The ombudsman idea in Ireland is now almost fifty years old. This article provides a citizen perspective on several ombudsman-type institutions and services across a broad variety of fields and issues. The underlying assump -tions of ombudsman-type services are outlined, with a citizen perspective of how they work in practice. Ten illustrative case studies are provided, each followed by a short commentary. The article analyses the cross-cutting issues arising: the uneven resource field in skills, knowledge and time; the need for ‘blue sea’ between the ombudsman-type institution and state agencies; the evidence bar for complaints; and the individualisation of complaints when there are systemic issues important for public administration. Because of the asymmetry of resources between the two parties, there is a strong case for ombudsman-type institutions to provide more assistance to complainants to advance and progress their complaints, so that a more level playing field can be achieved.
Keywords
- Ombudsman
- level playing field
- evidence bar
- individualisation
The complexity of the challenge: Communicating government Irish audiences and news information from official sources during Covid-19 How ‘cocooning’ as a public health measure was reported during the Covid-19 crisis From denial to delay: Climate change discourses in Ireland A new nation brand strategy? Global Ireland 2025 and the UN Security Council campaign The rise and fall of the Strategic Communications Unit, 2017–18 Taoisigh and addressing the nation Ireland’s Covid-19 response: Perspectives from science communication Assessing government communication – A roundtable