Research on Electricity Operation Behaviour Recognition Strategy Combined with Intelligent Image Recognition and Its Key Technology

[1] Tomporowski, A., Józef Flizikowski, Kruszelnicka, W., Piasecka, I., & Kovalyshyn, S. (2018). Destructiveness of profits and outlays associated with operation of offshore wind electric power plant. part 1: identification of a model and its components. Polish Maritime Research, 25(2). Search in Google Scholar

[2] Li, J., & Wen, Y. Y. (2022). Association analysis of human error causes of electric shock construction accidents in china. Archives of civil engineering. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Franklin, R. C. (2021). Shaping frontline practices: a scoping review of human factors implicated in electrical safety incidents. Safety, 7. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Baby, T., Madhu, G., & Renjith, V. R. (2021). Occupational electrical accidents: assessing the role of personal and safety climate factors. Safety Science, 139(july 2021), 105229. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chan, A. P. C., Wong, F. K. W., Hon, C. K. H., & Choi, T. N. Y. (2020). Construction of a bayesian network model for improving the safety performance of electrical and mechanical (e&m) works in repair, maintenance, alteration and addition (rmaa) projects. Safety Science, 131, 104893. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Gammon, T., & Jamil, S. (2020). The disconnect between electrical safety and electrical accident prevention. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, PP(99), XX6-XX6. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Haluik, A. (2017). Improving electrical safety: risk perception and decision making in hazard analysis. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, 23(3), 33-41. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Biering, K., Krgaard, A., Carstensen, O., & Nielsen, K. J. (2021). Incidence and immediate consequences of electrical shocks among danish electricians: a cohort study. BMJ Open, 11(8), e046584. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kim, J., & Lee, S. J. (2019). Reduction of trip operating time of electronic type elcb to 9 mili-seconds for safety improvement of electrical facility. IEICE Electronics Express, 16(19). Search in Google Scholar

[10] Bugaris, R. M., & Floyd Ii, H. L. (2021). Engaging safety professionals in electrical safety topics: a survey of decision-making processes, best practices, and industry challenges. IEEE industry applications magazine (3), 27. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Osburn, L., Lee, H. W., & Gambatese, J. A. (2022). Formal prevention through design process and implementation for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing worker safety. Journal of management in engineering. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Yang, J., & Kim, J. (2020). Accident diagnosis algorithm with untrained accident identification during power-increasing operation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 202. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Wu, G., Mao, Y., He, Y., Lu, Y., Jia, M., & Fu, S. (2022). Safety archetypes identification and behavior simulation for nuclear power plant operation human reliability improvement. Annals of nuclear energy (Sep.), 174. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wang, W., Cui, J., Hu, R., Zhang, X., & Lin, Q. (2017). Discussion on related technologies of supervision and control terminal based on smart remote terminal unit. Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 41(16), 187-191. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Yu, H., Liu, R., Zhu, L., Han, H., He, Z., & Liu, W., et al. (2021). AREA SEMANTIC LEARNING AND MAP POINT IDENTIFICATION METHOD FOR POWER TRANSFORMATION OPERATION SCENE. WO2021249575A1. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Chang, Z., Deng, Y., Wu, J., Xiong, X., Chen, M., & Wang, H., et al. (2022). Safety risk assessment of electric power operation site based on variable precision rough set. Journal of circuits, systems and computers. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Li, Y., Zhang, F., Li, Y., Li, B., & Li, Z. (2019). Evaluating the power grid investment behavior in china: from the perspective of government supervision. Energies, 12(21), 4192-. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Su, W., Gao, X., Jiang, Y., & Li, J. (2021). Developing a construction safety standard system to enhance safety supervision efficiency in china: a theoretical simulation of the evolutionary game process. Sustainability, 13. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Yang, X., Tian, Y., Feng, K., Yang, J., Zhang, S. H., & Wang, S. (2020). Signal game analysis on the effectiveness of coal mine safety supervision based on the affective events theory. Complexity, 2020(1), 1-9. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Gunduz, M., & Abu-Hijleh, A. (2020). Assessment of human productivity drivers for construction labor through importance rating and risk mapping. Sustainability, 12. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Wang, T., Gao, S., Li, X., & Ning, X. (2018). A meta-network-based risk evaluation and control method for industrialized building construction projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205(PT.1-1162), 552-564. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Zholmagambetov, A. M. D. E. R. (2021). Investigation of aluminum-titanium alloys production and labor safety in metal smelting process. Metalurgija, 60(3a4). Search in Google Scholar

[23] Nie, X. X., Bai, C., & Zhang, J. (2019). Simulation research on the effectiveness of a multiagent mine safety supervision system and its verification. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019(33), 1-18. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Golabchi, A., Han, S. U., & Abourizk, S. (2018). A simulation and visualization-based framework of labor efficiency and safety analysis for prevention through design and planning. Automation in Construction, 96(DEC.), 310-323. Search in Google Scholar