F., Bai D., Lin M. (2018). Engineering the cell microenvironment using novel photoresponsive hydrogels. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfac., 10: 12374–12389.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dutta D., Heo I., Clevers H. (2017). Disease modeling in stem cell-derived 3d organoid systems. Trends Mol. Med., 20: 1–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Duval K., Grover H., Han L. -H., Mou Y., Pegoraro A. F., Fredberg J., Chen Z. (2017). Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiology, 32: 266–277.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fang Y., Eglen R. M. (2017). Three-dimensional cell cultures in drug discovery and development. SLAS Discov., 22: 456–472.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fiorentzis M., Katopodis P., Kalirai H., Seitz B., Viestenz A., Coupland S. E. (2019). Conjunctival melanoma and electrochemotherapy: preliminary results using 2D and 3D cell culture models in vitro. Acta Ophthalmol., 97: e632–e640.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fontoura J. C., Viezzer C., dos Santos F. G., Ligabue R. A., Weinlich R., Puga R. D., Antonow D., Severino P., Bonorino C. (2020). Comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models for cell growth, gene expression and drug resistance. Mat. Sci. Eng. C, 107: 110264.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerlach G., Arndt K. (2013). Hydrogel sensors and actuators volume. Springer Ser. Chem. Sens. Biosens., 1–272.]Search in Google Scholar
[Godoy P., Hewitt N. J., Albrecht U., Andersen M. E., Ansari N., Bhattacharya S., Bode J. G., Bolleyn J., Borner C., Böttger J., Braeuning A., Budinsky R. A., Burkhardt B., Cameron N. R., Camussi G., Cho C. -S., Choi Y. -J., Craig Rowlands J., Dahmen U., Hengstler J. G. (2013). Recent advances in 2D and 3D in vitro systems using primary hepatocytes, alternative hepatocyte sources and non-parenchymal liver cells and their use in investigating mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, cell signaling and ADME. Archiv. Toxicol., 87: 1315–1530.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goetz L. H., Schork N. J. (2019). Personalized medicine: motivation, challenges and progress. Fertil. Steril., 109: 952–963.]Search in Google Scholar
[Günther C., Brevini T., Sampaziotis F., Neurath M. F. (2019). What gastroenterologists and hepatologists should know about organoids in 2019. Digest. Liver Dis., 51: 753–760.]Search in Google Scholar
[He B., Chen G., Zeng Y. (2016). Three-dimensional cell culture models for investigating human viruses. Virol. Sin., 31: 363–379.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hori T., Kurosawa O. (2018). A three-dimensional cell culture method with a micromesh sheet and its application to hepatic cells. Tissue Eng. - Part C: Methods, 24: 730–739.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horman S. R., To J., Orth A. P. (2013). An HTS-compatible 3D colony formation assay to identify tumor-specific chemotherapeutics. J. Biomol. Screen., 18: 1298–1308.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang G., Li F., Zhao X., Ma Y., Li Y., Lin M., Jin G., Jian Lu T. M., Genin G., Xu F. (2019). Functional and biomimetic materials for engineering of the three-dimensional cell microenvironment. Chem. Rev., 117: 12764–12850.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ingeson-Carlsson C., Martinez-Monleon A., Nilsson M. (2015). Differential effects of MAPK pathway inhibitors on migration and invasiveness of BRAFV600E mutant thyroid cancer cells in 2D and 3D culture. Exp. Cell Res., 338: 127–135.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackson S. E., Chester J. D. (2015). Personalised cancer medicine. Int. J. Cancer, 137: 262–266.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jain V., Haider N., Jain K. (2018). 3D printing in personalized drug delivery. Curr. Pharm. Des., 24: 5062–5071.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen C., Teng Y. (2020). Is it time to start transitioning from 2D to 3D cell culture? Front. Mol. Biosci., 7: 1–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kapałczyńska M., Kolenda T., Przybyła W., Zajączkowska M., Teresiak A., Filas V., Ibbs M., Bli ź niak R., Łuczewski Ł., Lamperska K. (2018). 2D and 3D cell cultures – a comparison of different types of cancer cell cultures. Arch. Med. Sci., 14: 910–919.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee D., Zhang H., Ryu S. (2019 a). Elastic modulus measurement of hydrogels. Cellulose-Based Superabsorbent Hydrogels, pp. 865–884.10.1007/978-3-319-77830-3_60]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee J. E., Lee J., Kim J. H., Cho N., Lee S. H., Park S. B., Koh B., Kang D., Kim S., Yoo H. M. (2019 b). Characterization of the anti-cancer activity of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus fermentum using 2D vs. 3D culture in colorectal cancer cells. Biomolecules, 9: 557.10.3390/biom9100557684322331581581]Search in Google Scholar
[Mabry K. M., Payne S. Z., Anseth K. S. (2016). Microarray analyses to quantify advantages of 2D and 3D hydrogel culture systems in maintaining the native valvular interstitial cell phenotype. Biomaterials, 74: 31–41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Muniz E. C., Geuskens G. (2001). Compressive elastic modulus of polyacrylamide hydrogels and semi-IPNs with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). Macromolecules, 34: 4480–4484.]Search in Google Scholar
[Othman A., Ehnert S., Dropmann A., Ruoß M., Nüssler A. K., Hammad S. (2020). Precision-cut liver slices as an alternative method for long-term hepatotoxicity studies. Archiv. Toxicol., 94: 2889–2891.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pogoda K. (2015). Rola sił mechanicznych generowanych przez macierz zewnątrzkomórkową w roz woju raka prostaty (in Polish). Docthoral Thesis, The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, 1–123.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ravi M., Ramesh A., Pattabhi A. (2017). Contributions of 3D cell cultures for cancer research. J. Cell. Physiol., 232: 2679–2697.]Search in Google Scholar
[Riedl A., Schlederer M., Pudelko K., Stadler M., Walter S., Unterleuthner D., Unger C., Kramer N., Hengstschläger M., Kenner L., Pfeiffer D., Krupitza G., Dolznig H. (2017). Comparison of cancer cells in 2D vs 3D culture reveals differences in AKT-mTOR-S6K signaling and drug responses. J. Cell Sci., 130: 203–218.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryu N. E., Lee S. H., Park H. (2019). Spheroid culture system methods and applications for mesenchymal stem cells. Cells, 8: 1–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sapudom J., Alatoom A., Mohamed W. K. E., Garcia-Sabaté A., Mc Bain I., Nasser R. A., Teo J. C. M. (2020). Dendritic cell immune potency on 2D and in 3D collagen matrices. Biomater. Sci. 8: 5106–5120.]Search in Google Scholar
[Souza A. G., Silva I. B. B., Campos-Fernandez E., Barcelos L. S., Souza J. B., Marangoni K., Goulart L. R., Alonso-Goulart V. (2018). Comparative assay of 2D and 3D cell culture models: proliferation, gene expression and anticancer drug response. Curr. Pharmac. Design, 24: 1689–1694.]Search in Google Scholar
[Štampar M., Tomc J., Filipič M., Ž egura B. (2019). Development of in vitro 3D cell model from hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cell line and its application for genotoxicity testing. Archiv. Toxicol., 93: 3321–3333.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tatara T., Mukohara T., Tanaka R., Shimono Y., Funakoshi Y., Imamura Y., Toyoda M., Kiyota N., Hirai M., Kakeji Y., Minami H. (2018). 3D culture represents apoptosis induced by trastuzumab better than 2D monolayer culture. Anticancer Res., 38: 2831–2839.]Search in Google Scholar
[Terrell J. A., Jones C. G., Kabandana G. K. M., Chen C. (2020). From cells-on-a-chip to organs-on-a-chip: scaffolding materials for 3D cell culture in microfluidics. J. Mat. Chem. B, 8: 6667–6685.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torras N., García-Díaz M., Fernández-Majada V., Martínez E. (2018). Mimicking epithelial tissues in three-dimensional cell culture models. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 6: 197.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trenfield S. J., Awad A., Madla C. M., Hatton G. B., Goyanes A., Gaisford S., Basit A. W., Trenfield S. J., Awad A., Madla C. M., Hatton G. B. (2019). Expert opinion on drug delivery shaping the future: recent advances of 3D printing in drug delivery and healthcare. Exp. Opin. Drug Deliv., 16: 1–14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verjans E. -T., Doijen J., Luyten W., Landuyt B., Schoofs L. (2018). Three-dimensional cell culture models for anticancer drug screening: Worth the effort? J. Cell. Physiol., 233: 2993–3003.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wyle ż oł M., Ostrowska B., Wróbel E. (2016). Inżynieria biomedyczna. Metody przyrostowe w technice medycznej (in Polish). Politechnika Lubelska.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xiang C., Du Y., Meng G., Yi L. S., Sun S., Song N., Zhang X., Xiao Y., Jie Wan J., Yi Z., Liu Y., Xie B., Wu M., Shu J., Sun D., Jia J., Liang Z., Sun D., Huang Y., Deng H. (2019). Long-term functional maintenance of primary human hepatocytes in vitro. Science, 364: 399–402.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xing J., Luo Y., Zhan J., Kang Z. (2018). Global shape optimization of fixtures to suppress wrinkles in large-displacement membrane structures. Int. J. Solids Struct., 144–145: 301–312.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang S., Buttler-Buecher P., Denecke B., Arana-Chavez V. E., Apel C. (2018). A comprehensive analysis of human dental pulp cell spheroids in a three-dimensional pellet culture system. Archiv. Oral Biol., 91: 1–8.]Search in Google Scholar
