A comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the Objective Grading System (OGS) and the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index

1. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Kaczynski R, Shunock M. Early treatment outcome assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:544-50.10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70277-5Search in Google Scholar

2. Summers CJ. The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. Am J Orthod 1971;59:552-67.10.1016/0002-9416(71)90002-9Search in Google Scholar

3. Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:589-99.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70179-9Search in Google Scholar

4. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180-7.10.1093/ejo/14.3.180Search in Google Scholar

5. DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KW, Vig PS, Weyant RJ, O’Brien K. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:172-6.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70133-8Search in Google Scholar

6. Hamdan AM, Rock WP. An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:181-92.10.1093/ejo/21.2.181Search in Google Scholar

7. O’Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod 1993;20:25-35.10.1179/bjo.20.1.25Search in Google Scholar

8. O’Brien KD, Robbins R, Vig KW, Vig PS, Shnorhokian H, Weyant R. The effectiveness of Class II, division 1 treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:329-34.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70149-4Search in Google Scholar

9. Richmond S, Andrews M. Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:7-15.10.1093/ejo/15.1.78436199Search in Google Scholar

10. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD et al. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:125-39.10.1093/ejo/14.2.1251582457Search in Google Scholar

11. Firestone AR, Beck FM, Beglin FM, Vig KW. Evaluation of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an index of orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:463-9.10.1067/mod.2002.128465Search in Google Scholar

12. McKnight MM, Daniels CP, Johnston LE Jr. A retrospective study of two-stage treatment outcomes assessed with two modified PAR indices. Angle Orthod 1998;68:521-4; discussion 525-6.Search in Google Scholar

13. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications, 1940.Search in Google Scholar

14. Richmond S. Personal audit in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1993;20:135-44.10.1179/bjo.20.2.135Search in Google Scholar

15. Dyken RA, Sadowsky PL, Hurst D. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the peer assessment rating index. Angle Orthod 2001;71:164-9.Search in Google Scholar

16. al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van ‘t Hof MA. Occlusal outcome of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1998;68:439-44.Search in Google Scholar

17. Buchanan IB, Russell JI, Clark JD. Practical application of the PAR index: an illustrative comparison of the outcome of treatment using two fixed appliance techniques. Br J Orthod 1996;23:351-7.10.1179/bjo.23.4.351Search in Google Scholar

18. Fox NA. The first 100 cases: a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (peer assessment rating) index. Br Dent J 1993;174:290-7.10.1038/sj.bdj.4808157Search in Google Scholar

19. Kerr WJ, Buchanan IB, McColl JH. Use of the PAR index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances. Br J Orthod 1993;20:351-7.10.1179/bjo.20.4.351Search in Google Scholar

20. Shaw WC, Richmond S, O’Brien KD, Brook P, Stephens CD. Quality control in orthodontics: indices of treatment need and treatment standards. Br Dent J 1991;170:107-12.10.1038/sj.bdj.4807429Search in Google Scholar

21. Yang-Powers LC, Sadowsky C, Rosenstein S, BeGole EA. Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:451-5.10.1067/mod.2002.128464Search in Google Scholar

22. Pickering EA, Vig P. The occlusal index used to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1975;2:47-51.10.1179/bjo.2.1.47Search in Google Scholar

23. Tahir E, Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ. An assessment of treatment outcome in American Board of Orthodontics cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:335-42.10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70193-8Search in Google Scholar

24. Ngan P, Yiu C. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:414-20.10.1067/mod.2000.10825311029737Search in Google Scholar

25. Birkeland K, Furevik J, Bøe OE, Wisth PJ. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:279-88.10.1093/ejo/19.3.2799239958Search in Google Scholar

26. Taylor PJ, Kerr WJ, McColl JH. Factors associated with the standard and duration of orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1996;23:335-41.10.1179/bjo.23.4.3358985571Search in Google Scholar