Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first permanent molars: cephalometric evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Walton DK, Fields HW, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF, Firestone AR, Christensen JC. Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:698.e1–12.WaltonDKFieldsHWJohnstonWMRosenstielSFFirestoneARChristensenJC. Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2010;138:698.e1–12.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.01221130314Search in Google Scholar
Gu J, Tang JS, Skulski B, Fields HW Jr, Beck FM, Firestone AR. Evaluation of invisalign treatment effectiveness and efficiency compared with conventional fixed appliances using the peer assessment rating index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:259–66.GuJTangJSSkulskiBFieldsHWJrBeckFMFirestoneAR. Evaluation of invisalign treatment effectiveness and efficiency compared with conventional fixed appliances using the peer assessment rating index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2017;151:259–66.10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.04128153154Search in Google Scholar
Janson G, Mendes LM, Junqueira CH, Garib DG. Soft-tissue changes in Class II malocclusion patients treated with extractions: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2016;38:631–7.JansonGMendesLMJunqueiraCHGaribDG. Soft-tissue changes in Class II malocclusion patients treated with extractions: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod2016;38:631–7.10.1093/ejo/cjv08326620831Search in Google Scholar
Konstantonis D, Vasileiou D, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Soft tissue changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 2018;126:167–79.KonstantonisDVasileiouDPapageorgiouSNEliadesT. Soft tissue changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Sci2018;126:167–79.10.1111/eos.1240929480521Search in Google Scholar
Williams R. Single arch extraction – upper first molars or what to do when nonextraction treatment fails. Am J Orthod 1979;76:376–93.WilliamsR. Single arch extraction – upper first molars or what to do when nonextraction treatment fails. Am J Orthod1979;76:376–93.10.1016/0002-9416(79)90224-0291341Search in Google Scholar
Booij JW, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Katsaros C. A treatment method for Class II division 1 patients with extraction of permanent maxillary first molars. World J Orthod 2009;10:41–8.BooijJWKuijpers-JagtmanAMKatsarosC. A treatment method for Class II division 1 patients with extraction of permanent maxillary first molars. World J Orthod2009;10:41–8.Search in Google Scholar
Livas C, Halazonetis DJ, Booij JW, Katsaros C. Extraction of maxillary first molars improves second and third molar inclinations in Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:377–82.LivasCHalazonetisDJBooijJWKatsarosC. Extraction of maxillary first molars improves second and third molar inclinations in Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011;140:377–82.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.02621889082Search in Google Scholar
Stalpers MJ, Booij JW, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Katsaros C. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:316–23.StalpersMJBooijJWBronkhorstEMKuijpers-JagtmanAMKatsarosC. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2007;132:316–23.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.03417826599Search in Google Scholar
Bondemark L, Holm AK, Hansen K, Axelssen S, Mohlin B, Brattstrom V. Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment and patient satisfaction. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2007;77:181–91.BondemarkLHolmAKHansenKAxelssenSMohlinBBrattstromV. Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment and patient satisfaction. A systematic review. Angle Orthod2007;77:181–91.10.2319/011006-16R.117029533Search in Google Scholar
Maniewicz Wins S, Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Predictive factors of sagittal stability after treatment of Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2016;86:1033–41.Maniewicz WinsSAntonarakisGSKiliaridisS. Predictive factors of sagittal stability after treatment of Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod2016;86:1033–41.10.2319/052415-350.1859733626618887Search in Google Scholar
Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JAJr, Hunter WS. An atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from the University School growth study. Craniofacial Growth Series Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1974.RioloMLMoyersREMcNamaraJAJrHunterWS. An atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from the University School growth study. Craniofacial Growth SeriesAnn Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1974.Search in Google Scholar
Janson G, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Niederberger A. Changes in apical base sagittal relationship in Class II malocclusion treatment with and without premolar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod 2017;87:338–55.JansonGAliaga-Del CastilloANiederbergerA. Changes in apical base sagittal relationship in Class II malocclusion treatment with and without premolar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod2017;87:338–55.10.2319/030716-198.1838436727598907Search in Google Scholar
Kouvelis G, Dritsas K, Doulis I, Kloukos D, Gkantidis N. Effect of orthodontic treatment with 4 premolar extractions compared with nonextraction treatment on the vertical dimension of the face: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2018;154:175–87.KouvelisGDritsasKDoulisIKloukosDGkantidisN. Effect of orthodontic treatment with 4 premolar extractions compared with nonextraction treatment on the vertical dimension of the face: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2018;154:175–87.10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.00730075920Search in Google Scholar
Booij JW, Goeke J, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Ruf S. Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison. J Orofacial Orthop 2013;74:52–63.BooijJWGoekeJBronkhorstEMKatsarosCRufS. Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison. J Orofacial Orthop2013;74:52–63.10.1007/s00056-012-0112-123299649Search in Google Scholar
Bock NC, von Bremen J, Ruf S. Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2016;38:129–39.BockNCvon BremenJRufS. Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod2016;38:129–39.10.1093/ejo/cjv009491475425820407Search in Google Scholar
Booij JW, Goeke J, Bronkhorst EM, Pancherz H, Ruf S, Katsaros C. Overjet correction and space closure mechanisms for Class II treatment by extracting the maxillary first molars. J Orofac Orthop 2011;72:196–203.BooijJWGoekeJBronkhorstEMPancherzHRufSKatsarosC. Overjet correction and space closure mechanisms for Class II treatment by extracting the maxillary first molars. J Orofac Orthop2011;72:196–203.10.1007/s00056-011-0025-421744198Search in Google Scholar
Weyrich C, Lisson JA. The effect of premolar extractions on incisor position and soft tissue profile in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop 2009;70:128–38.WeyrichCLissonJA. The effect of premolar extractions on incisor position and soft tissue profile in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop2009;70:128–38.10.1007/s00056-009-0813-219322531Search in Google Scholar
Seben MP, Valarelli FP, de Freitas KMS, Cançado RH, Bittencourt Neto AC. Cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 patients treated with two maxillary premolars extraction. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18:61–9.SebenMPValarelliFPde FreitasKMSCançadoRHBittencourt NetoAC. Cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 patients treated with two maxillary premolars extraction. Dental Press J Orthod2013;18:61–9.10.1590/S2176-9451201300040001024262418Search in Google Scholar
Joss-Vassalli I, Grebenstein C, Topouzelis N, Sculean A, Katsaros C. Orthodontic therapy and gingival recession: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2010;13:127–41.Joss-VassalliIGrebensteinCTopouzelisNSculeanAKatsarosC. Orthodontic therapy and gingival recession: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res2010;13:127–41.10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01491.x20618715Search in Google Scholar
Tepedino M, Franchi L, Fabbro O, Chimenti C. Post-orthodontic lower incisor inclination and gingival recession-a systematic review. Prog Orthod 2018;19:17.TepedinoMFranchiLFabbroOChimentiC. Post-orthodontic lower incisor inclination and gingival recession-a systematic review. Prog Orthod2018;19:17.10.1186/s40510-018-0212-6600434029911278Search in Google Scholar
Renkema AM, Navratilova Z, Mazurova K, Katsaros C, Fudalej PS. Gingival labial recessions and the post-treatment proclination of mandibular incisors. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:508–13.RenkemaAMNavratilovaZMazurovaKKatsarosCFudalejPS. Gingival labial recessions and the post-treatment proclination of mandibular incisors. Eur J Orthod2015;37:508–13.10.1093/ejo/cju07325481921Search in Google Scholar
Gebistorf M, Mijuskovic M, Pandis N, Fudalej PS, Katsaros C. Gingival recession in orthodontic patients 10 to 15 years posttreatment: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:645–55.GebistorfMMijuskovicMPandisNFudalejPSKatsarosC. Gingival recession in orthodontic patients 10 to 15 years posttreatment: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2018;153:645–55.10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.02029706212Search in Google Scholar
Mijuskovic M, Gebistorf MC, Pandis N, Renkema AM, Fudalej PS. Tooth wear and gingival recession in 210 orthodontically treated patients: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Orthod 2018;40:444–50.MijuskovicMGebistorfMCPandisNRenkemaAMFudalejPS. Tooth wear and gingival recession in 210 orthodontically treated patients: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Orthod2018;40:444–50.10.1093/ejo/cjx08329145570Search in Google Scholar
Livas C, Halazonetis DJ, Booij JW, Katsaros C. Extraction of maxillary first molars improves second and third molar inclinations in Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:377–82.LivasCHalazonetisDJBooijJWKatsarosC. Extraction of maxillary first molars improves second and third molar inclinations in Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011;140:377–82.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.02621889082Search in Google Scholar
Booij JW, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bronkhorst EM, Livas C, Ren Y, Kuijpers MAR. Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first molars: evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index. Orthod Craniofac Res 2021;24:102–10.BooijJWKuijpers-JagtmanAMBronkhorstEMLivasCRenYKuijpersMAR. Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first molars: evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index. Orthod Craniofac Res2021;24:102–10.10.1111/ocr.12412789162732725964Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR. The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:129–35.BisharaSECumminsDMJakobsenJR. The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1995;107:129–35.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70127-37847270Search in Google Scholar
Talass MF, Talass L, Baker RC. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:385–94.TalassMFTalassLBakerRC. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1987;91:385–94.10.1016/0889-5406(87)90391-XSearch in Google Scholar
Genecov JS, Sinclair PM, Dechow PC. Development of the nose and soft tissue profile. Angle Orthod 1990;60:191–8.GenecovJSSinclairPMDechowPC. Development of the nose and soft tissue profile. Angle Orthod1990;60:191–8.Search in Google Scholar
Inada E, Saitoh I, Hayasaki H, Yamada C, Iwase Y, Takemoto Y. Cross-sectional growth changes in skeletal and soft tissue cephalometric landmarks of children. Cranio 2008;26:170–81.InadaESaitohIHayasakiHYamadaCIwaseYTakemotoY. Cross-sectional growth changes in skeletal and soft tissue cephalometric landmarks of children. Cranio2008;26:170–81.10.1179/crn.2008.02318686493Search in Google Scholar
Bergman RT, Waschak J, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Murphy NC. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years. Angle Orthod 2014;84:48–55.BergmanRTWaschakJBorzabadi-FarahaniAMurphyNC. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years. Angle Orthod2014;84:48–55.10.2319/041513-291.1868305223834271Search in Google Scholar
Smith SL, Buschang PH. Midsagittal facial tissue thicknesses of children and adolescents from the Montreal growth study. J Forensic Sci 2001;46:1294–302.SmithSLBuschangPH. Midsagittal facial tissue thicknesses of children and adolescents from the Montreal growth study. J Forensic Sci2001;46:1294–302.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Hession TJ, Treder JE. Soft tissue profile changes from 5 to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:698–706.BisharaSEJakobsenJRHessionTJTrederJE. Soft tissue profile changes from 5 to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1998;114:698–706.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70203-39844211Search in Google Scholar
Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod 1990;60:177–90.NandaRSMengHKapilaSGoorhuisJ. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod1990;60:177–90.Search in Google Scholar
Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 1968;54:272–89.RickettsRM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod1968;54:272–89.10.1016/S0002-9416(68)90278-95238879Search in Google Scholar
Angelle PL. A cephalometric study of the soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1973;267–80.AngellePL. A cephalometric study of the soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment. Trans Eur Orthod Soc1973;267–80.Search in Google Scholar
Caplan MJ, Shivapuja PK. The effect of premolar extractions on the soft-tissue profile in adult African American females. Angle Orthod 1997;67:129–36.CaplanMJShivapujaPK. The effect of premolar extractions on the soft-tissue profile in adult African American females. Angle Orthod1997;67:129–36.Search in Google Scholar
Hayasaki SM, Castanha Henriques JF, Janson G, de Freitas MR. Influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment in Japanese-Brazilians with class I and class II division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:30–6.HayasakiSMCastanha HenriquesJFJansonGde FreitasMR. Influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment in Japanese-Brazilians with class I and class II division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2005;127:30–6.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.04315643412Search in Google Scholar
Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Dandajena TC. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:324–31.ErdincAENandaRSDandajenaTC. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2007;132:324–31.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.04517826600Search in Google Scholar
Kachiwala VA, Kalha AS, Machado G. Soft tissue changes associated with first premolar extractions in adult females. Aust Orthod J 2009;25:24–9.KachiwalaVAKalhaASMachadoG. Soft tissue changes associated with first premolar extractions in adult females. Aust Orthod J2009;25:24–9.Search in Google Scholar
López-Areal L, Paredes V, Gandía JL. Long-term analysis of upper incisor crowding. A longitudinal study orthodontically treated patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e245–51.López-ArealLParedesVGandíaJL. Long-term analysis of upper incisor crowding. A longitudinal study orthodontically treated patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal2011;16:e245–51.10.4317/medoral.16.e245Search in Google Scholar
Wallis C, McNamara C, Cunningham SJ, Sherriff M, Sandy RS, Ireland AJ. How good are we at estimating crowding and how does it affect our treatment decisions? Eur J Orthod 2014;36:465–70.WallisCMcNamaraCCunninghamSJSherriffMSandyRSIrelandAJ. How good are we at estimating crowding and how does it affect our treatment decisions?Eur J Orthod2014;36:465–70.10.1093/ejo/cjt08024243622Search in Google Scholar
Hoffelder LB, de Lima EM, Martinelli FL, Bolognese AM. Soft-tissue changes during facial growth in skeletal Class II individuals. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:490–5.HoffelderLBde LimaEMMartinelliFLBologneseAM. Soft-tissue changes during facial growth in skeletal Class II individuals. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2007;131:490–5.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.03017418715Search in Google Scholar
