<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>We will focus on the intensifying technologization of government affairs and the ensuing question: does this lead to a bureaucratically dominated technocracy? The coining of the concept of ›technocracy‹ is attributed to the engineer William Henry Smyth in 1919: »The rule of the people made effective through the agency of their servants, the scientists and engineers«. We will examine past and present debates on possible adverse effects of technocracy on the scope for democratic governance and thus the position of political leaders and citizens in decision making.</p>
</abstract>

We will focus on the intensifying technologization of government affairs and the ensuing question: does this lead to a bureaucratically dominated technocracy? The coining of the concept of ›technocracy‹ is attributed to the engineer William Henry Smyth in 1919: »The rule of the people made effective through the agency of their servants, the scientists and engineers«. We will examine past and present debates on possible adverse effects of technocracy on the scope for democratic governance and thus the position of political leaders and citizens in decision making.

An Unbound Prometheus? Bureaucracy, Technology, Technocracy, and Administrative Innovation

Administory

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

We will focus on the intensifying technologization of government affairs and the ensuing question: does this lead to a bureaucratically dominated technocracy?...

An Unbound Prometheus? Bureaucracy, Technology, Technocracy, and Administrative Innovation

Data publikacji: 14 gru 2022

Zakres stron: 208 - 218

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/adhi-2022-0008

© 2022 Frits M. Van Der Meer et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.