[Alderson, D. L. (2008). “Catching the “Network Science” Bug: Insight and Opportunity for the Operations Researcher.” Operations Research 56, 5: 1047-1065.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aviv, R., Z. Erlich and G. Ravid (2008). “Analysis of Transitivity and Reciprocity in Online Distance Learning Networks.” Connections 28, 1: 27-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barnes, R. and T. Burkett (2010). “Structural Redundancy and Multiplicity in Corporate Networks.” Connections 30, 2: 4-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barnett, G. A. and J. A. Danowski (1992). “The Structure of Communication: A Network Analysis of the International Communication Association.” Human Communication Research 19: 264-285.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgatti, S. P. and M. G. Everett (1997). “Network Analysis of 2-Mode Data.” Social Networks 19: 243-269.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett and L. C. Freeman (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cho, H. and J-S. Lee (2008). “Collaborative Information Seeking in Intercultural Computer-Mediated Communication Groups: Testing the Influence of Social Context Using Social Network Analysis.” Communication Research 35: 548-573.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chung, C. J., S. Lee, G. A. Barnett and J. H. Kim (2009). “A Comparative Network Analysis of the Korean Society of Journalism and Communication Studies (KSJCS) and the International Communication Association (ICA) in the Era of Hybridization.” Asian Journal of Communication 19: 170-191.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chung, C. J. and H. W. Park (2010). “Textual Analysis of a Political Message: The Inaugural Addresses of Two Korean Presidents.” Social Science Information 49: 215-239.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chung, F. and L. Lu (2001). “The Diameter of Sparse Random Graphs.” Advances in Applied Mathematics 26: 257-279.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crowe, J. A. (2007). “In Search of a Happy Medium: How the Structure of Interorganizational Networks Influence Community Economic Development Strategies.” Social Networks 29: 469-488.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, A., B. B. Gardner and M. R. Gardner (1941). Deep South: A Sociological Anthropological Study of Caste and Class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.]Search in Google Scholar
[Doerfel, M. L. and G. A. Barnett (1999). “A Semantic Network Analysis of the International Communication Association.” Human Communication Research 25: 589-603.]Search in Google Scholar
[Erdös, P. and A. Rényi (1960). “On the Evolution of Random Graphs.” Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences 5: 17-61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Faust, K. (1997). “Centrality in Affiliation Networks.” Social Networks 19: 157-191.]Search in Google Scholar
[Faust, K. (2008). “Triadic Configurations in Limited Choice Sociometric Networks: Empirical and Theoretical Results.” Social Networks 30: 273-282.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrer i Cancho, R. and R. V. Solé (2001). “The Small world of Human Language.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 268: 2261-2265.]Search in Google Scholar
[Field, S., K. A. Frank, K. Schiller, C. Riegle-Crumb and C. Muller (2006). “Identifying Positions from Affiliation Networks: Preserving the Duality of People and Events.” Social Networks 28: 97-123.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilbert, E. N. (1959). “Random Graphs.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30: 1141-1144.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guenther, W. C. (1973). Concepts of Statistical Inference (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kang, S. M. (2007). “Equicentrality and Network Centralization: A Micro-Macro Linkage.” Social Networks 29: 585-601.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ko, K., K. J. Lee and C. Park (2008). “Rethinking Preferential Attachment Scheme: Degree Centrality versus Closeness Centrality.” Connections 28, 1: 4-15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koenig, T., R. Gogel and J. Sonquist (1979). “Models of the Significance of Interlocking Corporate Directorates.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 38: 173-186.]Search in Google Scholar
[Latapy, M., C. Magnien and N. Del Vecchio (2008). “Basic Notions for the Analysis of Large Two-Mode Networks.” Social Networks 30: 31-48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, S. (2008). “Understanding the Nature of Citation: Examination of Structure in Citation Analysis and its Application to Communication Discipline in the Information Age.” Doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Amherst, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mizruchi, M. S. and E. J. Neuman (2008). “The Effect of Density on the Level of Bias in the Network Autocorrelation Model.” Social Networks 30: 190-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moody, J. (2004). “The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999.” American Sociological Review 69: 213-238.]Search in Google Scholar
[Park, H. W. and M. Thelwall (2008). “Developing Network Indicators for Ideological Landscapes from the Political Blogosphere in South Korea.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13: 856-879.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P., K. Sharpe, G. L. Robins and P. E. Pattison (2009). “Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models for Affiliation Networks.” Social Networks 31: 12-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wonnacott, T. H. and R. J. Wonnacott (1990). Introductory Statistics (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhou, D., and E. Heineken (2009). “The Use of Metaphors in Academic Communication: Traps or Treasures.” Ibérica 18: 23-42.]Search in Google Scholar
