1. bookTom 26 (2021): Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2255-8691
Pierwsze wydanie
08 Nov 2012
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

Solution to On-line vs On-site Work Efficiency Analysis on the Example of Engineering System Designer Work

Data publikacji: 30 Dec 2021
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 26 (2021) - Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Zakres stron: 87 - 95
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2255-8691
Pierwsze wydanie
08 Nov 2012
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

Day-to-day working activities have been heavily altered by COVID-19 pandemic, forcing a transition from traditional on-site work to on-line telework across the whole world. It has become much harder to efficiently organise, guide and evaluate employee’s work. There are different factors that can influence “work from home” quality, and many of these affect such work negatively. A set of relevant methods and tools should be developed which could improve this situation. The goal of the study is to summarise related background of this problem and to propose an approach to overcoming this problem. To achieve the goal, design engineer’s work is evaluated in an appropriate environment (e.g., AutoCAD, etc.) using automated analysis and visualization of IS auditing data.

Keywords

[1] D. Ahrendt, M. Mascherini, T. Leoncikas, and E. Sandor, “Living, working and COVID-19: First findings”, 2020. [Online]. Available on: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2020/living-working-and-covid-19 Search in Google Scholar

[2] “The 2020 state of remote work”, Buffer, 2020. [Online]. Available on: https://lp.buffer.com/state-of-remote-work-2020 Search in Google Scholar

[3] J. Andrews, “20 tips for remote employee performance reviews”, [Online]. Available on: https://performancereviews.net/8-tips-for-evaluating-telework Search in Google Scholar

[4] International Labour Organization, “Practical guide on teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond”. [Online]. Available on: https://www.ilo.org/moscow/news/WCMS_751232/lang--en/index.htm Search in Google Scholar

[5] The European Commission’s science and knowledge service, “Telework in the EU before and after the COVID-19: where we were, where we head to”, [Online]. Available on: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/default/files/jrc120945_policy_brief_-_covid_and_telework_final.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[6] Alex, “How to measure and evaluate performance of your engineers”, Waydev, Mar. 2020. [Online]. Available on: https://waydev.co/how-to-measure-and-evaluate-performance-of-your-engineers/ Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. G. Cohen, D. E. Bailey, “What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite”, Journal of Management, vol. 23, no. 3, June 1997. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063970230030310.1177/014920639702300303 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kissflow, “Business process modeling: Definition, benefits and how to”. [Online]. Available on: https://kissflow.com/workflow/bpm/business-process-modeling/ Search in Google Scholar

[9] Klipfolio, “What is a KPI? Measure your performance against key business objectives”. [Online]. Available on: https://www.klipfolio.com/resources/articles/what-is-a-key-performance-indicator Search in Google Scholar

[10] W. D. Li, W. F. Lu, J. Y. H. Fuh, Y. S. Wong, “Collaborative computer-aided design — research and development status”, Computer-Aided Design, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 931–940, Aug. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2004.09.02010.1016/j.cad.2004.09.020 Search in Google Scholar

[11] H. L. Nattrass, G. K. Okita, “Some computer aided engineering system design principles,” in 20th Design Automation Conference Proceedings, Miami Beach, FL, USA, June 1983, pp. 571–577. https://doi.org/10.1109/DAC.1983.158571110.1109/DAC.1983.1585711 Search in Google Scholar

[12] R. Sacks and R. Barak, “Impact of three-dimensional parametric modeling of buildings on productivity in structural engineering practice”, Automation in Construction, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 439–449, May 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.08.00310.1016/j.autcon.2007.08.003 Search in Google Scholar

[13] B. Shoemaker, “Engineering productivity measurement”, 2001. [Online]. Available on: https://slideplayer.com/slide/7051777/ Search in Google Scholar

[14] H. R. Thomas, Q. C. Korte, V. E. Sanvido, and M. K. Parfitt, “Conceptual model for measuring productivity of design and engineering”, Journal of Architectural Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Mar. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1999)5:1(1)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1999)5:1(1) Search in Google Scholar

[15] Y. Yin, S. Qin, and R. Holland, “Development of a project level performance measurement model for improving collaborative design team work”, in 2008 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Xi’an, China, Apr. 2008, pp. 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD.2008.453697010.1109/CSCWD.2008.4536970 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Autodesk, Inc., “AutoCAD architecture: User’s guide”, 2010. [Online]. Available on: https://images.autodesk.com/adsk/files/autocad_aca_user_guide_english.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lotsia Soft, “Lotsia PDM PLUS”, 2021. [Online]. Available on: https://lotsia.com/software/lotsia-pdm-plus Search in Google Scholar

[18] M. P. Groover, Work Systems: The Methods, Measurement & Management of Work. Pearson, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

[19] D. Mollenhauer and M. Atzmüller, “Sequential exceptional pattern discovery using pattern-growth: An extensible framework for interpretable machine learning on sequential data”, 2020. [Online]. Available on: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2796/xi-ml-2020_mollenhauer.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[20] L. J. Lopez, D. H. Garcia, M. Talancon, M. A. Camacho, and A. F. Valentin, “Mathematical modeling for design thinking innovation method based on Markov chain theory”, NISCAIR Online Periodicals Repository, pp. 135–138, 2019. [Online]. Available on: http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/45950 Search in Google Scholar

[21] S. A. Mubarak, “Bar (Gantt) Charts”, in Construction Project Scheduling and Control, pp. 16–22, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470912171.ch210.1002/9780470912171.ch2 Search in Google Scholar

[22] B. Etzel, Personal Information Management: Tools and Techniques for Achieving Professional Effectiveness. Palgrave, 1999. Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo