Robust control of a chemical reactor with uncertainties

Angeli D and Astolfi A (2007) A tight small-gain theorem for not necessarily ISS systems, Syst. Control Lett. 56(1): 87-91.10.1016/j.sysconle.2006.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Antonelli R, Astolfi A (2003) Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors: Easy to Stabilise? Automatica 39(10): 817-1827.10.1016/S0005-1098(03)00177-8Search in Google Scholar

Bequette BW (1991) Nonlinear control of chemical processes: a review. Industrial Engineering ChemicalResearch 30: 1391-1413.10.1021/ie00055a001Search in Google Scholar

Bosgra OH, Kwakernaak H, Meinsma G (2000) Design methods for control systems, DISC lecture notes 2000-2001, http://web.boun.edu.tr/eskinat/ME687.html, accessed 18. 3. 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Doyle JC, Stein G (1981) Multivariable Feedback Design - Concepts for a Classical Modern Synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 26: 4-16.10.1109/TAC.1981.1102555Search in Google Scholar

Doyle JC (1984) Lecture Notes, ONR/Honeywell Workshop on Advances in Multivariable Control, Minneapolis.Search in Google Scholar

Gerhard J, Monningmann M, Marquardt W (2004). Robust stable nonlinear control and design of a CSTR in a large operating range. In Proceedings of the7th International Symposium on Dynamics and Control ofProcess Systems. Massachusetts. IFAC. 92.10.1016/S1474-6670(17)31813-XSearch in Google Scholar

Green M and Limebeer DNJ (1994) Linear robust control. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.Search in Google Scholar

Henrion D, Tarbouriech S, Kučera V (2005) Control of linear systems subject to time-domain constraints with polynomial pole placement and LMIs, IEEETransactions on Automatic Control 50(9), 1360-1364.10.1109/TAC.2005.854615Search in Google Scholar

Chaves M (2005) Input-to-state stability of rate-controlled biochemical networks, SIAM Journal on Control andOptimization 44(2): 704-727.10.1137/S0363012903437964Search in Google Scholar

Chilali M and Gahinet P (1996) Η∞ design with pole placement constraints: An LMI approach. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 41(3): 358-367.10.1109/9.486637Search in Google Scholar

Ingham J, Dunn IJ, Heinzle E, Přenosil JE (1994) ChemicalEngineering Dynamics. VCH Verlags-gesellschaft. Weinheim.10.1002/9783527616015Search in Google Scholar

Ito H (2008) A degree of flexibility in Lyapunov inequalities for establishing input-to-state stability of interconnected systems, Automatica 44(9): 2340-2346.10.1016/j.automatica.2008.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Jiang ZP, Mareels IMY and Wang Y (1996) A Lyapunov formulation of the nonlinear small-gain theorem for interconnected ISS systems, Automatica 32(8): 1211-1215.10.1016/0005-1098(96)00051-9Search in Google Scholar

Karafyllis I and Zhong-Ping J (2007) A small-gain theorem for a wide class of feedback systems with control application. SIAM Journal on Control andOptimization 46(4): 1483-1517.10.1137/060669310Search in Google Scholar

Khalil HK (1996) Nonlinear systems. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.Search in Google Scholar

Kučera V (2007) Polynomial control: Past, present and future. In Proc. 16th International Conference ProcessControl, Štrbske Pleso 2007, 1-23.10.1002/rnc.1127Search in Google Scholar

Kučera V (2008) A comparison of approaches to solving the H2 control problem. Kybernetika 44(3), 328-335, ISSN 0023-5954.Search in Google Scholar

Kwakernaak H (2002) Mixed sensitivity design. In: 15thIFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain.Search in Google Scholar

Laila DS and Nešić D (2003) Discrete-time Lyapunovbased small-gain theorem for parameterized interconnected ISS systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 48(10): 1783-1788.10.1109/TAC.2003.817928Search in Google Scholar

Luyben WL (2007) Chemical reactor design and control. John Wiley & Sons. New Jersy. ISBN 978-0-470-09770-0.10.1002/9780470134917Search in Google Scholar

Molnar A, Markoš J, Jelemensky Ľ (2002) Accuracy of Mathematical Model with Regard to Safety Analysis of Chemical Reactors. Chemical Papers 56: 357-361.Search in Google Scholar

Nešić D and Liberzon D (2005) A small-gain approach to stability analysis of hybrid systems, in Proc. 44th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control Available: http://decision.csl.uiuc.edu/˜liberzon/publications.html.Search in Google Scholar

Scherer CW (2006) LMI relaxations in robust control, European Journal of Control 12: 3-29, DOI: 10.3166/ ejc.12.3-29.Search in Google Scholar

Scherer C, Gahinet P, Chilali M (1997) Multi-objective output-feedback control via LMI optimization. IEEETrans. Automat. Contr. 42: 896-911.Search in Google Scholar

Sontag ED (1989) Smooth Stabilization Implies Coprime Factorization, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 34: 435-442.10.1109/9.28018Search in Google Scholar

Teel AR (2005) Input-to-State Stability and the Nonlinear Small Gain Theorem, Preprint.Search in Google Scholar

Tlacuahuac AF, Alvarez J, Guerra ES, Oaxaca G (2005) Optimal Transition and Robust Control Design for Exothermic Continuous Reactors. AIChE Journal 51(3): 895-908.10.1002/aic.10345Search in Google Scholar

Vasičkaninová A, Bakošová M (2009) Neural Network Predictive Control of a Chemical Reactor. Acta ChimicaSlovaca 2(2): 21-36.10.7148/2009-0563-0569Search in Google Scholar

Vasičkaninová A, Bakošová M, Karšaiová M (2011) Neuro-fuzzy Control of a Chemical Reactor with Uncertainties. Ed: Fikar M, Kvasnica M, In Proceedingsof the 18th International Conference on Process Control, 360-365, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia.Search in Google Scholar

Veselý V and Harśanyi L (2007) Robust control for dynamic systems (in Slovak). STU, Bratislava.Search in Google Scholar

Yang F, Gani M, Henrion D (2007), Fixed-order robust H∞ controller design with regional pole assignment, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52: 1959-1963, DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2007.90624.Search in Google Scholar

Zames G, Francis BA (1983). Feedback, Minimax Sensitivity and Optimal Robustness. IEEE Transactionson Automatic Control. 28: 586-601. Search in Google Scholar