Zacytuj

Berger, P. L. (2004). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. Anchor Books. BergerP. L. 2004 Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective Anchor Books Search in Google Scholar

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). Secularization and pluralism. Internationales Jahrbuch für Religionssoziologie, 2, 73–81. BergerP. L. LuckmannT. 1966 Secularization and pluralism Internationales Jahrbuch für Religionssoziologie 2 73 81Search in Google Scholar

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2008). La construcción social de la realidad. (S. Zuleta, Trad.). Amorrortu. BergerP. L. LuckmannT. 2008 La construcción social de la realidad ZuletaS. Trad. Amorrortu Search in Google Scholar

Borgmann, A. (2013). So who am I really? Personal identity in the age of the Internet. AI and Society, (28), 15–20. BorgmannA. 2013 So who am I really? Personal identity in the age of the Internet AI and Society 28 15 20 Search in Google Scholar

Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700. BrundidgeJ. 2010 Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks Journal of Communication 60 4 680 700 Search in Google Scholar

Di Paolo, E. A., & De Jaegher, H. (2022). Enactive ethics: Difference becoming participation. Topoi, 41(2), 241–256. Di PaoloE. A. De JaegherH. 2022 Enactive ethics: Difference becoming participation Topoi 41 2 241 256 Search in Google Scholar

Düringer, E.-M. (2021). The moral virtue of being understanding. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 24(4), 917–932. DüringerE.-M. 2021 The moral virtue of being understanding Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 4 917 932 Search in Google Scholar

Esteve-Del-Valle, M. (2022). Homophily and polarization in twitter political networks: A cross-country analysis. Media and Communication, 10(2). https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948 Esteve-Del-ValleM. 2022 Homophily and polarization in twitter political networks: A cross-country analysis Media and Communication 10 2 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948 Search in Google Scholar

Floridi, L. (2015). The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press. FloridiL. 2015 The Ethics of Information Oxford University Press Search in Google Scholar

Floridi, L. (2016). Faultless responsibility: On the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083), 20160112. FloridiL. 2016 Faultless responsibility: On the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374 2083 20160112 Search in Google Scholar

Floridi, L. (2017). Infraethics-on the conditions of possibility of morality. Philosophy of Technology, 30, 391–394. FloridiL. 2017 Infraethics-on the conditions of possibility of morality Philosophy of Technology 30 391 394Search in Google Scholar

Floridi, L. (2019). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press. FloridiL. 2019 The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design Oxford University Press Search in Google Scholar

Floridi, L. (2023). AI as agency without intelligence: On ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4358789 FloridiL. 2023 AI as agency without intelligence: On ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models SSRN Electronic Journal https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4358789 Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media and Society, 12(3), 347–364. GillespieT. 2010 The politics of ‘platforms’ New Media and Society 12 3 347 364Search in Google Scholar

Griselda Lopez, D. (2021). A phenomenological approach to the study of social distance. Human Studies, 44, 171–200. Griselda LopezD. 2021 A phenomenological approach to the study of social distance Human Studies 44 171 200Search in Google Scholar

Joas, H. (1997). G.H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought. In R. Meyer, Trad. (Ed.), Studies in contemporary German social thought. MIT Press. JoasH. 1997 G.H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought MeyerR. Trad. (Ed.) Studies in contemporary German social thought MIT Press Search in Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). Van Nostrand. LazarsfeldP. MertonR. K. 1954 Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis Freedom and control in modern society 18 66 Van Nostrand Search in Google Scholar

Marin, L. (2022). Enactive principles for the ethics of user interactions on social media: How to overcome systematic misunderstandings through shared meaning-making. Topoi, 41(2), 425–437. MarinL. 2022 Enactive principles for the ethics of user interactions on social media: How to overcome systematic misunderstandings through shared meaning-making Topoi 41 2 425 437Search in Google Scholar

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, (27), 415–44. McPhersonM. Smith-LovinL. CookJ. M. 2001 Birds of feather: Homophily in social networks Annual Review of Sociology 27 415 44 Search in Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1925). The genesis of the self and social control. International Journal of Ethics, 35(3), 251–277. MeadG. H. 1925 The genesis of the self and social control International Journal of Ethics 35 3 251 277Search in Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (2015). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press. MeadG. H. 2015 Mind, self, and society University of Chicago Press Search in Google Scholar

Pfadenhauer, M. (2016). In-between spaces. Pluralism and hybridity as elements of a new paradigm for religion in the modern age. Human Studies, 39, 147–159. PfadenhauerM. 2016 In-between spaces. Pluralism and hybridity as elements of a new paradigm for religion in the modern age Human Studies 39 147 159Search in Google Scholar

Roszkowska, P., & Melé, D. (2021). Organizational factors in the individual ethical behaviour. The notion of the “organizational moral structure”. Humanistic Management Journal, 6(2), 187–209. RoszkowskaP. MeléD. 2021 Organizational factors in the individual ethical behaviour. The notion of the “organizational moral structure” Humanistic Management Journal 6 2 187 209Search in Google Scholar

Schütz, A. (1995). El Problema de la realidad social. (N. Miguez, Trad.). Amorrortu. SchützA. 1995 El Problema de la realidad social MiguezN. Trad. Amorrortu Search in Google Scholar

Steets, S. (2016). What makes people tick? And what makes a society tick? And is a theory useful for inderstanding? An interview with Peter L. Berger. Human Studies, 39, 7–25. SteetsS. 2016 What makes people tick? And what makes a society tick? And is a theory useful for inderstanding? An interview with Peter L. Berger Human Studies 39 7 25Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2016). Constructing public space: Global perspectives on social media and popular contestation. International Journal of Communication, 10, 226–234. Van DijckJ. PoellT. 2016 Constructing public space: Global perspectives on social media and popular contestation International Journal of Communication 10 226 234Search in Google Scholar

Verbeek, P.-P. (2015). Designing the public sphere: Information technologies and the politics of mediation. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The onlife manifesto (pp. 217–227). Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_21 VerbeekP.-P. 2015 Designing the public sphere: Information technologies and the politics of mediation FloridiL. (Ed.) The onlife manifesto 217 227 Springer International Publishing http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_21 Search in Google Scholar

Voorhoeve, A. (2011). Conversations on ethics. Oxford University Press. VoorhoeveA. 2011 Conversations on ethics Oxford University Press Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
0226-1766
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
Volume Open
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Social Sciences, other