Otwarty dostęp

Behavioural Assessment on Influence of Adjacently Placed Strip Footings at Different Embedment Level

Anupkumar G. Ekbote

Anupkumar G. Ekbote

Department of Civil Engineering, BMS Institute of Technology and ManagementBengaluru, India
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ekbote, Anupkumar G.
, 
Lohitkumar Nainegali

Lohitkumar Nainegali

Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM)Dhanbad, Dhanbad, India
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Nainegali, Lohitkumar
, 
Puja Rajhans

Puja Rajhans

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Birla Institute of TechnologyRanchi, India
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Rajhans, Puja
 oraz 
M S Deepak

M S Deepak

Department of Civil Engineering, BMS Institute of Technology and ManagementBengaluru, India
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Deepak, M S
  
03 lut 2023
Behavioural Assessment on Influence of Adjacently Placed Strip Footings at Different Embedment Level's Cover Image
O artykule
Poprzedni artykuł
Następny artykuł
Zacytuj
Pobierz okładkę
Data publikacji: 03 lut 2023
Zakres stron: 93 - 103
Otrzymano: 03 lut 2022
Przyjęty: 18 paź 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acee-2022-0041
Słowa kluczowe
© 2022 Anupkumar G. Ekbote et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Figure 1

Geometrical representation of problem definition
Geometrical representation of problem definition

Figure 2

Discretisation of domain and boundary condition
Discretisation of domain and boundary condition

Figure 3

p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 0.5 and DR/B = 0.5
p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 0.5 and DR/B = 0.5

Figure 4

p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 0.5 and DR/B = 0.75
p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 0.5 and DR/B = 0.75

Figure 5

p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 0.5 and DR/B = 1.0
p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 0.5 and DR/B = 1.0

Figure 6

p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 1.0 and DR/B = 0.5
p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 1.0 and DR/B = 0.5

Figure 7

p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 1.0 and DR/B = 0.75
p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 1.0 and DR/B = 0.75

Figure 8

p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 1.0 and DR/B = 1.0
p-δ behaviour for DL/B = 1.0 and DR/B = 1.0

Figure 9

Variation of ξL and ξR with S/B for DL/B = 0.5 and DR/B = 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0.
Variation of ξL and ξR with S/B for DL/B = 0.5 and DR/B = 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0.

Figure 10

Variation of ξL and ξR with S/B for DL/B = 0.75 and DR/B = 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0.
Variation of ξL and ξR with S/B for DL/B = 0.75 and DR/B = 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0.

Figure 11

Variation of ξL and ξR with S/B for DL/B = 1.0 and DR/B = 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0.
Variation of ξL and ξR with S/B for DL/B = 1.0 and DR/B = 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0.

Figure 12

VTotal displacement contour for DL/B = 0.5 and DR/B = 0.75
VTotal displacement contour for DL/B = 0.5 and DR/B = 0.75

Mechanical properties of soil and varying parameters considered in the analysis

Mechanical properties of soil
Parameters Values
Young's Modulus (E), MPa 32
Poisson's ratio (υ) 0.3
Cohesion (c), kPa 2
Soil friction angle (ϕ), ° 30°
Unit weight (γ), kg/m3 1600
Dilatancy angle (ψ), ° 15°
Range of varying parameters
DL/B 0.50, 0.75, 1.0
DR/B 0.50, 0.75, 1.0
S/B 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Architektura i projektowanie, Architektura, Architekci, budynki
Kanał RSS czasopisma