Callender S, Race R, Paykoc ZV. Hypersensitivity to transfused blood. Br Med J 1945;2:83.10.1136/bmj.2.4411.83Search in Google Scholar
Callender ST, Race RR.A serological and geneticalstudy of multiple antibodies formed in response to blood transfusion by a patient with lupus erythematosus diffusus. Ann Eugen 1946;13:102–17.10.1111/j.1469-1809.1946.tb02346.xSearch in Google Scholar
Mainwaring UR, Pickles MM.A further case of antiLutheran immunization with some studies on its capacity for human sensitization. J Clin Pathol 1948;1:292–4.10.1136/jcp.1.5.292Search in Google Scholar
Shaw S, Mourant AE, Iken EW. Hypersplenism with anti-Lutheran antibody following transfusion. Lancet 1954;2:170–1.10.1016/S0140-6736(54)90141-5Search in Google Scholar
Gozenbach R, Haasig A, Rosin S. Über posttransfu- sionelle bildung von anti-Lutheran antikorpern. Die haufigkeit des Lutheran-antigens Lua in der berolkerung nord-west und mitteleuropas. Blut 1955;272–4.10.1007/BF01630414Search in Google Scholar
Greenwalt TJ, Saski T.The Lutheran blood groups: a second example of anti-Lub and three further examples of anti-Lua. Blood 1957;12:998–1003.10.1182/blood.V12.11.998.998Search in Google Scholar
Francis BJ, Hatcher DE. Hemolytic disease of the newborn apparently caused by anti-Lua.Transfusion 1961;1:248–50.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1961.tb00050.x13701232Search in Google Scholar
Cutbush M, Chanarin I.The expected blood group antibody, anti-Lub. Nature 1956;178:855–6.10.1038/178855b013369558Search in Google Scholar
Shaw MA, Leak MR, Daniels GL, Green CA,Tippett P. The rare Lutheran blood group phenotype Lu(a–b–): a genetic study.Ann Hum Genet 1984;48:229–37.10.1111/j.1469-1809.1984.tb01019.x6465841Search in Google Scholar
Rowe GP, Gale SA, Daniels GL, Green CA,Tippett P.A study on Lu-null families in South Wales. Ann Hum Genet 1992;56:267–72.10.1111/j.1469-1809.1992.tb01151.x1449238Search in Google Scholar
Mourant AE,Kopec AC,Domaniewska-Sobczak K.The distribution of human blood groups and other polymorphisms. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1976.Search in Google Scholar
Yung CH, Chow MP,Hy HY, Mou LL, Lyou JY, Lee TD. Blood group phenotypes in Taiwan. Transfusion 1989;29:233–5.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1989.29389162730.x2922792Search in Google Scholar
Issitt PD, Anstee DJ. Applied blood group serology. 4th ed. Durham, NC: Montgomery Scientific Publications, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Mohr J.A search for linkage between the Lutheran blood group and other hereditary characters. Acta Path Microbiol Scand 1951;28:207–10.10.1111/j.1699-0463.1951.tb03688.x14829286Search in Google Scholar
Mohr J. Estimation of linkage between the Lutheran and the Lewis blood groups. Acta Path Microbiol Scand 1951;29:339–42.10.1111/j.1699-0463.1951.tb00136.x14933035Search in Google Scholar
Williams AF, Barclay AN.The immunoglobulin superfamily—domains for cell surface recognition. Ann Rev Immunol 1988;6:381–405.10.1146/annurev.iy.06.040188.0021213289571Search in Google Scholar
Crawford MN, Greenwalt TJ, Sasaki T, Tippett PA, Sanger R, Race RR.The phenotype Lu(a–b–) together with unconventional Kidd groups in one family. Transfusion 1961;1:228–32.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1961.tb00047.xSearch in Google Scholar
Tippett P.A case of suppressed Lua and Lub antigens. Vox Sang 1971;20:378–80.Search in Google Scholar
Taliano V, Guevin R-M, Tippett P.The genetics of a dominant inhibitor of the Lutheran antigens. Vox Sang 1973;24:42–7.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1973.tb03855.x4682512Search in Google Scholar
Stanbury A, Francis B.The Lu(a–b–) phenotype: an additional example.Vox Sang 1967;13:441–3.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1967.tb03788.x6069259Search in Google Scholar
Darnborough J, Firth R, Giles M, Goldsmith KLG, Crawford MN.A “new” antibody anti-LuaLub and two further examples of the genotype Lu(a–b–). Nature 1963;198:796.10.1038/198796a014025138Search in Google Scholar
Brown F, Simpson S,Cornwall S, Moore BPL, Oyen R, Marsh WL.The recessive Lu(a–b–) phenotype.A family study.Vox Sang 1974;26:259–64.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1974.tb02694.x4836779Search in Google Scholar
Myhre B,Thompson M,Anson C, Fishkin B,Carter PK. A further example of the recessive Lu(a–b–) pheno- type.Vox Sang 1975;29:66–8.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1975.tb00478.x1146276Search in Google Scholar
Daniels G. Human blood groups. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science, 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Norman PC,Tippett P, Beal RW.An Lu(a–b–) phenotype caused by an X-linked recessive gene.Vox Sang 1986;51:49–52.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1986.tb00208.x3739323Search in Google Scholar
Winkler MM, Hamilton JR. Previously tested donors eliminated to determine rare phenotype frequencies (abstract). Joint Congr Int Soc Blood Transfus and AABB, 1990:158.Search in Google Scholar
Udden MM, Umeda M, Hirano Y, Marcus DM. New abnormalities in the morphology,cell surface receptors, and electrolyte metabolism of In(Lu) erythrocytes. Blood 1987;69:52–7.10.1182/blood.V69.1.52.52Search in Google Scholar
Bove JR, Allen FH, Chiewsilp P, Marsh WL, Cleghorn TW.Anti-Lu4: a new antibody related to the Lutheran blood group system.Vox Sang 1971;21:302–10.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1971.tb04785.x5118510Search in Google Scholar
Marsh WL.Anti-Lu5, anti-Lu6 and anti-Lu7.Three antibodies defining high frequency antigens related to the Lutheran blood group system. Transfusion 1972;12:27–34.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1972.tb00018.xSearch in Google Scholar
McIlroy M, McCreary J, Stroup M. Anti-Lu8, an antibody recognizing another Lutheran-related antigen. Vox Sang 1972;23:455–7.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1972.tb03835.x5077743Search in Google Scholar
Molthan L, Crawford MN, Marsh WL, Allen FH. Lu9, another new antigen of the Lutheran blood group system.Vox Sang 1973;24:468–71.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1973.tb03487.x4691240Search in Google Scholar
Gralnick MA, Goldfinger D, Hatfield PA, Reid ME, Marsh WL. Anti-Lu11: another antibody defining a high-frequency antigen related to the Lutheran
blood group system.Vox Sang 1974;27:52–6.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1974.tb02388.x4850590Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair M, Buchanan DI,Tippett P, Sanger R.Another antibody related to the Lutheran blood group system (Much).Vox Sang 1973;25:156–61.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1973.tb04823.x4724954Search in Google Scholar
Daniels G, Khalid G. Identification by immunoblotting, of the structures carrying Lutheran and paraLutheran blood group antigens. Vox Sang 1989; 57:137–41.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1989.tb01151.x2781741Search in Google Scholar
Shirey RS, Oyen R, Heeb KN, Kickler TS, Ness PM. 15Cr radiolabeled survival studies in a patient with anti-Lu12 (abstract). Transfusion 1988;28(Suppl): 375.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1988.28188127959.x3341072Search in Google Scholar
Marsh Wl, Johnson CL, Mueller KA, Mannessier L, Rouger P. First example of the Wj-negative phenotype (abstract).Transfusion 1983;23:423.Search in Google Scholar
Judd WJ, Marsh WL, Oyen R, et al. Anti-Lu14: a Lutheran antibody defining the product of an allele at the Lu8 blood group locus.Vox Sang 1977;32:214–9.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1977.tb00632.x857422Search in Google Scholar
Marsh WL, Oyen R, Rosso M, Gruber D, Cooper J.A second example of anti-Lu14. Transfusion 1976; 16:633–5.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1976.16677060247.x996923Search in Google Scholar
Sabo B, Pancoska C, Myers M,Thoreson S, McCreary J, Stroup M. Antibodies against two high frequency antigens of the Lutheran System. Lu:2 and Lu:16, made by Lu(a+b–) black females (abstract). Transfusion 1980;20:630.Search in Google Scholar
Turner C. Anti-Lu17 (anti-Pataracchia). A new antibody to a high frequency antigen in the Lutheran system. Canad J Med Tech. 1979;41:43–7.Search in Google Scholar
Salmon C, Salmon D, Liberge G, André R, Tippett P, Sanger R.Un nouvel antigène de groupe sanguin éry- thocytaire presént chez 80% des sujets de race blanche. Nouv Rev Franc Hémat 1961;1:649–61.Search in Google Scholar
Frandson S, Atkins CJ, Moulds M, Poole J, Crawford MN, Tippett P. Anti-Aub: the antithetical antibody to anti-Aua.Vox Sang 1989;56:54–6.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1989.tb03049.x2644738Search in Google Scholar
Daniels GL, LePence PY, Rouger P, Salmon C,Tippett P.The red cell antigens Aua and Aub belong to the Lutheran system.Vox Sang 1991;60:191–2.Search in Google Scholar
Zelinski T, Kaita H, Coghlan G, Philipps S.Assignment of the Auberger red cell antigen polymorphism to the Lutheran blood group system: genetic justifica- tion.Vox Sang 1991;61:275–6.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1991.tb00959.x1776245Search in Google Scholar
Levene C, Gekker K, Poole J, Goldfarb A, DeCosta Y, Manny N. Lu20, a new high incidence ‘para’-Lu antigen in the Lutheran blood group system (abstract). Rev Paulista Med 1992;110:111–3.Search in Google Scholar
Crawford MN. In: Pierce SR, Macpherson CR, eds. Blood group systems: Duffy, Kidd and Lutheran. Arlington,VA:American Association of Blood Banks, 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Mollison PL, Engelfriet CP, Contreras M. Blood transfusion in clinical medicine. 9th ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Hardman JT, Beck ML. Hemagglutination in capillar- ies:correlation with blood group specificity and IgG subclass.Transfusion 1981;21:343–6.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1981.21381201810.x7233518Search in Google Scholar
Molthan L, Crawford MN.Three examples of anti-Lub and related data.Transfusion 1966;6:584–9.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1966.tb04782.x5951618Search in Google Scholar
Castillo L, Leveque C. Delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction due to anti-Lua (abstract). Joint Congr Int Soc Blood Transfus and AABB, 1990:162.Search in Google Scholar
Parsons SF, Mallinson G, Judson PA,Anstee DJ,Tanner MJA, Daniels GL. Evidence that the Lub blood group antigen is located on red cell membrane glycoproteins of 85 and 78 kD.Transfusion 1987;27:61–3.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1987.27187121477.x3810828Search in Google Scholar
Poole J. Review: the Lutheran blood group system— 1991. Immunohematology 1992; 8:1–8.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-973Search in Google Scholar
