Otwarty dostęp

The Role of Selected Technological Processes in Drinking Water Treatment


Zacytuj

INTRODUCTION

Water treatment plants face challenges related to the selection of the optimal water treatment technology which has a significant impact on human health and on maintaining the balance of the natural environment. The observed population growth, lower availability of natural freshwater resources and deterioration of its quality are caused by climate and hydrological changes, land use and emerging new environmental pollutants. The list of compounds referred to as emerging pollutants (EP), contaminants of emerging concern (CEC), micropollutants (MP), priority pollutants (PP), persistent toxic substances (PTS) or substances of very high concern (SVHC) is constantly growing [1]. These substances pose a threat to human health and are persistent in the natural environment [2]. These facts justify the urgent need to develop and apply highly efficient and versatile water treatment processes capable of coping with the changing composition of natural organic matter (NOM) and its increasing concentration in the aquatic environment [3]. High values of turbidity, color, planktonic organisms, bacteria and viruses, as well as dissolved organic carbon most often determine the choice of water treatment methods [4].

The removal of turbidity and NOM usually involves the use of several processes, not just one. So far, a number of technological processes have been tested to remove turbidity, NOM, metals and metalloids from water, such as coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration on sand beds, membrane filtration, oxidation and adsorption processes [5]. These methods have their advantages and disadvantages. The use of inorganic coagulants such as aluminium and iron salts removes turbidity and only a part of NOM. The removal of NOM by means of flocculation, oxidation and membrane processes does not always yield the expected efficiency, it is energy-intensive, consumes a large number of chemicals and generates waste [6]. In contrast, coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation/flotation and filtration processes are considered the most economical solutions to remove NOM. Coagulation removes most of NOM in the form of hydrophobic fractions having high molecular weight and to a lesser extent hydrophilic fractions of low molecular weight [7]. In turn, adsorption with granulated activated carbon is one of the best methods of removing NOM (including the hydrophilic fraction) [8]. Also other adsorbents used to remove NOM were tested, e.g. powdered activated carbon (dust), modified carbon, single and multilayer carbon nanotubes, particles of iron oxide (ferrihydrite, goethite, hematite) and magnesium [9], iron oxide-coated sand [10], chitosan, powdered activated carbon composite, polypropylene-coated glass, beads, aminated polyacrylonitrile fibres, chitosan/zeolite composite, rice husk ash, surfactant-modified bentonite, resins (MIEX®) and others [11]. The processes comprised in MIEX®DOC include adsorption, coagulation and ion exchange [12].

The presence of plankton, bacteria and viruses in water also justifies the use of coagulation processes assisted by pre-oxidation, filtration and adsorption as well as disinfection. From the viewpoint of water treatment technology, planktonic organisms that are inactive after the oxidation process have properties similar to those of colloid particles [13]. Microorganisms are made of polar particles, and when lifeless they behave similarly to hydrophilic colloids. The research conducted by [14] demonstrated the high efficiency of coagulation in removing cyanobacteria from water. Researchers also pointed out the need to optimize wastewater treatment processes [15] and the management of post-coagulation sludge (PACl and AlCl3) [16] and sewage sludge [17,18], due to the possibility of releasing cyanobacterial microcysts into the environment [14]. Coagulation conducted as a stand-alone process removes organic matter from water to a small extent, measured as dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and ultraviolet absorbance (UVA254nm). This is because coagulation is effective in removing medium to large DOC molecules. And coagulation combined in the right order with adsorption and/or ion exchange is characterized by high efficiency in the removal of organic pollutants [19].

Organic substances of natural origin tend to form strong organometallic complexes with heavy metals, which have wide bioavailability and high toxicity, and they are also precursors of oxidation and/or disinfection by-products [3]. These products will appear in water when strong oxidants such as chlorine (I) and chlorine (IV) oxide are used for disinfection and/or oxidation in water treatment processes. About 500 by-products of oxidation and/or disinfection are known, whereof about 20% are aliphatic trihalomethanes (THM) and 10% are halogenoacetic acids (HAA), haloacetonitriles (HAN), haloketones and trichloronitromethane along with numerous aromatic halo-DBPs [20].

Water treatment with the use of artificial infiltration is a natural and reagent-free purification process, based on the use of a ground layer as a multifunctional reactor in which chemical, physical and biochemical processes take place. With the current shortage of groundwater and the constant lowering of its level, infiltration should be used more widely [21].

The main research goals set by the author were:

Analysis of water treatment processes used in WTP in Stary Sącz in terms of surface and underground water treatment.

Analysis of the results of tests of selected physico-chemical and bacteriological parameters of water quality (in the period 2018–2022) before treatment processes, after individual stages of treatment and treated water.

Calculation of the efficiency of removing key pollutants that may have a negative impact on the quality of water subjected to water treatment processes at WTP.

Ranking of technological processes in terms of key strategic importance and decisive importance for the removal of a given water quality parameter.

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
Research object and characteristics of treatment processes

The WTP in Stary Sącz, owned by Sądeckie Wodociągi sp. z o. o. (Waterworks L.L.C. in Nowy Sącz) with a maximum capacity of 14,000 m3·d−1 was selected as research object. The WTP treats surface water from the Dunajec River (1) and water from infiltration wells (14), fed with water from the river through a system of infiltration irrigation pools. Water intake from the river is carried out by means of two pipelines anchored in the river bottom (bottom infiltration intake) (2), which supply water to two collecting chambers (3). Water from the collection chambers can be pumped to two independently operating technological lines, i.e. (I) to vertical settling tanks for volumetric coagulation (4) and high-efficiency treatment processes in the amount of max. 500 m3·h−1 and (II) to a set of infiltration water intakes (14) in the amount of max. 190 m3·h−1.

Water in the two vertical settling tanks is subjected to volumetric coagulation and sedimentation, using 10 Lamella plate packs with a total sedimentation area of 285 m2. The coagulant (C) Flokor 1,2A is dosed in the chamber, directly to the pipeline of water flowing onto the settling tanks. The average dose of coagulant per vertical settling tank over the last 5 years is: 761 ml·h−1 and the maximum is 8258 ml·h−1. The retention time in vertical settling tanks is from 40 min. up to 90 min. After the settling tanks, the pre-treated water flows by gravity onto a battery of 10 open self-cleaning Dyna Sand® filters (5) with a dynamic bed, in which the contact coagulation process takes place. The coagulant (C) Flokor 1,2A is added to the water before the filters through a static mixer. The average dose of the coagulant for the filters is 733 ml·h−1 and the maximum dose is 7021 ml·h−1 in the examined period of 5 years. The filters are filled with an anthracite-quartz bed with a grain size of 0.5–1.2 mm, and they operate at a constant filtration speed of 9.0 m·h−1. The contact time of water with the bed is 20 – 40 minutes. The rinse water (in the amount of 28 – 43 m3·h−1) after filters backwash is discharged to the Lamella LS60 separator (10) where it is pre-treated and again returned onto the Dyna Sand® filters. After sand filters, the water flows to the buffer and contact tanks (6) of water with ozone. Ozone is dosed into the water in the amount of 0.2 g·m−3 to 0.5 g·m−3. The reaction time of water with ozone is approx. 20 minutes. Water from the contact tank is pumped to closed pressure filters with a bed of activated carbon made (7) in the form of rollers. The contact time of water with granulated activated carbon is on average 29.3 minutes and max. 13.7 minutes, the average filtration speed is 4.3 m·h−1 and max. 9.2 m·h−1. After the physico-chemical treatment processes, the water is disinfected using UV radiator lamps (8) and chlorine gas dosed before the clean water tanks. Chlorine gas is dosed in an average amount of 137.5 g·h−1.

The infiltration intakes (14) comprise six infiltration pools into which surface water from the Dunajec River is pumped. In the case of low turbidity, water from the Dunajec River is pumped directly to the pools, while in the case of high turbidity, water from the river is pre-treated in Lamella settling tanks. The total area of the infiltration pools is 3,260 m2. The pools are filled with a layer of sand with a thickness of 1 m and a grain size of 0.8–1.0 mm. Then, the water flowing in the ground layer undergoes physico-chemical and biological purification processes and is drawn from the aquifer into the process system by 16 quaternary infiltration wells with a depth of 8–10 m, in the amount of max. 190 m3·h−1. Water from the well can be integrated into the technological system before and after Dyna Sand® filters or, in the case when its quality is good, it is subjected only to physical disinfection with UV rays and chemical disinfection with chlorine gas.

Figure 1.

Technological diagram of the WTP in Stary Sącz [16]

Research methodology

The study used the results of water quality tests carried out by the Accredited Water and Wastewater Testing Laboratory of the “Sądeckie Wodociągi sp. z o. o.” in Nowy Sącz and the technological laboratory at the WTP. The assessment of the effectiveness of technological processes was made on the basis of the analysis of water samples collected over the last 5 years (from 2018 to 2022) at the WTP dynamically operating at full scale. Water samples for qualitative tests were collected at various stages of the treatment process, taking into account the retention time and reaction time as well as the objectives of the publication. With regard to color, turbidity, UVA254nm, permanganatate oxygen demand, it was water from the Dunajec River after pre-coagulation settling tanks, after Dyna Sand® filters, after ozonation, after carbon filters, after ground infiltration process as well as the treated water after the disinfection process. Other indicators, i.e. Fetotal, Mn, coli group bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis and Clostridium perfringens, were determined in water from the Dunajec River, after sand filters, after ground infiltration as well as in the already treated water. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of individual processes against the background of the entire technological process, at the same time, in relation to all the analyzed indicators, the water introduced into the public water supply network was also tested. The studies were carried out in compliance with the currently applicable Regulation [22]. Water turbidity (leading indicator) tests were performed using the nephelometric method, in accordance with PN-EN ISO 7027-1:2016-09, using a 2100AN laboratory turbidimeter by HACH. The color of the water was tested in line with PN-EN ISO 7887:2012; Ap1:2015-06, UVA254nm absorbance according to PN-84, C-04572, permanganatate oxygen demand according to PNEN ISO 8467:2001. In total, from 35 to 1101 tests were carried out in terms of physical and chemical parameters and from 8 to 644 tests in terms of micro-biological parameters, depending on the determined indicator and the stage of water treatment (Table 1).

Efficiency of water pollutant removal at individual stages of the treatment process

2018–2022
Indicator Unit Sampling point Number of samples Value median standard deviation
min. average max.
turbidity NTU Dunajec river 804 0.70 21.30 2550.00 7.60 107.20
after the settlers 804 0.60 5.90 133.00 4.00 6.50
after the filter Dyna Sand 871 0.09 0.22 0.81 0.20 0.06
after ozonation 846 0.10 0.20 0.50 0.20 0.00
after carbon filters 840 0.07 0.10 0.21 0.10 0.00
after infiltration in the ground 506 0.06 0.12 0.85 0.11 0.04
treated water 868 0.06 0.11 0.31 0.10 0.03
color mgPt·dm−3 Dunajec river 869 5.7 29.0 964.8 17.0 54.9
after the settlers 869 3.9 15.2 182.0 14.1 7.7
after the filter Dyna Sand 869 1.8 4.2 9.0 4.1 0.9
after ozonation 869 0.7 2.5 5.8 2.3 0.8
after carbon filters 874 0.0 1.2 3.1 1.1 0.6
after infiltration in the ground 517 0.9 2.2 3.8 2.2 0.4
treated water 875 0.0 0.9 3.6 0.9 0.7
UVA 254nm - Dunajec river 869 0.123 0.396 4.120 0.333 0.279
after the settlers 869 0.123 0.302 1.450 0.29 0.076
after the filter Dyna Sand 869 0.070 0.140 0.257 0.139 0.024
after ozonation 875 0.047 0.107 0.193 0.106 0.022
after carbon filters 874 0.000 0.071 0.126 0.074 0.026
after infiltration in the ground 875 0.000 0.092 0.133 0.092 0.012
treated water 517 0.046 0.064 0.115 0.067 0.026
Permanganatate oxygen demand mg·dm−3 Dunajec river 301 1.44 3.07 10.0 2.7 1.22
after the settlers 319 1.00 2.44 4.1 2.44 0.45
after the filter Dyna Sand 318 0.21 1.32 2.3 1.36 0.34
after carbon filters 333 0.00 0.93 1.76 0.96 0.28
after infiltration in the ground 313 0.00 0.94 3.54 0.34 0.27
treated water 254 0.00 0.78 1.56 0.82 0.34
Fe total mg·dm−3 Dunajec river 126 0.008 0.137 2.480 0.075 0.239
after the filter Dyna Sand 196 0.000 0.008 0.130 0.010 0.012
after infiltration in the ground 226 0.000 0.011 0.109 0.007 0.010
treated water 1101 0.000 0.008 0.090 0.006 0.007
Mn mg·dm−3 Dunajec river 56 0.0004 0.0142 0.0438 0.0094 0.0121
after the filter Dyna Sand 35 0.0000 0.0004 0.0017 0.0004 0.0003
after infiltration in the ground 56 0.0000 0.0001 0.0015 0.0000 0.0003
treated water 56 0.0000 0.0006 0.0244 0.0000 0.0032
coli group bacteria cfu·100cm−1 Dunajec river 84 10 1226 3468 1122 725
after the filter Dyna Sand 162 0 63 319 50 63
after infiltration in the ground 213 0 2 85 0 7
treated water 644 0 0 0 0 0
Enterococcus faecalis cfu·100cm−1 Dunajec river 107 0 248 2000 150 310
after the filter Dyna Sand 168 0 10 98 6 14
after infiltration in the ground 216 0 1 74 0 5
treated water 642 0 0 0 0 0
Clostridium perfringens cfu·100cm−1 Dunajec river 98 16 158 1000 119 141
after the filter Dyna Sand 166 0 3 5 1 5
after infiltration in the ground 8 0 2 0 2 2
treated water 461 0 0 0 0 0

In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of water treatment at its individual stages, the percentage removal of pollutants was calculated for individual water treatment devices, taking into account the water entering the device and the water flowing out of the device, and the retention time at each stage, i.e.:

Raw water from the Dunajec River and water after volumetric coagulation primary settling tanks.

Water before Dyna Sand® filters (after primary settling tanks) and water after sand filters.

Water before the ozone contact tank (after Dyna Sand® filters) and water after ozonation.

Water before carbon filters (after ozonation) and water after carbon filters.

Water after carbon filters (before UV lamp) and water after UV lamp and after chlorination.

Raw water from the Dunajec River and water after ground infiltration, collected from infiltration wells.

RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The efficiency of water pollutant removal at individual stages of the treatment process at the WTP is presented in Table 1.

Technological processes of water treatment at the WTP should be selected so that in time periods of extreme, above-standard values of water quality parameters before treatment, they were able to purify water to the normative values specified in the Regulation of the Minister of Health [22]. In the research work, it was raw water collected from the Dunajec River that was first analyzed. In the studied period, the waters of the Dunajec River were characterized by high dynamics of the variability of physical, chemical and bacteriological parameters (Table 1). Sudden, raised values of turbidity parameters (max. 2550 NTU), color (max. 964.8 mgPt·dm−3), UVA254nm (max. 4120), permanganatate oxygen demand (max.10.0 mg·dm−3), total iron (max. 2.480 mg dm−3), manganese (max. 0.0438 mg·dm−3) were observed in spring and summer (during thaws, storms, sudden outflows of streams or floods). The bacteriological contamination of the Dunajec was determined by the number of coli group bacteria (max. 3468 cfu·100 cm−1), Enterococcus faecalis (max. 2000 cfu·100 cm−1) and Clostridium perfringens (max. 1000 cfu·100 cm−1) (Table 1).

Then, water quality parameters were analyzed in terms of their removal at individual stages of the treatment process. The leading parameter of the ongoing control of technological processes in the selected WTP was turbidity (Figure. 2), the removal of which in the primary settling tanks of volumetric coagulation ranged from 0.0% to 99.6% with an average of 42.4%. The achieved turbidity values after settling tanks are minimum 0.6 NTU, on average 5.0 NTU and a maximum of 133 NTU. Turbidity removal on Dyna Sand filters ranged from 63.3% to 99.6% with an average of 93.2% (min. 0.09 NTU, average 0.22 NTU, max. 0.81 NTU). At the stage of ozonation and carbon filters, turbidity was additionally reduced by an average of 19.0% (min. 0.1 NTU, average 0.2 NTU, max. 0.5 NTU) and by 39.2% (min. 0.07 NTU average 0.10 NTU, max. 0.21 NTU) (Figure 2). The results of the research confirm that the processes responsible mainly for the removal of turbidity in the WTP technological system is volumetric coagulation in primary settling tanks and filtration on sand filters. Also noteworthy is the process of ground infiltration [23], in which turbidities were reduced with high efficiency, comparable to rapid filtration (min. 74.3%, average 96.9% and max. 99.9%) for the minimum values of 0.6 NTU, 0.12 NTU, 0.85 NTU.

Figure 2.

Reduction of turbidity in the WTP technological system

All natural or surface waters, and to a lesser extent underground waters, contain a wide spectrum of organic compounds. A mixture of these compounds is referred to as natural organic matter (NOM) [7]. The range of NOM components may vary seasonally, e.g. when subjected to the impact of rain, snow, flood or drought, which was also observed in the five-year analysis of the Dunajec River waters (Table 1). Extreme weather conditions such as drought or flood are the main cause of changes in the quality and availability of water, and they contribute to the concentration of NOM. In addition to variable composition, the rise of NOM concentrations in freshwater and municipal wastewater has also been observed over the last 20 years. Due to the risk involving the development of oxidation and disinfection by-products, it is important to remove NOM at the water treatment stage before the chemical disinfection processes.

The color of surface waters is mainly caused by humic substances that penetrate the waters as a result of extraction from the soil, or due to the natural decomposition of plant or animal organic matter (humication) [24]. In the tested technological system, color was removed in primary settling tanks supported by volumetric coagulation and sedimentation with an average efficiency of 20.7%; on Dyna Sand filters supported by contact coagulation the efficiency was higher, and its average efficiency was 69.7% (Figure 3). The efficiencies of residual color removal at the stage of ozonation and filtration on the activated carbon bed averaged 41.1% and 48.4%, respectively, with maximum values of 84.6% and 98.2%, respectively (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Reduction of color in the WTP technological system

Another parameter used for the ongoing control of NOM content at the WTP in Stary Sącz is the measurement of ultraviolet absorbance (UVA254nm) (Table 1, Figure 4), which was tested 517 to 869 times in the last 5 years. After the primary settling tanks, the UVA254nm values ranged from 0.123, an average of 0.302 to a maximum of 1.450 (with heavy rainfall). The removal efficiency ranged from an average of 14.9% to max. 91.3%. After Dyna Sand filters, the obtained absorbance values were from 0.070 to 0.257, with an average of 0.140 (average removal 52.5%, max. 93%). After ozonation, the obtained parameters were in the range of 0.047–0.193 with an average removal of 22.5% and max. 100%, and after carbon filters the values were 0.000–0.126, respectively, with an average removal of 11.1% and max. 95.8%.

Figure 4.

Reduction of UVA254nm in the WTP technological system

As an indicator of the level of organic compounds in water, also permanganatate oxygen demand is used, whereof content in water intended for human consumption is 5.0 mg·dm−3 according to the currently applicable standards [22]. The removability of permanganatate oxygen demand was on average 16.2% in pre-coagulation settling tanks, max. 100%, on average 45.6% on sand filters and max. 89.3%, for ozonation on average 31.6% and max. 100%, and for filtration on carbon filters on average 11.2% and max. 100%. The process of ground infiltration was highly effective in reducing oxidizability – on average 65.8% and max. 100% (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Reduction of permanganatate oxygen demand in the WTP technological system

In the collected water samples, the analyses of total iron and manganese were also carried out, the content of which in raw water could suggest the presence of these compounds in water subjected to treatment processes (Table 1). The test results of Fetotal and Mn content after coagulation and filtration processes on sand filters bespeak of very good removal of the metals, i.e. on average 86.1% for Fetotal and 96.4% for Mn (Figure 6, Figure 7). The removability after carbon filters is also high and averages 40.9% for Fetotal and as much as 98% for Mn (Figure 6, Figure 7). In the case of ground infiltration, the effectiveness was also high and a similar percentage of removal and similar final parameters were obtained as in the case of high-efficiency processes used at the WTP. The average removal was 92.2% for Fe and 99.4% for Mn. The natural processes of oxidation and reduction taking place in the layer of the biological slow filter, which is the ground layer, are characterized by very high efficiency of water purification.

Figure 6.

Reduction of Fetotal in the WTP technological system

Figure 7.

Reduction of Mn in the WTP technological system

The results of bacteria removal analyses in the WTP technological system are presented in Table 2. After pre-coagulation and filtration on Dyna Sand filters, coli group bacteria, Enteroccocus faecalis and Clostridium perfringens were removed with an average efficiency of 91.9% to 97.5%. After ground infiltration, the average removal rate of all types of the tested bacteria was high and amounted to 99.9% each time. The disinfection with UV rays and chlorine gas yielded 100% removal of microorganisms in the water treated at the WTP.

Reduction of bacteria in the WTP technological system

Indicator Unit sand filters disinfection ground infiltration
% reduction % reduction % reduction
coli group bacteria min. 20.0 100.0 98.4
av. 93.3 100.0 99.9
max. 100.0 100.0 100.0
Enterococcus faecalis min. 32.1 100.0 95.0
av. 91.9 100.0 99.9
max. 100.0 100.0 100.0
Clostridium perfringens min. 72.2 100.0 96.9
av. 97.5 100.0 99.9
max. 100.0 100.0 100.0

Both high-efficiency technological processes and ground infiltration are excellent barriers to periodically raised parameters of turbidity, color, UVA254nm, permanganatate oxygen demand, metals and metalloids. Each time, at the dynamically operating WTP in Stary Sącz, the tested samples of the treated water met all EU and national legal standards for water intended for human consumption and were within their lower limits.

SUMMARY

The carried out studies and analyses have demonstrated that the technological processes introduced at the WTP in Stary Sącz are appropriately matched to the variable water quality of the Dunajec mountain river. Each time, the results of the tests of water treated at the WTP yield the results close to zero or equal to zero, which bespeaks their high efficiency. The effectiveness of the processes of coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation and filtration on sand beds in removing turbidity, larger fractions of NOM, partly metals and metalloids from water is confirmed by researchers [5, 7].

The pre-treatment processes with the filtration process and the oxidation process through ozonation effectively reduce the above-standard parameters of raw water and they additionally support the subsequent removal processes of colloidal particles, smaller organics, metals and metalloids on activated carbon and microorganisms (disinfection processes with UV rays and chlorine gas). Researchers Hoslett et al. [8] state that adsorption with granular activated carbon in combination with oxidation is one of the best methods of removing NOM (including the hydrophilic fraction).

The high technological regime for conducting preliminary processes (high percentage efficiency of turbidity and color removal) at the stage of volumetric coagulation settling tanks, Dyna Sand filters and preliminary ozonation processes, additionally contributes to a long-term operation of carbon filters, whose period of correct operation without regeneration has been extended from approx. 4 to 6 years (first regeneration after 6 years).

The results of the tests and analyses of the technological systems also allowed for the assessment of the operation of the infiltration pool system with ground infiltration, which can successfully compete with other high-efficiency processes used in the WTP. Kowal & Świderska-Bróż [21] confirm the high effectiveness of infiltration in removing physico-chemical and bacteriological indicators from water. They state that infiltration in the ground is a natural method of water treatment, which, in the current widespread shortage of water resources, should be used more often [21].

The processes of double disinfection with UV rays and chlorine gas each time ensure 100% certainty involving the removal of microorganisms from water subjected to the processes. The primary processes of volumetric coagulation and filtration on a dynamic bed with contact coagulation in Dyna Sand filters together with the processes of ozonation with the filtration on activated carbon effectively prepare water for the final stages of disinfection by removing turbidity and NOM from it. Only water free of turbidity and organic matter can be effectively subjected to physical disinfection with UV rays and chemical disinfection with chlorine gas. Particulate-free water with low turbidity increases the penetration efficiency of UV rays, which effectively inactivate genetic material unable to continue replication and/or kill bacteria and viruses. Reducing the content of organic matter in water subjected to disinfection processes affects both the effectiveness of the process and reduces the formation of disinfection by-products such as THMs.

CONCLUSIONS

The technological processes used at the WTP in Stary Sącz effectively remove turbidity, color, UVA254nm, permanganatate oxygen demand, Fetotal, Mn, coliform bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis and Clostridium Perfringens from the surface and underground water.

The processes responsible in WTP mainly for turbidity removal are volumetric coagulation processes in vertical settling tanks (average reduction of 42.4% and maximum reduction of 99.6%) and filtration on DynaSand filters (reduction from 63.3% to 99.6% %, with an average of 93.2%). At the stage of ozonation and carbon filters, turbidity was additionally reduced by an average of 19.0%.

The color of the water is reduced mainly by Dyna Sand filters (average 69.7%) and in ozonation and filtration processes on an activated carbon bed (average reduction 41.1% and 48.4%, respectively; maximum reduction 84.6% and 98.2%).

UVA254nm was reduced to a high degree by pre-coagulation in sedimentation tanks and contact coagulation in Dyna Sand filters (average reduction 52.5%, max. 93%). As a result of the ozonation process, an additional reduction of 22.5% on average and max. 100%, and after filtration on activated carbon an average of 11.1% and max. 95.8%.

The reduction of permanganatate oxygen demand on vertical settling tanks was 16.2%, while on sand filters it was much higher (average 45.6% and max. 89.3%). The process of ozonation and filtration on activated carbon allowed for an additional reduction of the permanganate index (respectively, on average 31.6%, max. 100%; on average 11.2%, max. 100%).

The results of Fetotal and Mn content tests after coagulation and filtration processes on sand filters prove very good metals removal, i.e. on average 86.1% for Fetotal and 96.4% for Mn. After carbon filters, the reduction is also high and averages 40.9% for Fetotal and as much as 98% for Mn.

Initial treatment processes in vertical settling tanks and subsequent filtration processes on DynaSand filters have demonstrated very high efficiency in removing coliform bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis and Clostridium perfringens (average 91.9% and max. 97.5%). Double disinfection processes with UV rays and chlorine gas give 100% effectiveness in removing bacteria each time.

The analyzes have demonstrated that in the case of infiltration in the ground, the effectiveness of removing physico-chemical and bacteriological parameters was high and comparable to the high-efficiency processes used in WTP. Turbidity was reduced with an efficiency comparable to that of rapid filtration (min. 74.3%, average 96.9% and max. 99.9%), as was the color of water (reduction min. 64.2%, average 86.9%, max. 99.8%), UVA254 and permanganatate oxygen demand. The average removal of iron and manganese was 92.2% and 99.4%, respectively, while the average removal of all types of tested bacteria was 99.9% each time.

Effectively conducted pre-treatment processes in vertical settling tanks, filtration and ozonation allowed to extend the life of carbon filters to 6 years.

eISSN:
2720-6947
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Architecture and Design, Architecture, Architects, Buildings