The Construction and Application of Rural Teachers’ Educational Research Literacy Indicator System in the Context of Deep Learning

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Comprehensive model score coefficient and index weight value

Dimension	Index	Linear combination coefficient			Model integrated score coefficient	Index weight
		Scientific ability factor	Scientific awareness factor	Scientific moral factor
Scientific ability	Literature review capability	0.288	0.089	0.068	0.174	0.035
	To master the specific steps of education	0.283	0.089	0.062	0.167	0.036
	Inductive sum	0.289	0.083	0.032	0.158	0.039
	Ability to apply and promote results	0.286	0.107	0.078	0.175	0.040
	Data analysis ability	0.288	0.096	0.082	0.174	0.092
	Literature retrieval ability	0.284	0.093	0.075	0.173	0.035
	To master the basic theory of education	0.283	0.093	0.042	0.161	0.028
	The planning capacity of the research direction	0.281	0.108	0.098	0.185	0.038
	Methodology of education research	0.274	0.107	0.103	0.183	0.036
	Basic theory of pedagogy psychology	0.258	0.102	0.118	0.178	0.037
	Discipline theory and knowledge	0.249	0.087	0.118	0.166	0.037
Scientific awareness	The understanding of scientific research promotion teaching	0.055	0.336	0.131	0.16	0.044
	The understanding of scientific research and promotion of professional development	0.051	0.333	0.155	0.156	0.035
	Understanding the significance of scientific research	0.059	0.322	0.127	0.161	0.028
	Will of scientific research	0.107	0.318	0.093	0.166	0.036
	Interest in research	0.105	0.309	0.089	0.163	0.034
	Will be the will of the research teacher	0.125	0.305	0.054	0.164	0.052
	Ability to find problems	0.149	0.261	0.108	0.173	0.035
	Ability to provide new ideas	0.161	0.252	0.095	0.174	0.031
	Ability to reflect on teaching	0.138	0.252	0.141	0.169	0.035
Scientific ethics	Respect research objects	0.07	0.112	0.375	0.167	0.037
	Insist on	0.062	0.118	0.378	0.165	0.035
	Accuracy and authenticity of data	0.067	0.111	0.366	0.167	0.039
	Respect for the right of acting	0.065	0.107	0.361	0.163	0.035
	Protect the privacy of the subjects	0.081	0.103	0.357	0.162	0.035
	Normative reference	0.073	0.117	0.344	0.164	0.036

Total variance interpretation

Rotational load squared	Constituent
	1	2	3
Eigenvalues	9.034	6.117	5.833
The percentage of variance	34.681	23.592	22.059
cumulative	34.681	58.273	80.332

The component matrix of the rotation

Index	The number of component factors of the rescale
	1	2	3
Literature review capability	0.871	0.238	0.163
To master the specific steps of education	0.864	0.235	0.151
Inductive sum	0.86	0.227	0.088
Ability to apply and promote results	0.861	0.262	0.191
Data analysis ability	0.864	0.255	0.207
Literature retrieval ability	0.858	0.235	0.18
To master the basic theory of education	0.851	0.24	0.111
The planning capacity of the research direction	0.844	0.283	0.239
Methodology of education research	0.837	0.272	0.252
Basic theory of pedagogy psychology	0.794	0.262	0.277
Discipline theory and knowledge	0.763	0.231	0.291
The understanding of scientific research promotion teaching	0.173	0.83	0.331
The understanding of scientific research and promotion of professional development	0.153	0.82	0.383
Understanding the significance of scientific research	0.196	0.804	0.311
Will of scientific research	0.33	0.804	0.23
Interest in research	0.331	0.771	0.232
Will be the will of the research teacher	0.392	0.767	0.138
Ability to find problems	0.473	0.656	0.268
Ability to provide new ideas	0.501	0.635	0.246
Ability to reflect on teaching	0.411	0.622	0.355
Respect research objects	0.211	0.287	0.907
Insist on	0.208	0.292	0.907
Accuracy and authenticity of data	0.218	0.289	0.883
Respect for the right of acting	0.211	0.274	0.883
Protect the privacy of the subjects	0.24	0.262	0.863
Normative reference	0.246	0.288	0.836

Evaluation index data based on the same population size and iteration number

Index	BP	SSA-BP	FASSA-BP	PSO-BP
MRE	0.445%	0.358%	0.158%	0.107%
MSE	8.617%	5.913%	2.398%	1.819%
MAE	25.872%	19.301%	11.793%	10.060%
RMSE	0.2951	0.2462	0.1655	0.1288
R2	0.9834	0.9875	0.9987	0.9991

The actual value of the sample is relative to the model evaluation

Test set sample	True value	Evaluation grade	Model evaluation	Corresponding grade	Relative error	Grade accurate
1	56	Fifth level	55.9551	Fifth level	-0.0449	Yes
2	54	Fifth level	54.301	Fifth level	0.301	Yes
3	58	Fifth level	58.387	Fifth level	0.387	Yes
4	74	Seventh level	73.8721	Seventh level	-0.1279	Yes
5	51	Fifth level	51.079	Fifth level	0.079	Yes
6	52	Fifth level	52.3933	Fifth level	0.3933	Yes
7	71	Seventh level	71.154	Seventh level	0.154	Yes
8	63	Six level	63.4285	Six level	0.4285	Yes
9	56	Fifth level	56.1951	Fifth level	0.1951	Yes
10	68	Six level	67.5647	Six level	-0.4353	Yes
11	48	Four level	47.7384	Four level	-0.2616	Yes
12	51	Fifth level	51.125	Fifth level	0.125	Yes
13	74	Seventh level	73.9559	Seventh level	-0.0441	Yes
14	72	Seventh level	72.0579	Seventh level	0.0579	Yes

Evaluation index based on optimal population size and iteration number

Index	BP	SSA-BP	GA-BP	PSO-BP
MRE	0.4%	0.2765%	0.1565%	0.1386%
MSE	8.4866%	3.9755%	1.9027%	1.0203%
MAE	25.317%	14.638%	12.505%	7.64%
RMSE	0.2964	0.2043	0.1353	0.1015
R2	0.9819	0.9812	0.9906	0.9989

Evaluation result

Teacher number	Output	Grade
1	52.8981	Fifth level
2	50.2208	Fifth level
3	72.8602	Seventh level
4	66.2254	Six level
5	73.3937	Seventh level