The effect of the buccal corridor and tooth display on smile attractiveness

1. Kiyak HA. Does orthodontic treatment affect patients quality of life? J Dent Educ 2008;72:886-94.Search in Google Scholar

2. Thomas JL, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics. Angle Orthod 2003;73:359-64.Search in Google Scholar

3. Proffit WR. The soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a new view for a new century. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:46-9.10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00198.xSearch in Google Scholar

4. Parekh S, Fields HW, Beck FM, Rosenstiel SF. The acceptability of variations in smile arc and buccal corridor space. OrthodCraniofac Res 2007;10:15-21.10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00378.xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 2000;126:390-423.10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390Search in Google Scholar

6. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod 1985;87:21-6.10.1016/0002-9416(85)90170-8Search in Google Scholar

7. Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970;57:132-44.10.1016/0002-9416(70)90260-5Search in Google Scholar

8. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:311-24.10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00414.xSearch in Google Scholar

9. Mackley RJ. An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1993;63:183-9; discussion 190.Search in Google Scholar

10. Frush JP, Fisher RD. The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8:558-81.10.1016/0022-3913(58)90043-XSearch in Google Scholar

11. Ioi H, Kang S, Shimomura T, Kim SS, Park SB, Son WS et al. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese and Korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop 2012;142:459-65.10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.01122999668Search in Google Scholar

12. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop 2005;127:208-13; quiz 261.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.02715750540Search in Google Scholar

13. Ackerman MB. Buccal smile corridors. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop 2005;127:528-9; author reply 529.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.03.00915877025Search in Google Scholar

14. Oumeish OY. The cultural and philosophical concepts of cosmetics in beauty and art through the medical history of mankind. ClinDermatol 2001;19:375-86.10.1016/S0738-081X(01)00194-8Search in Google Scholar

15. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1970;40:284-318.Search in Google Scholar

16. Janson G, Branco NC, Fernandes TM, Sathler R, Garib D, Lauris JR. Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2011;81:153-61.10.2319/040710-195.1Search in Google Scholar

17. Ritter DE, Gandini LG, Pinto Ados S, Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod 2006;76:198-203.Search in Google Scholar

18. Zange SE, Ramos AL, Cuoghi OA, de Mendonça MR, Suguino R. Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals. Angle Orthod 2011;81:86-90.10.2319/031210-145.1Search in Google Scholar

19. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 1983;16:87-101.10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-XSearch in Google Scholar

20. Duncan GH, Bushnell MC, Lavigne GJ. Comparison of verbal and visual analogue scales for measuring the intensity and unpleasantness of experimental pain. Pain 1989;37:295-303.10.1016/0304-3959(89)90194-2Search in Google Scholar

21. Paul-Dauphin A, Guillemin F, Virion JM, Briançon S. Bias and precision in visual analogue scales: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:1117-27.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a00993710568628Search in Google Scholar