[
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Desing-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.10.3102/0013189X11428813
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bertram, A. (2014). CoRes and PaP-eRs as a strategy for helping beginning primary teachers develop their pedagogical content knowledge. Educación Quimica, 25(3), 292–303.10.1016/S0187-893X(14)70545-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.10.3102/0013189X032001009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dann, H.-D. (1989). Subjektive Theorien als Basis erfolgreichen Handelns von Lehrkräften. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 2, 247–254.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dorlöchter, H., Krüger, U., Stiller, E., & Wiebusch, D. (2008). Zwischen Standards und individueller Könnerschaft – videogestützte Kompetenzentwicklung in der Lehrerausbildung. Der berufliche Bildungsweg, 8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: a look to the future. Journal of chemical education, 76(4), 548–554.10.1021/ed076p548
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groeben, N., Wahl, D., Schlee, J., & Scheele, B. (Eds.). (1988). Das Forschungsprogramm Subjektive Theorien: eine Einführung in die Psychologie des reflektierten Subjekts. Tübingen: Francke.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kind, V. (2004). Beyond Appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas. Retrieved 07.01.2018 http://www.rsc.org/learn-chemistry/resource/res00002202/beyond-appearances?cmpid=CMP00007478
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kleickmann, T., Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Blumberg, E., & Möller, K. (2007). Learning environments in primary school science. In M. Prenzel (Ed.), Studies on the educational quality of schools. The final report on the DFG Priority Programme (pp. 137-156). Münster: Waxmann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kroath, F. (1989). How do Teachers Change their Practical Theories? Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 59–69.10.1080/0305764890190108
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marohn, A. (2008). Schülervorstellungen zum Lösen und Sieden. Der mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht, 61(8), 451–457.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marohn, A., & Rohrbach, F. (2013). Professionalisierung in der Lehrerausbildung. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines am Forschenden Lernen orientierten Seminars zum Thema Schülervorstellungen im Chemieunterricht. Chimica et ceterae artes rerum naturae didacticae, 38(105), 21–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting Educational Design Research London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203818183
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morrison, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Science Teachers’ Diagnosis and Understanding of Students’ Preconceptions. Science education, 87(6), 849–867.10.1002/sce.10092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paulson, F. L., & Paulson, P. R. (1990). How Do Portfolios Measure Up? A Cognitive Model for Assessing Portfolios. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Northwest Evaluation Association, Union, WA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What Makes a Portfolio a Portfolio?. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60–63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accomodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptional Change. Science education, 66(2), 211–227.10.1002/sce.3730660207
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richardson, V. (1996). The Role of Attitudes and Beliefs Learning to Teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 102–119). New York: Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rohrbach, F., & Marohn, A. (2016). Schülervorstellungen: Forschend verstehen und handeln Lernen: Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik (GDCP).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rohrbach-Lochner, F. (2017). Design-Based Research zur Weiterentwicklung der chemiedidaktischen Lehrerausbildung zu Schülervorstellungen: Entwicklung und Evaluation eines an Forschendem Lernen orientierten Seminarkonzepts. Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster (submitted Dezember 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt, H.-J., Marohn, A., & Harrison, A. G. (2007). Factors that prevent learning in electrochemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 258–283.10.1002/tea.20118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A Revisionist Theory of Conceptual Change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 147–175). New York: State University of New York Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uhren, S., Ralle, B., & Di Fuccia, D.-S. (2013). Zum Umgang von Lehrkräften mit alternativen Schülervorstellungen. Chimica et ceterae artes rerum naturae didacticae, 38(105), 51-67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational Design Research. London, New York Routledge.10.4324/9780203088364
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Humboldt, W. (1810). “Über die innere und äußere Organisation der höheren wissenschaftlichen Anstalten in Berlin”. In B. Gebhardt (Ed.), Wilhelm von Humboldts Politische Denkschriften. Berlin: B. Behrs Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wildt, J. (2009). Forschendes Lernen: Lernen im “Format” der Forschung. Journal Hochschuldidaktik, 20(2), 4–7.
]Search in Google Scholar
