<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The inherent tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity in the detection of unexplained antibodies has been the objective of many studies, editorials, and journal articles. Many publications note that no method is capable of detecting all clinically significant antibodies while avoiding all clinically insignificant antibodies. This study describes the frequency of nonspecific reactivity and unexplained reactivity in solid-phase testing, along with the subsequent development of specific antibodies (Abs). In this study, nonspecific reactivity (NS) is defined as method-specific panreactivity detected by solid-phase testing only, with no reactivity in other methods. Unexplained reactivity (UR) is defined as reactivity present and detectable in all test methods after all clinically significant antibodies were ruled out following a standard antibody identification algorithm using selected cell panels. This retrospective study evaluated antibody detection tests of patients at a single center for 2 years using two automated solid-phase instruments that used the same three-cell antibody detection test. Antibody identification was performed with solid-phase panels supplemented with a polyethylene glycol tube method as needed. Of the 1934 (5%) samples with a positive antibody detection test, 29 had unavailable work-up data, leaving 1905 (98.5%) samples eligible for inclusion in the study. The data revealed the following: Ab only 999 (52.4%); UR only 429 (22.5%); Ab and UR 227 (11.9%); NS only 206 (10.8%); Ab and NS 24 (1.3%); UR and NS 14 (0.7%); and Ab, UR, and NS 6 (0.3%). Patients with a positive follow-up antibody detection test had UR and NS replaced with a specific Ab in 23 of 656 UR (3%) and 8 of 230 NS (3%) cases, respectively. Additionally, six patients with UR developed a specific Ab along with persistent UR, and no patients with persistent NS developed a specific Ab. The study concluded that both UR and NS can be encountered in solid-phase testing, and both UR and NS can persist in follow-up testing. Specific Ab was observed to replace UR in a few patients. <italic><bold>Immunohematology</bold></italic> <bold>2018;34:93–97.</bold></p>
</abstract>

The inherent tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity in the detection of unexplained antibodies has been the objective of many studies, editorials, and journal articles. Many publications note that no method is capable of detecting all clinically significant antibodies while avoiding all clinically insignificant antibodies. This study describes the frequency of nonspecific reactivity and unexplained reactivity in solid-phase testing, along with the subsequent development of specific antibodies (Abs). In this study, nonspecific reactivity (NS) is defined as method-specific panreactivity detected by solid-phase testing only, with no reactivity in other methods. Unexplained reactivity (UR) is defined as reactivity present and detectable in all test methods after all clinically significant antibodies were ruled out following a standard antibody identification algorithm using selected cell panels. This retrospective study evaluated antibody detection tests of patients at a single center for 2 years using two automated solid-phase instruments that used the same three-cell antibody detection test. Antibody identification was performed with solid-phase panels supplemented with a polyethylene glycol tube method as needed. Of the 1934 (5%) samples with a positive antibody detection test, 29 had unavailable work-up data, leaving 1905 (98.5%) samples eligible for inclusion in the study. The data revealed the following: Ab only 999 (52.4%); UR only 429 (22.5%); Ab and UR 227 (11.9%); NS only 206 (10.8%); Ab and NS 24 (1.3%); UR and NS 14 (0.7%); and Ab, UR, and NS 6 (0.3%). Patients with a positive follow-up antibody detection test had UR and NS replaced with a specific Ab in 23 of 656 UR (3%) and 8 of 230 NS (3%) cases, respectively. Additionally, six patients with UR developed a specific Ab along with persistent UR, and no patients with persistent NS developed a specific Ab. The study concluded that both UR and NS can be encountered in solid-phase testing, and both UR and NS can persist in follow-up testing. Specific Ab was observed to replace UR in a few patients. Immunohematology 2018;34:93–97.

Method-specific and unexplained reactivity in automated solid-phase testing and their association with specific antibodies

Immunohematology

The inherent tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity in the detection of unexplained antibodies has been the objective of many studies, editorials, and...

Method-specific and unexplained reactivity in automated solid-phase testing and their association with specific antibodies

Article Category: Original Report

Data publikacji: 16 paź 2019

Zakres stron: 93 - 97

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2018-015

© 2018 M.E. Harach, et al., published by Sciendo