Comparison of two different file systems on postoperative pain after root canal instrumentation: A randomized controlled trial

1 Su Y, Wang C, Ye L. Healing rate and post-obturation pain of single-versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment for infected root canals: a systematic review. Journal of endodontics. 2011;37(2):125-32. Search in Google Scholar

2 Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Journal of endodontics. 2013;39(2):258-61. Search in Google Scholar

3 Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. International endodontic journal. 2008;41(4):339-44. Search in Google Scholar

4 Ninan E, Berzins DW. Torsion and bending properties of shape memory and superelastic nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Journal of endodontics. 2013;39(1):101-4. Search in Google Scholar

5 Kherlakian D, Cunha RS, Ehrhardt IC, Zuolo ML, Kishen A, da Silveira Bueno CE. Comparison of the incidence of postoperative pain after using 2 reciprocating systems and a continuous rotary system: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Journal of Endodontics. 2016;42(2):171-6. Search in Google Scholar

6 de Oliveira Alves V. Endodontic flare-ups: a prospective study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2010;110(5):e68-e72. Search in Google Scholar

7 Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single and multiple visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review. International endodontic journal. 2008;41(2):91-9. Search in Google Scholar

8 Ehrmann E, Messer H, Adams G. The relationship of intracanal medicaments to postoperative pain in endodontics. International endodontic journal. 2003;36(12):868-75. Search in Google Scholar

9 Shuping GB, Ørstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. Journal of endodontics. 2000;26(12):751-5. Search in Google Scholar

10 Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. Effectiveness of single versus multiple visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Endodontic Journal. 2005;38(6):347-55. Search in Google Scholar

11 Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. Journal of endodontics. 2011;37(4):429-38. Search in Google Scholar

12 Shibu TM. Post operative pain in endodontics: A systemic review. Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene. 2015;7(8):130-7. Search in Google Scholar

13 Alsulaimani RS, Al-Manei K, Baras B, Alaqeely R, El Metwally A, Ashri N. Students’ perception of multiple dental visits for root canal treatment: Questionnaire-based study. Saudi Endodontic Journal. 2016;6(1):21. Search in Google Scholar

14 Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. European journal of dentistry. 2017;11(03):376-9. Search in Google Scholar

15 Ochoa-Romero T, Mendez-Gonzalez V, Flores-Reyes H, Pozos-Guillen A. Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2011;35(4):359-64. Search in Google Scholar

16 Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim S, Stachniss V. Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by students. International endodontic journal. 2003;36(4):246-55. Search in Google Scholar

17 Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, et al. Validation of digital visual analog scale pain scoring with a traditional paper-based visual analog scale in adults. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global research & reviews. 2018;2(3). Search in Google Scholar

18 Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2011;41(6):1073-93. Search in Google Scholar

19 Cicek E, Kocak MM, Kocak S, Sağlam BC, Türker SA. Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2017;25:20-6. Search in Google Scholar

20 Al-Negrish ARS, Habahbeh R. Flare up rate related to root canal treatment of asymptomatic pulpally necrotic central incisor teeth in patients attending a military hospital. Journal of dentistry. 2006;34(9):635-40. Search in Google Scholar

21 Attar S, Bowles WR, Baisden MK, Hodges JS, McClanahan SB. Evaluation of pretreatment analgesia and endodontic treatment for postoperative endodontic pain. Journal of endodontics. 2008;34(6):652-5. Search in Google Scholar

22 Jabeen S. A study of post obturation pain following single visit root canal treatment. Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal. 2013;12(3):16-9. Search in Google Scholar

23 Watkins CA, Logan HL, Kirchner HL. Anticipated and experienced pain associated with endodontic therapy. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2002;133(1):45-54. Search in Google Scholar

24 Pereira MP, Pogatzki-Zahn E. Gender aspects in postoperative pain. Current opinion in anaesthesiology. 2015;28(5):546-58. Search in Google Scholar

25 Arias A, Azabal M, Hidalgo JJ, José C. Relationship between postendodontic pain, tooth diagnostic factors, and apical patency. Journal of endodontics. 2009;35(2):189-92. Search in Google Scholar

26 Myles PS, Troedel S, Boquest M, Reeves M. The pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear? Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1999;89(6):1517. Search in Google Scholar

27 Gondim Jr E, Setzer FC, Dos Carmo CB, Kim S. Postoperative pain after the application of two different irrigation devices in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Journal of Endodontics. 2010;36(8):1295-301. Search in Google Scholar

28 AlRahabi MK. Predictors, prevention, and management of postoperative pain associated with nonsurgical root canal treatment: A systematic review. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2017;12(5):376. Search in Google Scholar

29 Tinaz AC, Alacam T, Uzun O, Maden M, Kayaoglu G. The effect of disruption of apical constriction on periapical extrusion. Journal of endodontics. 2005;31(7):533-5. Search in Google Scholar

30 Elmsallati EA, Wadachi R, Suda H. Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: a pilot study. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2009;35(2):65-9. Search in Google Scholar

31 Baugh D, Wallace J. The role of apical instrumentation in root canal treatment: a review of the literature. Journal of endodontics. 2005;31(5):333-40. Search in Google Scholar

32 Ruiz-Hubard EE, Gutmann JL, Wagner MJ. A quantitative assessment of canal debris forced periapically during root canal instrumentation using two different techniques. Journal of endodontics. 1987;13(12):554-8. Search in Google Scholar

33 Tanalp J, Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, Bayirl G. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systems. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2006;101(2):250-7. Search in Google Scholar

34 Ferraz C, Gomes N, Gomes B, Zaia A, Teixeira F, Souza-Filho F. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques. International endodontic journal. 2001;34(5):354-8. Search in Google Scholar

35 Hinrichs RE, Walker III WA, Schindler WG. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems. Journal of endodontics. 1998;24(2):102-6. Search in Google Scholar

36 Nevares G, Xavier F, Gominho L, Cavalcanti F, Cassimiro M, Romeiro K, et al. Apical extrusion of debris produced during continuous rotating and reciprocating motion. The Scientific World Journal. 2015;2015. Search in Google Scholar

37 Surakanti JR, Venkata RCP, Vemisetty HK, Dandolu RK, Jaya NKM, Thota S. Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper™, Hyflex™ and Waveone™ rotary systems. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2014;17(2):129. Search in Google Scholar

38 Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments. Journal of Endodontics. 2014;40(10):1638-41. Search in Google Scholar

39 Seago ST, Bergeron BE, Kirkpatrick TC, Roberts MD, Roberts HW, Himel VT, et al. Effect of repeated simulated clinical use and sterilization on the cutting efficiency and flexibility of Hyflex CM nickel-titanium rotary files. Journal of endodontics. 2015;41(5):725-8. Search in Google Scholar

40 Kamali S, Turkaydin D. Cyclic fatigue resistance and shaping ability of heat-treated nickel-titanium instruments after repeated use. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2021;24(2):247-. Search in Google Scholar

41 Thompson M, Sidow SJ, Lindsey K, Chuang A, McPherson III JC. Evaluation of a new filing system’s ability to maintain canal morphology. Journal of endodontics. 2014;40(6):867-70. Search in Google Scholar

42 Altundasar E, Nagas E, Uyanik O, Serper A. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2011;112(4):e31-e5. Search in Google Scholar

43 Yost RA, Bergeron BE, Kirkpatrick TC, Roberts MD, Roberts HW, Himel VT, et al. Evaluation of 4 different irrigating systems for apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite. Journal of endodontics. 2015;41(9):1530-4. Search in Google Scholar

44 Desai P, Himel V. Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems. Journal of endodontics. 2009;35(4):545-9. Search in Google Scholar

45 Alkahtani A, Al Khudhairi TD, Anil S. A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(1):1-7. Search in Google Scholar

46 Mostafa M, El-Shrief Y, Anous W, Hassan M, Salamah F, El Boghdadi R, et al. Postoperative pain following endodontic irrigation using 1.3% versus 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in mandibular molars with necrotic pulps: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. International endodontic journal. 2020;53(2):154-66. Search in Google Scholar

47 Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2019;37(1):75. Search in Google Scholar

48 Krithikadatta J, Sekar V, Sudharsan P, Velumurugan N. Influence of three Ni–Ti cleaning and shaping files on postinstrumentation endodontic pain: A triple-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2016;19(4):311. Search in Google Scholar

49 Bahrololoomi Z, Tabrizizadeh M, Salmani L. In vitro comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning capacity between rotary and manual preparation techniques in primary anterior teeth. Frontiers in Dentistry. 2007:59-62. Search in Google Scholar

50 Katge F, Chimata VK, Poojari M, Shetty S, Rusawat B. Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time between rotary and manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth: an in vitro study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2016;9(2):124. Search in Google Scholar

51 Saber S, Nagy M, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaC e and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. International endodontic journal. 2015;48(2):131-6. Search in Google Scholar

52 Bürklein S, Börjes L, Schäfer E. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with H yflex CM and R evo-S rotary nickel–titanium instruments. International endodontic journal. 2014;47(5):470-6. Search in Google Scholar