[
1. Shillingburg HT, Sather DA. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Sivakumar S, Management of Partial Edentulism Using Nonrigid Connectors as a Treatment Modality: A Case Report. Cureus 2020;12(4): e779010.7759/cureus.7790
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Kuruvila A, Joseph S, Jayalekshmi NL, Menon SK. The key to the management of pier abutment: An alternative approach. J Int Oral Health 2017;9:136-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Rudd KD, O’Leary TJ, Stumpf AJ. Horizontal tooth mobility in carefully screened subjects. Periodontics 1964;2:65–68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Parfitt GJ. Measurement of the physiological mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction. J Dent Res 1960;39:608–618.10.1177/00220345600390032201
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. McCall JO, Hugel IM. Movable-removable bridgework: Principles and practice as developed by Herman ES Chayes, DDS. Dent Items Interest 1949;71:512–525.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Banerjee S, Khongshei A, Gupta T, Banerjee A. Non-rigid connector: The wand to allay the stresses on abutment. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011 Oct;2(4):351-4.10.4103/0976-237X.91802
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Akulwar RS, Kodgi A. Non-Rigid Connector for Managing Pier Abutment in FPD: A Case Report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jul;8(7):ZD12-3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Shillingburg HT Jr, Fisher DW. Nonrigid connectors for fixed partial dentures. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;87:1195–1199.10.14219/jada.archive.1973.0552
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. Load transfer by fixed partial dentures with three abutments. Quintessence Int 1988;19:403–410.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Rani P, Malhotra P. Breaking the stress with a non-rigid connector. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Oct-Dec;27(4):391-393.10.4103/npmj.npmj_184_20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. De Souza N, Da Costa GC, Chalakkal P, Mascarenhas K. Fixed functional space maintainer incorporating a tenon-mortise connector. Contemp Clin Dent 2018;9:649-51.10.4103/ccd.ccd_722_18
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Mishra A, Palaskar J, Madhav VN, Chopade SR. Pier abutment: Break the stress. Ann Prosthod Rest Dent 2016;2:126-810.18231/2455-8486.2016.0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Markley MR. Broken-stress principle and design in fixed bridge prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1951;1:416–423.10.1016/0022-3913(51)90027-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Yaqoob A, Rasheed N, Ashraf J, YaqubG. Nonrigid semi-precision connectors for FPD. Dent Med Res2014;2:17-2110.4103/2348-1471.131559
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Sutherland JK, Holland GA, Sluder TB, White JT. A photoelastic analysis of the stress distribution in bone supporting fixed partial dentures of rigid and nonrigid design. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:616–623.10.1016/0022-3913(80)90457-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Babu K A S, Haripriya P, Pottem S R, Voleti H C K, Tannamala P K, FPD with difference in connectors: A case report. Int J Oral Health Dent 2019;5(3):147-15010.18231/j.ijohd.2019.033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Prasad DK, Hegde C, Bardia A, Prasad DA. Questionable abutments: General considerations, changing trends in treatment planning and available options. J Interdiscip Dentistry 2013;3:12-7.10.4103/2229-5194.120516
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Patel R, Dahane T, Khungar P, Godbole S, Kambala SS. Safeguarding the pier abutment. J Datta Meghe Inst Med Sci Univ 2020;15:495-910.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_168_20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Oruc S, Eraslan O, Tukay HA, Atay A. Stress analysis of effects of non rigid connector on fixed partial denture dentures with pier abutments. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:185-9210.1016/S0022-3913(08)60042-6
]Search in Google Scholar
