This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bird, A. F. 1968. Changes associated with parasitism in nematodes, iii. Ultrastructure of the egg shell, larval cuticle and contents of the subventral glands in Meloidogyne javanica, with some observations on hatching. Journal of Parasitology 54:475–489.BirdA. F.1968.Changes associated with parasitism in nematodes, iii. Ultrastructure of the egg shell, larval cuticle and contents of the subventral glands in Meloidogyne javanica, with some observations on hatching.54:475–489.10.2307/3277069Search in Google Scholar
Brito, J., Powers, T. O., Mullin, P. G., Inserra, R. N. and Dickson, D. W. 2004. Morphological and molecular characterization of Meloidogyne mayaguensis isolates from Florida. Journal of Nematology 36:232–240.BritoJ.PowersT. O.MullinP. G.InserraR. N. and DicksonD. W.2004.Morphological and molecular characterization of Meloidogyne mayaguensis isolates from Florida.36:232–240.Search in Google Scholar
Castagnone-Sereno, P. 2012. Meloidogyne enterolobii (= M. mayaguensis): profile of an emerging, highly pathogenic, root-knot nematode species. Nematology 14:133–138.Castagnone-SerenoP.2012.Meloidogyne enterolobii (= M. mayaguensis): profile of an emerging, highly pathogenic, root-knot nematode species.14:133–138.10.1163/156854111X601650Search in Google Scholar
Curtis, R. H., Robinson, A. F. and Perry, R. N. 2009. “Hatch and host location”, in Perry, R. N., Moens, M. and Starr, J. L. (Eds), Root-knot nematodes CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp. 139–162.CurtisR. H.RobinsonA. F. and PerryR. N.2009. “Hatch and host location”, inPerryR. N.MoensM. and StarrJ. L.(Eds),CAB International,Oxfordshire, pp.139–162.10.1079/9781845934927.0139Search in Google Scholar
Di Vito, M., Greco, N. and Zaccheo, G. 1985. On the host range of Meloidogyne artiellia. Nematologia Mediterranea 13:207–212.Di VitoM.GrecoN. and ZaccheoG.1985.On the host range of Meloidogyne artiellia.13:207–212.Search in Google Scholar
Di Vito, M., Greco, N. and Carella, A. 1986. The effect of Meloidogyne incognita and importance of the inoculum on yield of eggplant. Journal of Nematology 18:487–490.Di VitoM.GrecoN. and CarellaA.1986.The effect of Meloidogyne incognita and importance of the inoculum on yield of eggplant.18:487–490.Search in Google Scholar
Djian-Caporalino, C., Molinari, S., Palloix, A., Ciancio, A., Fazari, A., Marteu, N. and Castagnone-Sereno, P. 2011. The reproductive potential of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita is affected by selection for virulence against major resistance genes from tomato and pepper. European Journal of Plant Pathology 131:431–440.Djian-CaporalinoC.MolinariS.PalloixA.CiancioA.FazariA.MarteuN. and Castagnone-SerenoP.2011.The reproductive potential of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita is affected by selection for virulence against major resistance genes from tomato and pepper.131:431–440.10.1007/s10658-011-9820-4Search in Google Scholar
Dong, W., Holbrook, C. C., Timper, P., Brenneman, T. B. and Mullinix, B. G. 2007. Comparison of methods for assessing resistance to Meloidogyne arenaria in peanut. Journal of Nematology 39:169–175.DongW.HolbrookC. C.TimperP.BrennemanT. B. and MullinixB. G.2007.Comparison of methods for assessing resistance to Meloidogyne arenaria in peanut.39:169–175.Search in Google Scholar
Faske, T. R. and Hurd, K. 2015. Sensitivity of Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis to fluopyram. Journal of Nematology 47:316–321.FaskeT. R. and HurdK.2015.Sensitivity of Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis to fluopyram.47:316–321.Search in Google Scholar
Giné, A., González, C., Serrano, L. and Sorribas, F. J. 2017. Population dynamics of Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber grafted onto the Cucurbita hybrid RS841 or ungrafted and yield losses under protected cultivation. European Journal of Plant Pathology 148:795–805.GinéA.GonzálezC.SerranoL. and SorribasF. J.2017.Population dynamics of Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber grafted onto the Cucurbita hybrid RS841 or ungrafted and yield losses under protected cultivation.148:795–805.10.1007/s10658-016-1135-zSearch in Google Scholar
Giné, A., López-Gómez, M., Vela, M. D., Ornat, C., Talavera, M., Verdejo-Lucas, S. and Sorribas, F. J. 2014. Thermal requirements and population dynamics of root-knot nematodes on cucumber and yield losses under protected cultivation. Plant Pathology 63:14461453.GinéA.López-GómezM.VelaM. D.OrnatC.TalaveraM.Verdejo-LucasS. and SorribasF. J.2014.Thermal requirements and population dynamics of root-knot nematodes on cucumber and yield losses under protected cultivation.63:14461453.10.1111/ppa.12217Search in Google Scholar
Gómez-González, G., Márquez-Zequera, I., Cruz-Lachica, I., Osuna-García, L. A. and García-Estrada, R. S. 2020. First report of Meloidogyne enterolobii parasitizing cucumber in Sinaloa, Mexico. Plant Disease 104:1260.Gómez-GonzálezG.Márquez-ZequeraI.Cruz-LachicaI.Osuna-GarcíaL. A. and García-EstradaR. S.2020.First report of Meloidogyne enterolobii parasitizing cucumber in Sinaloa, Mexico.104:1260.10.1094/PDIS-09-19-1919-PDNSearch in Google Scholar
Greco, N. and Di Vito, M. 2009. “Population dynamics and damage levels”, in Perry, R. N., Moens, M. and Starr, J. L. (Eds), Root-knot Nematodes CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp. 246–269.GrecoN. and Di VitoM.2009. “Population dynamics and damage levels”, inPerryR. N.MoensM. and StarrJ. L. (Eds),CAB International,Oxfordshire, pp.246–269.10.1079/9781845934927.0246Search in Google Scholar
Hooper, D. J., Hallmann, J. and Subbotin, A. S. 2005. “Extraction, processing and detection of plant and soil nematodes”, In Luc, M., Bridge, J. and Sikora, R. A. (Eds), Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture 2nd ed, CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp. 53–86.HooperD. J.HallmannJ. and SubbotinA. S.2005. “Extraction, processing and detection of plant and soil nematodes”, InLucM.BridgeJ. and SikoraR. A. (Eds),2nd ed,CAB International,Oxfordshire, pp.53–86.Search in Google Scholar
Hussey, R. S. and Barker, K. R. 1973. A comparision of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp. including a new technique. Plant Disease Reporter 57:1025–1028.HusseyR. S. and BarkerK. R.1973.A comparision of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp. including a new technique.57:1025–1028.Search in Google Scholar
Kayani, M. Z., Mukhtar, T. and Hussain, M. A. 2016. Effects of southern root knot nematode population densities and plant age on growth and yield parameters of cucumber. Crop Protection 92:207–212.KayaniM. Z.MukhtarT. and HussainM. A.2016.Effects of southern root knot nematode population densities and plant age on growth and yield parameters of cucumber.92:207–212.10.1016/j.cropro.2016.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Kayani, M. Z., Mukhtar, T. and Hussain, M. A. 2018. Interaction between nematode inoculum density and plant age on growth and yield of cucumber and reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 50:897–902.KayaniM. Z.MukhtarT. and HussainM. A.2018.Interaction between nematode inoculum density and plant age on growth and yield of cucumber and reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita.50:897–902.10.17582/journal.pjz/2018.50.3.897.902Search in Google Scholar
McClure, M. A., Kruk, T. H. and Misaghi, I. 1973. A method for obtaining quantities of clean Meloidogyne eggs. Journal of Nematology 5:230.McClureM. A.KrukT. H. and MisaghiI.1973.A method for obtaining quantities of clean Meloidogyne eggs.5:230.Search in Google Scholar
Maleita, C. M., Curtis, R. H., Powers, S. J. and de O. Abrantes, I. M. 2012. Inoculum levels of Meloidogyne hispanica and M. javanica affect nematode reproduction, and growth of tomato genotypes. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 51:566–576.MaleitaC. M.CurtisR. H.PowersS. J. and de O. AbrantesI. M.2012.Inoculum levels of Meloidogyne hispanica and M. javanica affect nematode reproduction, and growth of tomato genotypes.51:566–576.Search in Google Scholar
Mishra, V., Abrol, G. S. and Dubey, N. 2018. “Sodium and calcium hypochlorite as postharvest disinfectants for fruits and vegetables”, In Siddiqui, M. W. (Ed.), Postharvest Disinfection of Fruits and Vegetables Academic Press, Sabour, pp. 253–272.MishraV.AbrolG. S. and DubeyN.2018. “Sodium and calcium hypochlorite as postharvest disinfectants for fruits and vegetables”, InSiddiquiM. W. (Ed.),Academic Press,Sabour, pp.253–272.10.1016/B978-0-12-812698-1.00014-5Search in Google Scholar
Stetina, S. R., McGawley, E. C. and Russin, J. S. 1997. Extraction of root-associated Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis. Journal of Nematology 29:209–215.StetinaS. R.McGawleyE. C. and RussinJ. S.1997.Extraction of root-associated Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis.29:209–215.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, S. H., Schroeder, J., Kenney, M. J. and Murray, L. W. 1997. Meloidogyne incognita inoculum source affects host suitability and growth of yellow nutsedge and chile pepper. Journal of Nematology 29:404–410.ThomasS. H.SchroederJ.KenneyM. J. and MurrayL. W.1997.Meloidogyne incognita inoculum source affects host suitability and growth of yellow nutsedge and chile pepper.29:404–410.Search in Google Scholar
Vovlas, N., Mifsud, D., Landa, B. B. and Castillo, P. 2005a. Pathogenicity of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica on potato. Plant Pathology 54:657–664.VovlasN.MifsudD.LandaB. B. and CastilloP.2005a.Pathogenicity of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica on potato.54:657–664.10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01244.xSearch in Google Scholar
Vovlas, N., Rapoport, H. F., Jimenez-Diaz, R. M. and Castillo, P. 2005b. Differences in feeding sites induced by root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp., in chickpea. Phytopathology 95:368–375.VovlasN.RapoportH. F.Jimenez-DiazR. M. and CastilloP.2005b.Differences in feeding sites induced by root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp., in chickpea.95:368–375.10.1094/PHYTO-95-036818943038Search in Google Scholar
Vrain, T. C. 1977. A technique for the collection of larvae of Meloidogyne spp. and a comparison of eggs and larvae as inocula. Journal of Nematology 9:249–251.VrainT. C.1977.A technique for the collection of larvae of Meloidogyne spp. and a comparison of eggs and larvae as inocula.9:249–251.Search in Google Scholar