[Ahlstrøm Ø., Skrede A., Shearer K. (2008). Perspectives on traditional and alternative feed ingredients in future fur animal production. Scientifur, 32: 116–122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Axelsson H.M.K., Aldén E., Lidfors L. (2009). Behaviour in female mink housed in enriched standard cages during winter. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 121: 222–229.]Search in Google Scholar
[Axelsson H.M.K., Hansen S.W., Loberg J., Lidfors L. (2017). Effects of group size on behaviour, growth and occurrence of bite marks in farmed mink. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 194: 112–119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baekgaard H., Larsen P.F., Sønderup M. (2008). Female body condition and early kit mortality: A description from practice. Scientifur, 32: 18–19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Belyaev D.K., Trapezov O.V. (1986). The relationship of selection for behaviour with reproduction in American mink. Zh. Obshch. Biol., 47: 445–450.]Search in Google Scholar
[Birch J.M., Agger J.F., Dahlin C., Jensen V.F., Hammer A.S., Struve T., Jensen H.E. (2017). Risk factors associated with diarrhea in Danish commercial mink (Neovison vison) during the pre-weaning period. Scientifur, 41: 76–78.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bis-Wencel H. (2006). The diet effect on the indices of female minks reproduction (in Polish). Acta Sci. Pol., Medicina Veterinaria, 5: 103–110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blomstedt L. (1989). Histological determination of different stages of pelage development, fur growth of mink. Acta Agric. Scand., 39: 91–99.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boudreau L., Benkel B., Astatkie T., Rouvinen-Watt K. (2014). Ideal body condition improves reproductive performance and influences genetic health in female mink. Anim. Reprod. Sci, 145: 86–98.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brink A.L., Jeppesen L.L. (2005). Behaviour of mink kits and dams (Mustela vison) in the lactation period. CJAS, 85: 7–12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell D.L.M., Link J.E., Lester-Saenz A.H., Bursian S.J. (2016). Feed intake, growth, and behavioral assessment of mink fed a clam-based diet. CJAS, 96: 11–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cao X., Wei H., Xue H., Li X., Zhao W., Xu C., Wang S., Diao Y., Rose J., Xu B. (2016). Fecal progestin concentrations as an indicator of reproductive success in American mink. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 165: 11–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christiansen M.L.E., Lassén T.M. (2008). Processing of animal by-products used in feed for fur animals – effect on nutritional value and hygienic quality. Scientifur, 32: 123–127.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clausen T.N., Hammer A.S. (2008). Placental scars in barren mink females. Scientifur, 32: 32–33,]Search in Google Scholar
[Concannon P., Pilbeam T., Travis H. (1980). Advanced implantation in mink (Mustela vison) treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate during early embryonic diapause. J. Reprod. Fertil., 58: 1–6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Damgaard B.M., Hansen S.W., Børsting C.F., Møller S.H. (2004). Effects of different feeding strategies during the winter period on behaviour and performance in mink females (Mustela vison). App. Anim. Behav. Sci., 89: 163–180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Damgaard B.M., Dalgaard T.S., Larsen T., Hedemann M.S., Hansen S.W. (2012). The effects of feed restriction on physical activity, body weight, physiology, haematology and immunology in female mink. Res. Vet. Sci., 93: 936–942.]Search in Google Scholar
[Díez-León M., Quinton M., Mason G. (2017). How tall should a mink cage be? Using animals’ preferences for different ceiling heights to improve cage design. App. Anim. Behav. Sci., 192: 24–34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dziadosz M., Seremak B., Lasota B., Masłowska A., Mieleńczuk G. (2010). Analysis in some reproduction traits of female mink (Neovison vison) depending on the colour varieties and age. Acta Sci. Pol., Zootech., 9: 71–80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Enders R.K. (1949). Multiple ovulation in mink breeding. Am. Fur Breeder, 21: 6–8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Felska-Błaszczyk L., Sulik M., Panknin A. (2010). The incidence of barren females of mink (Mustela vison) of various colour types in relation to systems and dates of mating (in Polish). Acta Sci. Pol., Zootech., 9: 81–92.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fink R., Tauson A.H. (1998). Flushing of mink (Mustela vison): effects on energy metabolism and some blood metabolites. Anim. Sci., 66: 277–284.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fink R., Tauson A.H., Chwalibog A., Kristensen N.B., Wamberg S. (2004). Effects of substitution of dietary protein with carbohydrate on the lactation performance in the female mink (Mustela vison). J. Anim. Feed Sci., 13: 647–664.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gugołek A., Zalewski D., Strychalski J., Konstantynowicz M. (2013). Food transit time, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention in farmed and feral American mink (Neovison vison) – a comparative analysis. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 97: 1030–1035.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hänninen S., Mononen J., Harjunpää S., Pyykönen T., Sepponen J., Ahola L. (2008). Effects of family housing on some behavioural and physiological parameters of juvenile farmed mink (Mustela vison). App. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109: 384–395.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen S.W., Jeppesen L.L. (2006). Temperament, stereotypies and anticipatory behaviour as measures of welfare in mink. App. Anim. Behav. Sci., 99: 172–182.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen B.K., Berg P. (2008 a). Reduced litter size and percent kits alive is a consequence of selecting for high body weight. Scientifur, 32: 16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen B.K., Berg P. (2008 b). Genetics of early kit growth and maternal weight changes during pregnancy and lactation in mink. Scientifur. 32: 24–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen B.K., Berg P., Larsen P.F. (2008). Heterosis in mink. Scientifur, 32: 77b–77c.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen S.W., Møller S.H., Damgaard B.M. (2014). Bite marks in mink – induced experimentally and as reflection of aggressive encounters between mink. App. Anim. Behav. Sci., 158: 76–85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Henriksen B.I.F., Anneberg I., Sørensen J.T., Møller S.H. (2015). Farmers’ perception of stable schools as a tool to improve management for the benefit of mink welfare. Livest. Sci., 181: 7–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horecka B., Jeżewska-Witkowska G., Kasperek K., Jakubczak A., Ślaska B., Bugno-Poniewierska M., Piórkowska M. (2012). Genetic structure of wild and farmbred American mink (Neovison vison). Proc. XXV International Conference Genetic Days. Book of Abstracts. 18–20.09.2012, Wrocław, Poland, p. 65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Houbak B., Malmkvist J. (2008). Observations of deliveries in mink: Potential for more kits. Scientifur, 32: 34–35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hunter D.B. (2008). Review of factors associated with mink kit mortality. Scientifur, 32: 28–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen V.F., Sommer H.M., Struve T., Clausen J., Chriél M. (2016). Factors associated with usage of antimicrobials in commercial mink (Neovison vison) production in Denmark. Prev. Vet. Med., 126: 170–182.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen V.F., Sommer H.M., Struve T., Clausen J., Chriél M. (2017). A cross-sectional field study on potential associations between feed quality measures and usage of antimicrobials in commercial mink (Neovison vison). Prev. Vet. Med., 143: 54–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiang Q., Li G., Zhang T., Zhang K., Gao X., Xing Y., Zhao J., Yang F. (2015). Effects of dietary protein level on nutrients digestibility and reproductive performance of female mink (Neovison vison) during gestation. Anim. Nutr., 1: 65–69.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiang Q., Li G., Zhang T., Zhang K., Gao X., Xing Y., Yang F. (2018). Application of formulated diets and their effects on nutrient digestibility and reproductive performance of females mink (Neovison vison) during gestation. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 46: 125–129.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johansson I., Venge O. (1952). Relation of the mating interval to the occurrence of superfetation in the mink. Acta Zool., 32: 255–258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kemp B., Martens R.P.C.H., Hazeleger W., Soede N.M., Noordhuisen J.P.T.M. (1993). The effect of different feeding levels during pregnancy on subsequent breeding results in mink (Mustela vison). J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 69: 115–119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koivula M., Strandén I., Mäntysaari E.A. (2008). Genetic parameters for litter size and grading traits in Finnish mink population. Scientifur, 32: 51–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kołodziejczyk D., Socha S. (2008). Analysis of conformation traits in mink of standard and palomino colour types. Scientifur, 32: 59–62.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kołodziejczyk D., Socha S. (2012). Mink fertility of palomino colour type and its crossbreeds with different percentages of standard mink genes. Acta Sci. Pol., Zootech., 11: 53–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korhonen H., Niemelä P. (1998). Effect of ad libitum and restrictive feeding on seasonal weight changes in captive minks (Mustela vison). J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 79: 269–280.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korhonen H.T., Jauhiainen L., Rekilä T. (2002). Effect of temperament and behavioural reactions to the presence of a human during the pre-mating period on reproductive performance in farmed mink (Mustela vison). CJAS, 82: 275–282.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lagerkvist G., Johansson K., Lundeheim N. (1993). Selection for litter size, body weight and pelt quality in mink (Mustela vison): experimental design and direct response of each trait. J. Anim. Sci., 71: 3261–3271.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lagerkvist G., Johansson K., Lundeheim N. (1994). Selection for litter size, body weight, and pelt quality in mink (Mustela vison): correlated responses. J. Anim. Sci., 72: 1126–1137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lagerkvist G. (1997). Economic profit from increased litter size, body weight and pelt quality in mink (Mustela vison). Acta Agr. Scand. A-An., 47: 57–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maciejowski J., Jeżewska G. (1993). Genetics of reproduction traits of fur animals (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod., 12: 5–12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Malmkvist J., Hansen S.W. (2001). The welfare of farmed mink (Mustela vison) in relation to behavioural selection: a review. Anim. Welf., 10: 41–52.]Search in Google Scholar
[Malmkvist J., Gade M., Damm B.I. (2007). Parturient behaviour in farmed mink (Mustela vison) in relation to early kit mortality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 107: 120–132.]Search in Google Scholar
[Malmkvist J., Sørensen D.D., Larsen T., Palme R., Hansen S.W. (2016). Weaning and separation stress: maternal motivation decreases with litter age and litter size in farmed mink. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 181: 152–159.]Search in Google Scholar
[Malmkvist J., Schou T.M. (2017). Year-round use of straw in farm mink. Scientifur, 41: 92.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin P. (1984). The meaning of weaning. Anim. Behav., 32: 1257–1258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mason G., Mendl M. (1997). Do the stereotypies of pigs, chickens and mink reflect adaptive species differences in the control of foraging? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 53: 45–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matthiesen C.F., Blache D., Thomsen P.D., Tauson A.H. (2010). Feeding mink (Neovison vison) a protein restricted diet during pregnancy induces higher birth weight and altered hepatic gene expression in the F2 offspring. Br. J. Nutr., 104: 544–553.]Search in Google Scholar
[Møller S.H. (2008 a). Development of mammary glands in mink. Scientifur, 32: 22–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Møller S.H. (2008 b). Feeding during gestation in relation to litter size in mink. Scientifur, 32: 20–21. M u r p h y B.D. (1979). Effects of GnRH on plasma LH and fertility in mink. CJAS, 59: 25–33.10.4141/cjas79-003]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy B.D., James D.A. (1974). The effects of light and sympathetic innervation to the head on nidation in mink. J. Exp. Zool., 187: 267–276.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mustonen A.M., Pyykönen T., Paakkonen T., Ryökkynen A., Asikainen J., Aho J., Mononen J., Nieminen P. (2005 a). Adaptations to fasting in the American mink (Mustela vison): Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 140: 195–202.10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.12.00415748859]Search in Google Scholar
[Mustonen A.M., Saarela S., Pyykonen T., Nieminen P. (2005 b). Endocrinologic adaptations to wintertime fasting in the male American mink (Mustela vison). Exp. Biol. Med., 230: 612–620.10.1177/15353702052300090316179729]Search in Google Scholar
[Papuc C., Goran G.C., Predescu C.N., Nicorescu V. (2017). Mechanisms of oxidative processes in meat and toxicity induced by postprandial degradation products: a review. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 16: 96–123.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pedersen V., Jeppesen L.L., Jeppesen N. (2004). Effects of group housing systems on behaviour and production performance in farmed juvenile mink (Mustela vison). App. J. Anim. Behav. Sci., 88: 89–100.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piórkowska M., Kowalska D. (2014). Characteristics of farmed and wild populations of American mink (in Polish). Wiad. Zoot., 2: 122–129.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pölönen I., Koenem H., Sønderup M. (2004). A systematic approach to sustainable fur farming with special reference to feed and feeding. Scientifur, 28: 96–99.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rouvinen-Watt K., Hynes A.M. (2004). Mink nursing sickness survey in North America. Scientifur, 28: 71–77.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rozempolska-Rucińska I. (2004). Genetic background of performance and functional traits in mink. EJPAU, www.ejpau.media.pl/series/volume7/issue2/animal/art-03.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Schackelford R.M. (1952). Superfetation in the ranch mink. Am. Natur., 86: 311–319.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider R.R., Hunter D.B. (1992). Nursing disease in mink. Scientifur, 16: 239–242.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider R.R., Hunter D.B., Waltner-Toews D. (1992). Nursing disease in mink: ranchlevel epidemiology. Prev. Vet. Med., 14: 181–194.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider R.R., Hunter D.B. (1993). A survey of the causes of mortality in adult mink, with emphasis on the lactation period. Can. Vet. J., 34: 103–108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seremak B., Dziadosz M., Felska-Błaszczyk L., Lasota B., Pławski K., Masłowska A. (2011). A novel arrangement of breeding sets has a positive effects on some reproductive parameters in females of the American mink (Neovison vison). Acta Sci. Pol. Zootech., 10: 105–114.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seremak B., Dziadosz M., Lasota B., Felska-Błaszczyk L., Pławski K., Masłowska A., Mieleńczuk G. (2011). Effect of the quality of handling and care on the reproduction parameters of mink. Acta Sci. Pol., Zootech., 10: 93–102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seremak B., Felska-Błaszczyk L., Dworecka M., Dziadosz-Styś M., Lasota B. (2013). Analysis of litter sizes at birth and at 7 days of nursing in mink (Neovison vison) of Black Velvet, Hedlund White, and Silverblue color types. Acta Sci. Pol., Zootech., 12: 39–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seremak B., Felska-Błaszczyk L., Pławski K., Opieka P., Wojciechowska A. (2016). Selected reproductive parameters of female American mink (Neovison vison) of different colour variants (in Polish). Wiad. Zoot., 2: 43–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Socha S., Kołodziejczyk D. (2006). Analysis of factors affecting fertility in standard and palomino mink (in Polish). Ann. UMCS, Sectio EE, 24: 403–408.]Search in Google Scholar
[Socha S., Markiewicz D., Wojewódzka A. (2003). Selected reproductive parameters of female American mink (Neovison vison) of different colour variants (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod., 68, 6: 79–86.]Search in Google Scholar
[Socha S., Markiewicz D. (2002). Effect of mating and whelping dates on the number of pups in mink. EJPAU, Anim. Husb., 5: http://www.ejpau.media.pl]Search in Google Scholar
[Sulik M., Felska-Blaszczyk L., Zołedziejewska J., Semik A. (2008). Analysis of reproduction performance under different mating systems in Sapphire and Wild mink. Scientifur, 32: 100–105.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sundqvist C., Amador A.G., Bartke A. (1989). Reproduction fertility (Mustela vison). J. Reprod. Fertil., 85: 413–441.]Search in Google Scholar
[Svendsen P.M., Hansen B.K., Malmkvist J., Hansen S.W., Palme R., Jeppesen L.L. (2007). Selection against stereotypic behaviour may have contradictory consequences for the welfare of farm mink (Mustela vison). App. Anim. Behav. Sci., 107: 110–119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ślaska B., Rozempolska-Rucińska I., Jeżewska-Witkowska G. (2009). Variation in some reproductive traits of mink (Neovison vison) according to their coat colour. Ann. Anim. Sci., 9: 287–297.]Search in Google Scholar
[Święcicka N., Bernacka H., Zawiślak J. (2016). Reproductive results of mink of different colour types on farms under performance recording and breeding value estimation in the years 1999–2013 (in Polish). Wiad. Zoot., 1: 61–67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Święcicka N. (2013). Influence of the air temperature and relative air humidity on the parameters of the reproduction of Scanbrown minks. JCEA, 14: 407–419.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taraska M., Sulik M., Lasota B. (2016). Comparison of the craniometric parameters of wild and farm American mink (Mustela vison). Folia Morphol., 75: 251–256.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tauson A.H. (1988). Flushing of mink. Effects of level of preceding feed restriction and length of flushing period on reproductive performance. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 17: 243–250.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tauson A.H. (1993). Effect of body condition and dietary energy supply on reproductive processes in female mink (Mustela vison). J. Reprod. Fertil., 47(Suppl.): 37–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tauson A.H., Fink R., Forsberg M., Lagerkvist G., Wamberg S. (2000). LH release in mink (Mustela vison). Pattern of the LH surge and effect of metabolic status. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 40: 229–247.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thirstrup J.P., Ruiz-Gonzalez A., Pujolar J.M., Larsen P.F., Jensen J., Randi E., Zalewski A., Pertoldi C. (2015). Population genetic structure in farm and feral American mink (Neovison vison) inferred from RAD sequencing-generated single nucleotide polymorphisms. J. Anim. Sci., 93: 1–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trapezov O.V. (2008). Effects of domestication and new technological possibilities in breeding practice: American mink (Neovison vison Schreber, 1777) as a model. Scientifur, 32: 63–68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wierzbicki H. (2005). Breeding value evaluation in Polish fur animals: Factors affecting pelt prices in the international trading system. CJAS, 50: 266–272.]Search in Google Scholar
