<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The rise of complex social disputes in the digital age challenges traditional legal resolution methods. The SmartSettle platform emerges as a pioneering response, leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance the dispute resolution process. By integrating advanced algorithms, SmartSettle offers an efficient, fair, and user-friendly online environment for dispute resolution, marking a significant evolution in legal research and practice. This study examines SmartSettle’s effectiveness within the extensive data landscape, employing qualitative and quantitative methods to assess its seven core algorithms. In 2022, SmartSettle achieved a remarkable success rate of over 95% across 13,550 cases in M City. The platform guarantees equitable outcomes and high satisfaction levels among parties through its innovative minimum gain maximization algorithm. Consequently, SmartSettle effectively manages legal disputes in a big data context and sets a new trajectory for legal research and practice.</p>
</abstract>

The rise of complex social disputes in the digital age challenges traditional legal resolution methods. The SmartSettle platform emerges as a pioneering response, leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance the dispute resolution process. By integrating advanced algorithms, SmartSettle offers an efficient, fair, and user-friendly online environment for dispute resolution, marking a significant evolution in legal research and practice. This study examines SmartSettle’s effectiveness within the extensive data landscape, employing qualitative and quantitative methods to assess its seven core algorithms. In 2022, SmartSettle achieved a remarkable success rate of over 95% across 13,550 cases in M City. The platform guarantees equitable outcomes and high satisfaction levels among parties through its innovative minimum gain maximization algorithm. Consequently, SmartSettle effectively manages legal disputes in a big data context and sets a new trajectory for legal research and practice.

A Study on the Multiple Dispute Resolution Mechanisms of Systemic Jurisprudence in the Context of Big Data

School of Law and School of Discipline Inspection and Supervision of Fujian Normal University

Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The rise of complex social disputes in the digital age challenges traditional legal resolution methods. The SmartSettle platform emerges as a pioneering...

A Study on the Multiple Dispute Resolution Mechanisms of Systemic Jurisprudence in the Context of Big Data

Data publikacji: 03 maj 2024

Zakres stron: -

Otrzymano: 16 kwi 2024

Przyjęty: 25 kwi 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0859

Słowa kluczowe
Big Data, Multiple Dispute Resolution, Smartsettle, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR)

© 2024 Zhaozeng Ding, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

A Study on the Multiple Dispute Resolution Mechanisms of Systemic Jurisprudence in the Context of Big Data

Data publikacji: 03 maj 2024

Zakres stron: -

Otrzymano: 16 kwi 2024

Przyjęty: 25 kwi 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0859

Słowa kluczoweBig Data, Multiple Dispute Resolution, Smartsettle, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR)

© 2024 Zhaozeng Ding, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Słowa kluczowe
Big Data, Multiple Dispute Resolution, Smartsettle, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR)