1. bookTom 26 (2021): Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2255-8691
Pierwsze wydanie
08 Nov 2012
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

Solution to Analysis of IT System User Behaviour Using AI/ML Algorithms

Data publikacji: 30 Dec 2021
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 26 (2021) - Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Zakres stron: 107 - 115
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2255-8691
Pierwsze wydanie
08 Nov 2012
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

Insufficient user involvement, lack of user feedback, incomplete and changing user requirements are some of the critical reasons for the difficulty of IS usage, which could potentially reduce the number of customers. Under the previous authors’ research, the method for analysing the behaviour of IT system users was developed, which was intended to improve the usability of the system and thus could increase the efficiency of business processes. The developed method is based on the use of graph searching algo rithms, Markov chains and Machine Learning approach. This paper focuses on detailing of method output data in the context of definition of their importance based on expert evaluation and demonstration of visual presentation of different UX analysis situations. The paper briefly reminds the essence of the method, including both the input and output data sets, and, with the help of experts, evaluates the expected result in the context of their importance in UX analysis. It also introduces visualization prototype developed to obtain the output data, which allows verifying the input/output data transformation possibilities and expected data acquisition potential.

Keywords

[1] K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[2] E. Voskresenskaya, L. Vorona-Slivinskaya, and S. Panov, “Digital transformation of social sector as the factor of development and security of the country,” in E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 135, Art no. 03075, Dec. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20191350307510.1051/e3sconf/201913503075 Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. Hofmann and N. Ogonek, “Different but still the same? How public and private sector organisations deal with new digital competences”, Journal of E-Government, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 127–135, Dec. 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[4] L. Maxwell, E. Taner, and G. M. Jonathan, “Digitalisation in the public sector: Determinant factors,” International Journal of IT/Business Alignment and Governance, vol. 10, no. 2, Art no. 3, pp. 35–52, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJITBAG.201907010310.4018/IJITBAG.2019070103 Search in Google Scholar

[5] O. Ņikiforova, V. Zabiniako, J. Kornienko, M. Gasparoviča-Asīte, and A. Siliņa, “Mapping of source and target data for application to machine learning driven discovery of IS usability problems,” Applied Computer Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 22–30, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2021-000310.2478/acss-2021-0003 Search in Google Scholar

[6] P. Osipov, L. Aleksejeva, A. Borisov, Y. Chizhov, T. Zmanovska, and V. Zabiniako, “Implementation and operation aspects of a system for detecting abnormally level of user activity,” Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 417–425, Nov. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3103/S014641161706005010.3103/S0146411617060050 Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. Roth, “User interface and user experience (UI/UX) design”, Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2017.2.510.22224/gistbok/2017.2.5 Search in Google Scholar

[8] N. Behare, S. Waghulkar, S. A. Shah, “A theoretical perspective on customer experience (CX) in digital business strategy,” in 2018 International Conference on Research in Intelligent and Computing in Engineering (RICE), 2018, pp. 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RICE.2018.850907910.1109/RICE.2018.8509079 Search in Google Scholar

[9] C. Pribeanu, “A revised set of usability heuristics for the evaluation of interactive systems”, Informatica Economica, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 31–38, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.12948/issn14531305/21.3.2017.0310.12948/issn14531305/21.3.2017.03 Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. Nielsen, “Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics,” in CHI ‘94: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 1994, pp. 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.19172910.1145/191666.191729 Search in Google Scholar

[11] H. Degen, G. Guillen, and H. Schmidt, “Effectiveness and cost-benefit ratio of weekly user group sessions,” in Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design Philosophy and Theory, LNCS 11583, A. Marcus, W. Wang, Eds. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2019, pp. 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23570-3_1610.1007/978-3-030-23570-3_16 Search in Google Scholar

[12] B. Saket, A. Endert, and J. Stasko, “Beyond usability and performance: A review of user experience-focused evaluations in visualization,” in Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors on Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization, Oct. 2016, pp. 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/2993901.299390310.1145/2993901.2993903 Search in Google Scholar

[13] V. Nassar, “Common criteria for usability review,” Work, vol. 41, Art no. 1, pp. 1053–1057, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0282-105310.3233/WOR-2012-0282-105322316859 Search in Google Scholar

[14] H. A. Linstone and M. Turoff, The Delphi Method. Techniques and Applications. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975. Search in Google Scholar

[15] O. Ņikiforova, “Methodology for comparison of software development means”, PhD dissertation, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia, 2001. Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo