Diabetes Risk Profile for an Argeş County Adult Sample – Findrisc Score Characteristics

1. Farhud DD. Impact of lifestyle on health, Iran I Public Health. 2015;44(11):1442-1444.Search in Google Scholar

2. Wilding S, Conner M, et al. Using the question-behavior effect to change multiple health behaviors: an exploratory randomized controlled trial, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2019;81:53-60.Search in Google Scholar

3. Sygit KM, Sygyt M, et al. Physical activity as an important element in organizing and managing the lifestyle of populations in urban and rural environments, Ann Agric Environ Med. 2019;26(1):8-12.Search in Google Scholar

4. Pinto Pereira SM, Li L, et al. Lifetime risk factors for leisure-time physical inactivity in mid-adulthood, Preventive Medicine Reports. 2018;11:23-30.Search in Google Scholar

5. Guthold R, Stevens AG, et al. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1,9 million participants, Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1077-86.10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7Search in Google Scholar

6. Wing RR, Goldstein MG, et al. Lifestyle changes related to obesity, eating behavior, and physical activity, Diabetes Care. 2001;24:117-123.Search in Google Scholar

7. Thivel D, Trembley A, et al. Physical activity, inactivity, and sedentary behaviors: definitions and implications in occupational health, Frontiers in Public Health. 2018;6(288).10.3389/fpubh.2018.00288618281330345266Search in Google Scholar

8. World Health Organization – Global report on diabetes, WHO Press, Geneva; 2016:1-87.Search in Google Scholar

9. World Health Organization – Classification of diabetes mellitus, WHO Press, Genev;, 2016:1-87.Search in Google Scholar

10. Guasch-Ferre′ M, Bullo′ M, et al. A Risk Score to Predict Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in an Elderly Spanish Mediterranean Population at High Cardiovascular Risk – PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e33437.10.1371/journal.pone.0033437330772722442692Search in Google Scholar

11. Selph S, Dana T, Blazina I, Bougatsos C, Patel H, Chou R. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 2015;162:765-776.Search in Google Scholar

12. Ali MK, Siegel KR, Chandrasekar E, et al. Disease control priorities (Cardiovascular, Respiratory and Related Disorders), 3rd edition, vol. 5, World Bank, Washington DC/USA; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

13. American Diabetes Association 2 - Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:S13-s27.10.2337/dc18-S00229222373Search in Google Scholar

14. Lindstrom J, Tuomilehto J. The diabetes risk score: a practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:725-731.10.2337/diacare.26.3.72512610029Search in Google Scholar

15. Schwarz PE, Li J, Lindstrom J, Tuomilehto J. - Tools for predicting the risk of type 2 diabetes in daily practice. Horm. Metab. Res. 2009;41:86-97.Search in Google Scholar

16. Saaristo L, Peltonen M, Lindstrom J, Saarikoski L, et al. Cross-sectional evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score: a tool to identify undetected type 2 diabetes, abnormal glucose tolerance and metabolic syndrome. Diab. Vasc. Dis. Res. 2005;2:67-72.Search in Google Scholar

17. Schwarz PE, Li J, Reimann M, Schutte AE, et al. The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score is associated with insulin resistance and progression towards type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;94:920-926.Search in Google Scholar

18. Zhang L, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Hu G, Chen L. Evaluation of Finnish Diabetes Risk Score in screening undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes among U.S. adults by gender and race: NHANES 1999-2010. PloS One. 2014;9.10.1371/journal.pone.0097865403112224852786Search in Google Scholar

19. Restian A. Stilul de viaţă ca factor pathogen, Practica Medicală. 2010;2(18):65-70.Search in Google Scholar

20. Yanping L, An P, et al. The impact of healthy lifestyle factors on life expactancies in the US population, Circulation. 2018;138(4):345-355.Search in Google Scholar

21. Sharps M, Robinson E. Encouraging children to eat more fruit and vegetables: health vs. descriptive social norm-based messages, Appetite. 2016;100:18-25.Search in Google Scholar

22. Jannasch F, Kroger J, et al. Generalizability of a diabetes-associated country-specific exploratory dietary pattern is feasible across European populations, J Nutr. 2019;149:1047-1055.Search in Google Scholar

23. Jannasch F, Schultze M, et al. Dietary patterns and type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and metanalysis of prospective studies, J Nutr. 2017;147:1174-82.Search in Google Scholar

24. Franciosi M, De Berardis G, Rossi MCE, Sacco M, at al. Use of the Diabetes Risk Score for opportunistic screening of undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. The IGLOO (Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Long-Term Outcomes Observational) study. Diabetes Care. 2015;28(5):1187-1194.10.2337/diacare.28.5.118715855587Search in Google Scholar

25. Balkau B, Lange C, Fezeu L, Tichet J, et al. Predicting diabetes: Clinical, biological, and genetic approaches. Data from the Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR). Diabetes Care. 2008;31(10):2056-2061.10.2337/dc08-0368255165418689695Search in Google Scholar

26. Cameron AJ, Magliano DJ, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, et al. - The metabolic syndrome as a tool for predicting future diabetes: the AusDiab study. J Intern Med. 2008;264:177-186.10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01935.x18298479Search in Google Scholar

27. Abdul-Ghani MA, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA. Contribution of β-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance to the pathogenesis of impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(5):1130-1139.10.2337/dc05-2179Search in Google Scholar

28. Makrilakis K, Liatis S, Grammatikou S, Perrea D, et al. - Validation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) questionnaire for screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes, dysglycaemia and the metabolic syndrome in Greece. Diabetes & Metabolism. 2011:37:144-151.10.1016/j.diabet.2010.09.00621144787Search in Google Scholar

29. Tankova T, Chakarova N, Atanassova I, Dakovska L. Evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score as a screening tool for impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance and undetected diabetes. Diab Research Clin Practice. 2011;92:46-52.10.1016/j.diabres.2010.12.02021242013Search in Google Scholar

30. Alssema M, Vistisen D, Heymans MW, et al. The evaluation of screening and early detection strategies for type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (DETECT-2) update of the Finnish diabetes risk score for prediction of incident type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2011;54:1004-1012.10.1007/s00125-010-1990-721153531Search in Google Scholar

31. Al-Shudifat AE, Al-Shadaifat A, et al. Diabetes risk score in a young student population in Jordan: a cross-sectional study – Journal of Diabetes research. 2017;ID:8290710.10.1155/2017/8290710542995928540309Search in Google Scholar

32. Kulkarni M, Foraker R, et al. Evaluation of the modified FINDRISC diabetes score to identify individuals at high risk for diabetes among middle-aged white and black ARIC study participants, Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(9):1260-1266.Search in Google Scholar

33. Moldobaeva MS, Vinogradova AV, et al. Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus development in the native population of low- and high-altitude regions of Kyrgyzstan: the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score Questionnaire results, High Alt Med Biol. 2017;18(4):428-435.Search in Google Scholar

34. Meijnikman A, Block C, et al. Predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus: a comparison between the FINDRISC score and the metabolic syndrome, Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2018;10:12.Search in Google Scholar

35. Bernabe-Ortiz A, Perel P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) for undiagnosed T2DM in Peruvian population – Primary Care Diabetes. 2018;12:517-525.Search in Google Scholar

36. Salinero-Fort MA, Burgos-Lunar C, et al. Performance of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score and a Simplified Finnish Diabetes Risk Score in a community-based, cross-sectional programme for screening of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and dysglycaemia in Madrid, Spain: The SPREDIA-2 Study – PLOS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0158489.10.1371/journal.pone.0158489495620827441722Search in Google Scholar

37. Shahim B, Gyberg V, et al. Undetected dysglycemia common in primary care patients treated for hypertension and/or dyslipidaemia: on the need for a screening strategy in clinical practice. A report from EUROASPIRE IV a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology, Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:21.Search in Google Scholar

38. Agarwal G, Guingona MM, et al. Choosing the most appropriate existing type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool for use in the Philippines: a case-control study with an urban Filipino population. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1169.10.1186/s12889-019-7402-0671287431455247Search in Google Scholar

39. Fizelova M, Jauhiainen, et al. Finnish Risk Score is associated with impaired insulin secretion and insulin sensivity, drug-treated hypertension and cardiovascular disease: a follow-up study of the METSIM cohort, PloS ONE. 2016;11(11):e0166584.10.1371/journal.pone.0166584511285827851812Search in Google Scholar

40. Gilis-Januszewska A, Lindstrom J, et al. Sustained diabetes risk reduction after real life and primary health care setting implementation of the diabetes using lifestyle, physical activity and nutritional intervention (DE-PLAN) project, BMC Public Health. 2017;17:198.Search in Google Scholar